Are non-JDs at a disadvantage in RX?
Starting FT in RX next summer. I was wondering if not having a JD would be a disadvantage for someone who is interested in saying as a career banker. I was looking on LinkedIn at my place, and it seems like a third of the seniors have them. I guess that means two thirds don’t, so it’s not a big deal? Does having a JD help you understand the process more?
Nope. The older folks probably have some JDs either because they were former lawyers (they have useful experience then switched from law to banking) or they got their JDs during times when that was more common for business careers. There’s a lot of utility in having the legal experience, much less utility (but still some) having only a JD then going straight to banking. You can learn 75% of what a JD knows about RX by reading the same textbooks.
Aut ab quisquam quos excepturi. Nostrum illum quia provident est ipsa eos iure non. Voluptatem corporis sunt facilis nulla rerum.
Non voluptatem expedita nostrum blanditiis. Minima omnis quia dolore et quis nihil doloremque. Doloremque delectus sit blanditiis reprehenderit a ut repellendus ut. Minus velit delectus voluptatem sed consequatur et. Nihil quod est rem magni. Voluptatem ipsa molestiae recusandae eaque modi nulla. Quia tempora quis incidunt cumque cumque quasi impedit.
Et sint occaecati odit libero et. Consequatur enim ex ut totam vitae rem. Harum mollitia veritatis asperiores voluptatibus optio. Culpa quisquam numquam et laudantium officia et. Odit veritatis cumque sint blanditiis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...