Easily the worst analyst in my group.

There are probably a million posts like this but hit the desk a few weeks ago and I can already tell I am the worst analyst in my group and its not even remotely close. I made a bunch (and I know people say everyone new makes mistakes and its understandable) but a BUNCH of mistakes and even making the same mistake multiple times. I know my perception is already god awful and every associate knows me already as “that analyst” and probably roll their eyes when they see I am staffed with them.

What do I do from here? I think just unfortunately I am learning things and adjusting/ramping up 10x slower than your average analyst. I feel wildly wildly incompetent and useless and an idiot. I honestly don’t even care about being bottom bucket, its probably what I deserve. I guess just the point of this post was to hear if others feel the same way to help ease my anxiety and stress. Thanks guys.

 
Most Helpful

one of the worst analysts in my group...who was known as "that analyst" and frankly was left to work on really mundane crappy pitchwork, surprised us all when he sent his farewell email around and announced he was joining a decent MM PE shop.  I was genuinely happy for him. I think in general IB work is pretty stupid and the culture borders on sociopathy, so arguing over "rockstar" and "bad" analysts is sort like arguing over who is the best and worst Taliban torture camp guard or something.  I'm not that impressed if someone "crushes" powerpoint and excel modeling.  But some associates/VPs really get themselves off over this.

no one will really care or know outside of your group.  just keep your head down, study your LBOs/case studies/technicals, and kill recruiting.  You got this!

 

No worries man.  I am totally fine working with "bad" analysts, as long as they want to help.  What people think is "bad" isnt really that bad if you know what I mean?

You guys get a million emails, tons of really hard to decipher comments, and have to deal with senior bankers expectations who have been doing the job for 20 years and don't remember what its like to not know finance concepts that well.

I was pretty bad when I joined.  I used to make merger models off the templates only and totally didn't understand what I was actually doing.  Just filled the inputs out from previous work. I didn't have time to figure it out because I was getting work shoved down my throat with tight timelines.  Only after like a year did I start to actually understand minimally what I was doing.  The only reason I was ok is I worked exclusively on a big deal with the most patient/kind person in the bank who basically hand held me through the motions and taught me everything.  I got a decent review from that person (and they could have really destroyed me if they wanted).

I am really empathetic to "bad" analysts/associates that join as a result.  Sometimes its just working with a sociopath on that first deal that "seals" your reputation unfortunately.  

 

Not to derail the topic, but I just threw this side-note to a text-group of some turbo-autist-giga-chad types and we generally agreed that Taliban torture camp guards could actually provide a lot of value if they perform tasks that are a bit more basic than just guarding the camp. For example, if the average "torture VP" has about 30 mins to come spend with the prisoner, the 23 hours and 30 minutes that the guard would spend with them could actually be used in some very sadistic ways to break down the prisoner for the next day that the "torture VP" would come back for his/her 30 minutes. It could be as basic as waking the prisoner up every 20 mins they try to sleep so that they never hit their REM cycle and have their probability of spilling the goods elevated way above average. 

To the OP, man up, if you're psychologically down on yourself like this, you will continue to screw up as the negative feedback loop in your brain becomes stronger. Continue to do your best until they fire you or you end up surprising everyone to the upside, which statistically is much more probabilistic if you are known as "the analyst". You mentioned you hit the desk 'a couple weeks ago', so the sample size is still too small. 

Read Phil Helmuth's "Positivity". "You are always in the right place in the right time" as Phil says throughout, I think it will help your psyche.

 

I think it's a plus that you can acknowledge and accept how bad you are right now. That's actually a big plus, a lot of people can't even get that right and think they're great when they're not. You're just going to have to try harder than the rest. What type of mistakes are you making? Make a note of it, and go over it before you go to sleep so you don't make it again. It's gonna suck but practice during whatever free time you have left until you start catching up. See if you can find a mentor to help you and ask good well thought out questions. Find the best analyst and see if you can pick his brain, if he's a douche then just watch him and pick up some of his habits. You'll get better, you just have to put in more work than other people. At least you want to get better.

 

Even if you want to be a killer analyst and get top-bucket bonuses, amazing references, etc. (strong assumption that you even do want that), all that matters is developing good relationships with seniors. The random associate who doesn't like working with you doesn't mean anything in the big picture. Get coffee with Directors/MDs, and do the really easy, high-visibility shit and absolutely crush those low hanging fruit. Send out press releases / news articles as soon as they come out, try to participate in meetings, etc.

