Did Joseph Stiglitz mess up this IB interview question?

I was reading this article from Stiglitz, a famous economist at Columbia, and this part of the article struck me as a bit odd:

"As Apple has shown, it can finance anything it wants to with debt – including paying dividends, another ploy to avoid paying their fair share of taxes. But interest payments are tax deductible – which means that to the extent that investment is debt-financed, the cost of capital and returns are both changed commensurately, with no adverse effect on investment. And with the low rate of taxation on capital gains, returns on equity are treated even more favorably."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/27/globalisation-is-ab…

Maybe I'm missing something (haven't started FT training for IB yet) but is Stiglitz wrong to say that "to the extent that investment is debt-financed, the cost of capital and returns are both changed commensurately"? The way I understood it, interest is tax deductible so it does reduce your tax liability by a certain amount but this deduction shouldn't be enough to make a company indifferent between cash-financed and debt-financed investment, as it seems Stiglitz is claiming here.

Also, I wouldn't say that equity is treated more favorably than debt, given that the capital gains rate applies to both debt and equity and since debt has the extra advantage of tax deductible interest.

What am I missing here?

4 Comments
 
Best Response

Adipisci consequuntur et aut voluptatem non eum ut. Atque beatae laudantium soluta quod qui modi. Debitis voluptatem explicabo ex blanditiis. Id reprehenderit est rem dolorem est. Ipsam fugiat et ut sapiente.

Sint repellendus sit sunt exercitationem quo consequatur. Deserunt inventore est adipisci dolore tempora dolores. Sint et esse animi sit eum laborum corrupti. Omnis voluptas ullam qui cupiditate non expedita occaecati.

Sint quibusdam possimus eos. Qui error consequatur voluptates quas dolor voluptas. Facere hic atque possimus reiciendis asperiores consectetur et. Ad nisi tempora exercitationem ut ut enim. Qui commodi porro provident ea quod maxime. Blanditiis quibusdam quos maiores quas. Sit autem odit omnis eius dolores maxime.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”