Not posting anonymously.
Sincerely curious. If you worked in investment banking and you finished your analyst gig at a terrible group (i.e., bad deal-flow; mostly pitches; terrible culture), what did you do next?
Reason I'm asking is I'm in a terrible group and I'm not really learning a lot from my current job. It's deal-sourcing heavy even at a junior level. I feel stuck, yet when I send out resumes, people frown upon leaving my current gig around ~6 months. It also doesn't help that I got laid off ~6 months on my last job. It's not about the hours. Actually I'm averaging like 50 hours a week. Max I've got so far is ~90 and that was only 3 times.
Interesting post -- we always hear about the "top groups," but curious to hear if those from the "lesser groups" still did fine (and I imagine many of them did).
bump
.
Some MM PE firms that has no way of knowing how few serious deals your bank closes and long as there are at least 2 and a half decent one on your resume. Same with lateraling. People care about your skill set and knowledge so you can step in and do the gig. Not as concerned with how many sick deal trophies you have (unless you wanna go MF)
What about non technical IB groups? Like shareholder activism etc.. could you make it into PE or HF if you got ur CFA L1 (and maybe L2) or FINRA licenses to prove your financial competence? Or would u have to lateral into a technical group for a year then make a jump?
Left a shareholder activism team and moved into coverage at a BB. Nobody from my old team had great exits and all the top analysts lateraled to another bank before doing PE
Are you in a technical coverage group or one that outsources execution and/or modeling?
How did you make that transition?
Not just the how. But the why, who, where, what?
what were your internal and external drivers ?
what was the outcome ?
+Why
++ When I joined my team it was one of the best and went after very large mandates. They transitioned to more of a consulting / advisory role by the time I started and really moved in that direction during my time there. That resulted in less mega-campaigns which was less interesting to me (I’d rather 2-3 large proxy fights vs 20-30 ongoing projects without an activist).
+Who
++ I was lucky enough to have a lot of friends at other firms who were helpful in thinking through what I wanted and helping me prep
+Where
++ I wanted to stay in NYC, so I kept my options limited to this region. Is this what you meant?
+What
++ I’m not sure about this one
+Internal drivers
++ I wasn’t really interested in the work anymore and really wanted to enjoy the work I was doing. I’m already on some really cool projects and love the space
+External drivers
++ It’s definitely a good experience and will open a lot of doors for me in the future, so that was another factor for me
Hope this helps!
For me I’m really interested in my coverage space and wanted to do either banking or PE in this sector. After deciding banking was the best next step, I focused on opportunities in my space (but still applied to other coverage teams and M&A and LevFin teams at a few places).
The lateral market has been really hot, so I did luck out on that front. I’d say having a clear idea of what you want and why is really helpful for the transition process.
There is nothing bad about IB about the hours
quit whining and get back to work?!
Your spam on every post is annoying. Kindly shut the fuck up
It’s a serious post.
All groups are very similar. Much of bankers time is spend on pitching with little execution. It’s the nature of client relationship management
Thats why I was saying there’s no bad group, your exit opps are very similar irregardless of what bank your at.
There’s nothing really bad about IB (pay is great, work is standardized).
We think our groups are different but we are a commodity industry. Sorry
This entire thread is pointless.
Exit opps are the same. If you want something bad in life you work for it.
Bump
M7 MBA -> Consulting :)
Life is good now, I'm close with my Analyst class still, and I came out of it with solid Excel skills tho prematurely aged. No real complaints.
Hey man, thanks for your comment, and glad to hear that things are going well for you.
I will say that your situation sounds worse. I was at a legit company, just looking at a lot of small potato deals and doing a lot of pitching, but never had to actually source my own (that was still on the higher ups). If you're not learning any hard skills - finance/accounting, how to build out models, Excel/PPT basics... then your group sounds pretty bad.
bump
I was in shareholder activism group at a notable middle market boutique (not quite an EB, according to WSO). Left and now doing LO AM. Much, much chiller lifestyle.
Thanks for your comment. I would like to understand a couple of things.
Thanks again :)
Hi!
1. Usually pretty similar to any coverage analyst, just that you need to understand how to do modeling for a wide variety of sectors (at least that's what I did).
2. Exits weren't outstanding in general from company, but usually pretty easy to move internally.
3. Usually average compared to other groups. Sometimes a bit below average but not by much
Could you expand on what you do day-to-day in LO AM? Interested in the path, would love to hear more
Nostrum itaque in eligendi iste. Maxime placeat in culpa porro ut.
Dolorum numquam at est et vel ea. Corrupti culpa ex eveniet reiciendis. Odit tenetur est facilis dolorem. Voluptatibus deserunt quasi aut excepturi quia necessitatibus.
Occaecati deleniti placeat est ea. Libero adipisci fuga sit sit autem et odio. Quas libero sapiente fugiat qui dolorum voluptates fugit incidunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Voluptatem recusandae velit cupiditate reprehenderit et est. Aliquid aut itaque voluptas similique eveniet occaecati in. Excepturi in officia non quaerat ut adipisci dolor.
Natus explicabo quis sint ipsum libero soluta est. Minima fugit et dolorem voluptatem neque vel incidunt odio.
At nisi sit animi sequi et nisi iure. Vel suscipit qui sint consequatur. Corrupti rem fuga odit odio sint et totam. Facere voluptatibus sint ut. Odio veniam consequuntur aliquam fugiat nesciunt veniam laboriosam.
Vero placeat iste non dolorem quo facilis quia. Quidem voluptatem voluptatem pariatur. Quia nostrum omnis omnis voluptas.