I was in your shoes (3rd year analyst now and leaving soon) - I was trash at the job and would make stupid mistakes way too often. Soon realized I have two options:

1) Actually try to build those skills from the ground up, gain mentorship from strong associates, become a technical god who always goes above and beyond to produce flawless work (fuck that lol)

2) Just get by on the stuff above but become highly visible and liked by the people who actually matter for my review and in turn get great feedback while doing minimal work 

Obviously I picked option #2 - I don't want to be a career banker nor do I give a flying fuck what the miserable 35-year old MBA associate thinks about me when he catches that I missed a footnote. I have a core group of seniors who will vouch for me, I have waaay less anxiety around my work, and all around just enjoying better vibes. 

 

What press releases/news articles you sending out and to who? Would they actually appreciate that?

This is a good one that I forgot about.  Definitely something I did, especially early in the pandemic when everything slowed down and we were home.  Easy visibility and reminder that you exist.

If you're on a team that covers an industry you should subscribe to all the news sources that do the same.  If a transaction is announced, you simply copy and paste in an email to the group.  To your question, the good senior bankers are basically on the phone all day with clients, prospective clients, buddies in the industry, etc.  It doesn't reflect well on them if they're on a call with someone who brings up a fresh deal announcement and they have to peddle around the fact they hadn't heard the news.

Appreciation is a word rarely associated with banking but they're not going to be mad about it.

 

Even if you want to be a killer analyst and get top-bucket bonuses, amazing references, etc. (strong assumption that you even do want that), all that matters is developing good relationships with seniors. The random associate who doesn't like working with you doesn't mean anything in the big picture. Get coffee with Directors/MDs, and do the really easy, high-visibility shit and absolutely crush those low hanging fruit. Send out press releases / news articles as soon as they come out, try to participate in meetings, etc.

I was in your shoes (3rd year analyst now and leaving soon) - I was trash at the job and would make stupid mistakes way too often. Soon realized I have two options:

1) Actually try to build those skills from the ground up, gain mentorship from strong associates, become a technical god who always goes above and beyond to produce flawless work (fuck that lol)

2) Just get by on the stuff above but become highly visible and liked by the people who actually matter for my review and in turn get great feedback while doing minimal work 

Obviously I picked option #2 - I don't want to be a career banker nor do I give a flying fuck what the miserable 35-year old MBA associate thinks about me when he catches that I missed a footnote. I have a core group of seniors who will vouch for me, I have waaay less anxiety around my work, and all around just enjoying better vibes. 

Lmao gladly this doesn’t fly in pe since the teams are so small. My associates’ fates are 100% dependent on my reviews 

 

Find someone who will mentor you- we've all been there. Just be loyal to them. I made so many mistakes when I first started I just kept trying and stayed humble. The fact you acknowledge that you're not making the cut is half the battle.  Just stick with it and ask for help don't spin your wheels. 

Like the unadjusted- only with a little bit extra.
 

Felt that way when I first started too. One mental model that helped me overcome similiar feelings of anxiety was realizing that my two years as an analyst would eventually end and that I would move on with all the knowledge I had accumulated.

Because your analyst years won't last forever, you should focus your energy on maximizing learning opportunities / asking questions as opposed to stressing over your perceived lack of knowledge. Even if you were incompentent, it would take your boss around 6 months to find that out and another 6 months to do anything about it, at which point you'd be about halfway done with your stint. At the end of the day, just channel that stress you're feeling into intellectual curiosoity and use that to fuel your desire to get better. If you have to spend some extra time on the weekend reviewing stuff you don't understand, that's toally okay. I still allocate a certain portion of my day to read up on things I don't fully understand / poke around models.

The real world doesn't have an instruction manual and your learning experience is probably not a priority for your boss, so try to be your own advocate. If nothing else, you'll gain a sense of agency and shorten the transition from student to professional. Good luck!    

 

This has been discussed ad naseum on various threads, but analysts are generally the most safe when it comes to systematic layoffs. I would argue that is such little varation in analyst work product that you can't even control whether you get laid off, to a large extent. Processing comps an hour faster than the next analyst isn't why you suddenly find yourself out of a job, so just keep working on what you can control and you'll be fine. 

