43 Comments
 

have to agree with the posters above- not a great script and shia lebouf is...well shia lebouf. i saw it simply because I had to

 

I thought it was pretty good. It was very well directed, had some great editing, and great shots of New York City. The story was so-so, but it's Wall Street. The acting was great, especially Michael Douglas. It seemed awkward at times, such as when Bud Fox makes a cameo..actually it was very awkward. It had some really good scenes as well as some great dialogue at times. It's very over-the-top at times(when Shia breaks off in Japanese mid-sentence when speaking to investors).I recommend it though!

 
Best Response

Imagine having an older brother (wall street the movie) that you idolized, but who went away on a long journey for 20 years and has been out of touch. Then, when you finally reunite, you learn that he talks to himself, married a dude, wears tinfoil hats to protect himself from government mind control, and has tea parties with cats. A totally unrecognizable tragedy, best remembered for the glory of what he once was, and not what he has become.

Not only should you not go see the movie, you should show some restraint once the dvdrip is available via torrents and just flat out refuse to view it.

 
ConphasImagine having an older brother (wall street the movie) that you idolized, but who went away on a long journey for 20 years and has been out of touch. Then, when you finally reunite, you learn that he talks to himself, married a dude, wears tinfoil hats to protect himself from government mind control, and has tea parties with cats. A totally unrecognizable tragedy, best remembered for the glory of what he once was, and not what he has become.

Not only should you not go see the movie, you should show some restraint once the dvdrip is available via torrents and just flat out refuse to view it.

Hahahah!

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis, you can't trust people Jeremy
 

^^^ Classic!!!

@eyelikecheese did you really think the editing was great, i'm hoping you are being sarcastic...it had the editing of a cartoon turned live-action movie. Did anyone say wtf when he was on the phone in the car and his coworker appears in a bubble? I don't even know where to start, just when I thought "oh i might not be that bad" Douglas had stopped talking and then something awkward happened again.

I had to come home and watch the original just to feel better.

 

I wrote a review of it:

Wall Street 2 Review

Score: B/C+, Watch it but see it on dvd.

Pros: 1) Michael Douglas reprising his role as Gekko. Not as epic as the first movie, but still excellent. Portrayed a little more evil than I would have liked, but still human. Stone manages to craft him as a man still tetering on the edge of morality, who can't quite change what he is but is human in his flaws. I can appreciate that.

2) Technical directing: Manages to capture the chaos of wall street, even if it gets a bit mellodramatic at points. Costumes, sets and shots of new york were generally well done, adding to a theme of excess and prosperity.

3) Actor selection: Carrie Mulligan, Frank Langella, James Brolin, all great in their roles although would have appreciated a good deal more depth with all of them. Shia wasn't too bad either although his character seemed too random at times. Still, it's inherently Gekko's movie, so all of this is understandable.

Cons:

1) Mellodrama: Way too mellodramatic at points. Everything seemed on the verge of collapse all the time. While it may have been appropriate for some of the stock market scenes, it got a bit annoying towards the end when nearly every moment tried to add some unnecessary intensity. At some points, it was like a really diluted version of an indian soap opera.

2) Politics: Oliver Stone's a very liberal guy, and although I disagree with him, I'm all right with him expressing his views. Still, I don't like my narratives diluted with a healthy dose of propoganda. There were points when I felt he was downright didactic.

3) Very random story: It's really just the amalgamation of a bunch of subplots that somehow result in a happy ending. The question of why the fuck did he do this comes into your head a lot as you're watching it. There are plenty of plot holes, which I can't reveal without too many spoilers. It has it's enjoyable points, but don't expect an amazing narrative here.

It's no secret Oliver Stone made this movie just to make a sequel. The critics haven't exactly celebrated it and I'm no different. Having watched wall street again only the day before, I can I was disappointed with somethings and all right with others. It's a flawed story about a flawed man living a flawed life. The Gekko we ( well at least I once loved) isn't totally there, but he isn't totally gone either. He's developed, I just don't totally like the development. If you loved the original wall street, I think this is still worth checking out, but do so when it comes out on dvd / torrent.

 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 
whateverittakes
notjonstewartI wrote a review of it:

Wall Street 2 Review

Score: B/C+, Watch it but see it on dvd.

Pros: 1) Michael Douglas reprising his role as Gekko. Not as epic as the first movie, but still excellent. Portrayed a little more evil than I would have liked, but still human. Stone manages to craft him as a man still tetering on the edge of morality, who can't quite change what he is but is human in his flaws. I can appreciate that.

2) Technical directing: Manages to capture the chaos of wall street, even if it gets a bit mellodramatic at points. Costumes, sets and shots of new york were generally well done, adding to a theme of excess and prosperity.

3) Actor selection: Carrie Mulligan, Frank Langella, James Brolin, all great in their roles although would have appreciated a good deal more depth with all of them. Shia wasn't too bad either although his character seemed too random at times. Still, it's inherently Gekko's movie, so all of this is understandable.

Cons:

1) Mellodrama: Way too mellodramatic at points. Everything seemed on the verge of collapse all the time. While it may have been appropriate for some of the stock market scenes, it got a bit annoying towards the end when nearly every moment tried to add some unnecessary intensity. At some points, it was like a really diluted version of an indian soap opera.

2) Politics: Oliver Stone's a very liberal guy, and although I disagree with him, I'm all right with him expressing his views. Still, I don't like my narratives diluted with a healthy dose of propoganda. There were points when I felt he was downright didactic.

3) Very random story: It's really just the amalgamation of a bunch of subplots that somehow result in a happy ending. The question of why the fuck did he do this comes into your head a lot as you're watching it. There are plenty of plot holes, which I can't reveal without too many spoilers. It has it's enjoyable points, but don't expect an amazing narrative here.

