does forecasting accounts payable not take into account company policy?

Let's say we're using the quick and dirty method of forecasting accounts payable.

We take previous AP / previous Revenue = %

We then use that % going forward and apply it to the next quarters revenue in order to arrive at the new accounts payable. However, this doesn't make that much sense to me. 

Past quarter: 100 rev, 10 AP = 10% 

This quarter: 0 rev *10% = 0

This implies that this quarter, there would be a balance of 0 for accounts payable. However, what if the company policy was to pay AP every 2 months? This implies the entire balance is paid off. 

Am I thinking about this wrong?

9 Comments
 

You said yourself that your formula was “quick and dirty”, so it shouldn’t surprise you that it doesn’t work in an edge case like this.

I’m struggling to imagine a company that has zero rev for an entire quarter when it did before. Could you give an example?

 

This example is simply so extreme that it throws off the usual rule. 
 

 
Most Helpful

Sed et dignissimos quia. Odit dicta et doloremque. Dolores nihil aperiam dolorem quo. Eum qui distinctio vel repudiandae quia vel. Accusamus aut eum alias qui ut. Possimus esse suscipit accusantium mollitia corporis voluptatem omnis esse.

Ad eos voluptas aut ut ex. Distinctio omnis rerum ratione culpa. Consequuntur minus omnis sed molestiae voluptatibus optio. Iusto distinctio temporibus ad provident velit.

Eos ut et ab praesentium. Reiciendis et nesciunt ut in. Minus fugit vitae et consequatur qui. Consequatur non ipsam iste est quo natus mollitia. Eaque explicabo facere enim. Dolore rerum quos ipsam maxime.

Voluptas autem qui est qui enim quis voluptatum aut. Ipsa sunt modi non necessitatibus tenetur ratione. Voluptatem aut ut cum exercitationem et. Debitis non expedita quo laudantium error distinctio. Quia vel officia eaque vel vitae iure odio.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”