 

I'm having a similar issue but I'm staffed almost exclusively on deals with our office on the other coast and it feels tough to bounce back. Super hard to prove to someone remotely that you're learning and improving. I never interact with that team outside of them asking me for work so I'm basically a resource that they email when they need shit.

Best of luck man I think you can pull through.

 

Surprised (and happy) with all these comments so far. It’s a skill to have the awareness to know you might be a little behind the curve starting off.

I was in the same boat. Just practice practice practice and when you start feeling more confident by December maybe have a chat with your staffer (or associate/VP you develop a relationship with). Let them know you might’ve started slow but have been going above and beyond, but still want their input on where you can improve upon.

I’m a slow learner, but realized that and worked extremely hard my first year on the desk to be in a better place. This job isn’t hard - just requires you to put your head down and grind.

 

Its ok to be a "bad analyst", as long as you have a great attitude and somewhat improve over time. Starting banking is hard and takes time/reps to get better. I would know... I was in your position.

What's not ok is to be a bad analyst and also an unmotivated / shitty culture fit... have dealt with a few of those analysts over time and its mentally exhausting to work with them. 

 

Don't worry about it bud. I'm A2A and have been in banking for a while (ignore the title) and over the years have seen many straight up bottom bucket analysts get great exit opps (MF PE, cool start ups, etc.). Why? Because no one wants to work with them so they had all the time to network, prep for interviews and BS their way into those jobs. Whereas a few of the top analysts were so crushed that they didn't have the time to really recruit or vet out opportunities and just took the first job they could get. Granted I'm at a top bank so the name in itself helps but nevertheless see it as a blessing in disguise. If you are set on exiting there is 0 incentive to be good at the job.

 

I think many of us have been there at one point in time. 

Many people come into the job and were previously near the top of their high school, college, and even local bar trivia course and get blind-sided when they join the workforce at an IB and realize that many of the people are also from similar backgrounds. Feeling that pressure to perform and excel amongst your peers is good but you should also set reasonable expectations based on your performance.

Some tips overall:

  • Wanting to exit in response to this feeling is the worst thing you can do. The best thing you can do is try to identify what habits and skills you're able to work on so that you address the problem instead of just running away from it. A lot of juniors go into the "I'm going to recruit for the first LMM PE gig that hits me up" mood and don't seem to do that well
  • Focus on incremental improvements instead of big improvements. Overall, you're going to continue to have errors as long as you stay in the job. The best thing you can do is try and reduce the error rate to a reasonable level. You can do this with checker models, checking the top left and bottom right cell of a formula range to ensure things flow right, etc. 
  • If you're rushing to get work out and it is wrong focus on getting it right. This is key when you're working on other projects and the work comes later than expected as people expect it to be reasonably right. Come in with good quality work - not with fast work
 

Coming from the former worst analyst in my group to going A2A (which is probably i stuck w banking, jk?). First off, you’re a a month or two on the job, relax. Second, you care enough to make a post about this which to me is a good indicator that you have a good attitude. I’ve worked with bad analysts with good attitudes, and I’ve worked with extremely talented analysts whose attitudes sucked. Will take the former 10/10 times. Third, all the other first years are doing the same dumb shit you’re doing they just don’t advertise it.

Some very simple ways to get a lot better are:

  • spend a ton of time making shit look pretty. Perception is reality and you’ll get really fast doing the mundane stuff with enough reps
  • print (yes, you heard me) out everything you do, take a 5 minute walk after you finish something. Then force yourself to read AND understand everything that’s on the paper despite how painful before turning it in. I am way less pissed off when I ask about a number and the analyst put some thought into it.
  • be positive in the office, don’t complain, respond to people in a timely fashion
  • understand that banking is one of the toughest jobs you can do but also one of the most forgiving jobs. You mess up big time? Make sure it never happens again (spoiler it will happen again, just hopefully the time between whoopsies becomes longer)
 

exactly.  analysts that are not really getting it, but have killer attitudes and motivation usually get to stick around.  seniors will go to bat for you and help you out.

if you have a poor attitude people will really start to turn on you.  its politics honestly.  

 

I saw a similar post a month or so ago, so I'll give similar advice as I did before. Overall, it's counter-productive to say you're making a BUNCH of mistakes without trying to specify what mistakes you're making in on certain tasks. My advice would be to isolate where you struggle the most and build from there. 