It's no secret Oliver Stone made this movie just to make a sequel. The critics haven't exactly celebrated it and I'm no different. Having watched wall street again only the day before, I can I was disappointed with somethings and all right with others. It's a flawed story about a flawed man living a flawed life. The Gekko we ( well at least I once loved) isn't totally there, but he isn't totally gone either. He's developed, I just don't totally like the development. If you loved the original wall street, I think this is still worth checking out, but do so when it comes out on dvd / torrent.

I hope you didn't actually try to pawn this off as a professional review for a website, magazine, blog, or some other publication. You write badly.

He writes poorly....

 
Kanon
GenesisSucked ass. So many freaking holes.

Holes would imply there was a plot. There was no semblance of plot.

Could be mistaken..i believe Kanon was referring to assholes...since there was no plot

it went downhill after the coming attractions

------------ I'm making it up as I go along.
 

It was an awful movie, but the one line that made the $7 I paid to see it completely worth it was when Jacob (Shia) asked Bretton what his 'number' was... the sum of money he would need to completely abandon Wall Street and Bretton replied, "more." Huge boss.

 

I don't think the movie would have been horrible if it wasn't a sequel. If it stood alone and wasn't compared to such a classic as the first, I think people would have a slightly different impression of it.

The best parts were the ones that had GG in it, specifically the part on the train when he talks about falling in love with money...this is also where the title/tag line for the movie seems to come from.

The bad parts were that the fiance looks like a boy, it is no where near as good as the original, there is no way Shia could realistically speak Chinese or have graduated from college, lol. Also it was far too predictable.

Not worth going to see in the theater, just wait and grab it through NetFlix or Redbox for a $1.

Regards

"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so." - Ronald Reagan
 
cphbravo96I don't think the movie would have been horrible if it wasn't a sequel. If it stood alone and wasn't compared to such a classic as the first, I think people would have a slightly different impression of it.

I think you're being rather nice. Even as a standalone, I thought the movie was terrible. The cheesy bubbles (when that female colleague called Shia's character and her head was floating over his girlfriend's face), and unrealistic concepts made it a tough pill to swallow.

In WS2 they covered the following in 2hrs: - bear /JPM /GS shorting /real estate market /insider trading /revenge /green technology or clean energy /China's rising importance as investors /romance /20 mins of Gekko shopping in London /Shia's girlfriend's daddy issues etc. The movie played like it was written by a kid w/ ADD.

It would have been a much better (or at least, bearable/decent) movie if they chose to focus on fewer topics, rather than skim the top of 20+ issues.

 
lever upIt seemed pretty corny with a lot of term dropping to try add validity.

Watched the first one right before going to the theater, it really set the bar too high for the second.

I did the same thing...I would add that it was also way overacted..you could tell that these guys were actors and it gave no sense of realism..

 

I watched the movie, not believing all of your comments on how bad it was.

Gents, I was wrong. It sucked ass. WS2 raped and pissed on the body of WS1. I am still in mourning for what they did to that franchise.

 
Anthony .SB for you bro.

That chick was fugly.

That was a girl?

I was mad because I thought the movie was about homosexuality and I don't care to see boys kissin'.

Regards

"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so." - Ronald Reagan
 

One of the more disappointing events in my life...

I can't stop thinking of what it could have been if Oliver Stone had focused on telling a solid narrative instead of sharing his own personal views.

And I agree about focusing on fewer plot points...would've been more coherent and made more sense.

 

How about those charts on the NYC skyline, random animations of the renewable energy plant, and also loved the artistic vision portrayed in the numbers all over peoples faces and those cloud-like popup bubbles whenever Shia got a call from someone else... I never knew you could do so much on imovie - props Oliver.

 

Accusamus vel omnis suscipit sequi alias corporis. Placeat eaque et quis consequatur. Perspiciatis voluptatem ad nihil laudantium ex et. Aut vel perspiciatis distinctio consequatur magnam alias. Dolorum fuga tempora tempore quod. Quisquam veniam voluptatem itaque quis in.

Sit repellendus saepe perspiciatis maiores et ut. Consequatur aperiam eius vitae quas quia sit. Et perspiciatis omnis harum nam laboriosam.

Quae libero fugiat exercitationem similique maxime quas. Consequuntur doloribus adipisci quidem laboriosam voluptatibus consequatur. Non sint accusamus fuga non. Dolores repellat consectetur voluptatem accusantium. Enim sit molestias illo perspiciatis totam aut. Nesciunt ut rerum itaque earum voluptatem doloribus. Accusamus aut soluta asperiores est molestiae.

 

Magnam consectetur quod adipisci autem ipsa non voluptatum. Ducimus iure hic est sit. Voluptas magni consequatur ut dolore eius. Laborum voluptatum dolorem aspernatur placeat modi qui fugit odit. Dolor est aut dolor ut ab.

Aliquid ex perspiciatis maxime non. Voluptas in quo explicabo iure. Et libero adipisci non itaque dolores at. Blanditiis qui sunt eum voluptas. Rerum tenetur omnis et provident assumenda quis tenetur. Ipsam laborum qui qui nihil nisi facilis quo. Enim sunt repellendus eum quasi.

 

Sed maiores provident et est maiores dolor molestias. Omnis veritatis dolorum occaecati nobis qui eos aspernatur. Laboriosam ut aut omnis at facere. Saepe odio qui aut ab et accusamus voluptas.

Velit delectus aliquam minima consequatur consequatur. Nemo quis ipsum accusantium hic aut earum delectus. Praesentium sit pariatur numquam cum impedit quia eius. Eaque omnis eligendi repudiandae unde eos ut.

Maxime officiis id dolorum vel. Eos sit quas illum quibusdam nesciunt hic. Et est doloremque tempore et.

From the ghetto....

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”