What specifically are you struggling with? Turning decks? Running Comps? Building operating models? Diligence processes? Buyer lists? Here's some advice for some of those coming from an A3

Turning decks: Slow down. Any senior banker would rather have a deck ~30 min late than ~5 min early and having spelling / grammar errors. Print out your decks and compare it to the markup- a lot of times printed copies turn up more errors than just reviewing your work on a screen. Check things 3+ times when you're starting, with the last time taking a ~1 min walk around the office to reset your eyes

Running comps: leverage other bank's work here. Many IBs publish various industry comps in market updates they provide. Try googling "XXXX investment bank industry updates, "industry whitepapers," etc. If you're aware of a fairness opinion in the space, those almost always publish relevant comps

Building operating models: so much of banker's work is just leveraging prior outputs made from similar processes. If you're making an operating model, many times you don't have to start from scratch. Leverage other work as much as you can from a model skeleton standpoint

Diligence processes: you need to stay hyper organized at all times. Keep a running tally on where documents are published in the data room to start 

Buyer lists: it really depends on the industry, but CIQ buyer screens, pitchbook buyer screens, and just straight up googling can generate ideas. It's always better to have more buyers that are tier 2/3 rather than a handful that are tier 1 and not many additional ones. Be sure to build lots of support into your proposed buyer (how large are they, have they done any recent deals, similar geography, similar customers / end markets served, etc.)

If you're able to tell me what areas you're struggling with perhaps I can assist more 

 

Lots of really good advice here.

Don't let it get in your head. You'll start to second guess yourself and spiral. Some of the things you've said already make me feel like you're there "associates roll their eyes" etc. Get out of your own head man, this is the part about having a thick skin in IB that you'll always hear of.

When you make a mistake, write it down. Almost like a fuck up journal. You'll likely start to notice patterns and commonalities and will help you internalize what to spend more time on and watch out for when reviewing your own work.

 

I'd recommend keeping a log of lessons learned on your job and review them each night or each morning. Going into the more significant errors and do a quick root cause analysis on why you made those erros. 

1) What was the error?

2) What were the contributing factors to that error?

3) Identify a root cause.

4) Identify an instructional fix.

Quick example:

1) Why did I not catch that spelling error on the title slide?

2a) I was too focused on the other content and didn't review the entire slide deck.

2b) I had competing competing priorities and didn't prioritize reviewing before submission. 

2c) I didn't thoroughly review the entire slide deck before submitting.

3) Root cause: I didn't thoroughly review the entire slide deck. 

4) Instruction fix: Review entire slide deck including title and conclusion page before submission. If available, ask a peer to review before submission. 

 
exavpe

I'd recommend keeping a log of lessons learned on your job and review them each night or each morning. Going into the more significant errors and do a quick root cause analysis on why you made those erros. 

1) What was the error?

2) What were the contributing factors to that error?

3) Identify a root cause.

4) Identify an instructional fix.

Quick example:

1) Why did I not catch that spelling error on the title slide?

2a) I was too focused on the other content and didn't review the entire slide deck.

2b) I had competing competing priorities and didn't prioritize reviewing before submission. 

2c) I didn't thoroughly review the entire slide deck before submitting.

3) Root cause: I didn't thoroughly review the entire slide deck. 

4) Instruction fix: Review entire slide deck including title and conclusion page before submission. If available, ask a peer to review before submission. 

OP sucks so bad he'll probably have inconsistent bullet point formatting and spelling errors within his journal, rendering it useless. SAD! 

Just kidding, OP. FWIW you can be totally shit at your first job and jump to buyside or another IB where you can start fresh so long as you're a good interviewer. 

 

Iusto voluptates doloremque sed vel qui magni. Rerum beatae reprehenderit doloribus ut. Sunt qui officiis et et enim sit ut quia.

 

Tempora magni eos sint. Accusamus quia nam nam dicta provident.

Nulla aut reiciendis amet tempora et nostrum in ab. Ea id natus odio dolore. Reprehenderit corrupti non unde rerum. Atque quod illum nesciunt nihil. Eum temporibus quos qui omnis illum tempore.

Velit voluptate debitis ut tempora unde alias. Vel consequatur in dolorum.

Itaque ut odit laborum nam quasi totam et omnis. Placeat repellendus nemo consequuntur ipsum dicta ullam. Quis nemo quam id et dolorem voluptatem. Consequatur officiis nisi error autem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”