Elite Boutique vs. Top Tier BB

nutsaboutWSIs this BB MS/GS or is it lower tiers? Same with the boutique. Is it Perella or higher? A range won't give away who you are... "offer from ms/gs/jpm healthcare group vs. ghl/pwp/centerview M&A"

BB offer is from MS. The range you gave for boutiques is accurate.

Socal kids who read this site have a stiffy for "elite boutiques"

Who says 'stiffy'? I feel like that's how they would have said boner on power rangers or something.

foiegrasI don't understand

foiegrasI don't understand why people like these elite boutiques so much....I'm still in college so I obviously don't know shit, but turning down a BB for a boutique sounds like turning down an Ivy for a liberal arts college

Well you got one thing right.

foiegrasI don't understand why people like these elite boutiques so much....I'm still in college so I obviously don't know shit, but turning down a BB for a boutique sounds like turning down an Ivy for a liberal arts college

I agree. At the same time, plenty of people turn down Ivies for Williams, Amherst, and Swarthmore. While the average Joe won't know about Williams, for example, those who are educated know that it's one of the most outstanding institutions in America. Finally, are you telling me you would take any bulge bracket over Blackstone M&A, Lazard, or Greenhill?

Disclaimer: I don't attend and didn't apply to an LAC because I felt they were too small, but they are great schools nonetheless

duplicate

Very original topic. I look forward to the discussion.

I second what Oreos said. lol

bump

i think MS/JPM is the better choice for junior bankers, most of whom are not interested in having a long successful career in investment banking or simply won't make it. top BBs provide far greater optionality in the industry and, more importantly, outside of the industry...not just because of brand name but also due to greater breadth of experience. further, moving from top BB to elite boutique will remain an option permanently at all levels. if you decide you don't like life at MS/JPM, lateraling over to an elite boutique is very doable. moving from elite boutique to top BB is far more difficult at any level.

for those who know this industry is for them and banking is their calling, i think it's totally rational to choose a place like Greenhill over Morgan Stanley. i just think the vast majority of junior bankers are not in this group whether they know it yet or not.

Lol you need to pick your comps better. Greenhill has a generalist model and laz is generalist for summer internships. Take EVR unless you can get a top group specific offer at the BB.

First get into one of these shops..

I'm curious about this too. Especially because my preferred market would probably be the SF bay area. It seemed like things out here are a bit less regimented and more about networking. Culturally I could see myself enjoying a middle market bank like a Greenhill or Harris Williams. And in the long run, I'd probably be happier taking a little less comp and doing PE somewhere like Francisco partners or vector as opposed KKR or Blackstone.

interested in Blackstone m&a vs Goldman Sachs TMT. Pros, cons, prestige, etc.

1. Submit your applications. By doing this you can see if even a single investment bank -- BB, MM, Boutique or Mom & Pop's Basement Partners -- is interested in hiring you.

2. a) If none of the above shops is interested in hiring you, switch to plan B, C, D, ... , n. (Note that this is the most probable outcome of this exercise, by a considerable margin).

3. b) If you get 1 offer, take it.

4. c) If you get 2 offers, take the one you like better.

5. d) If you end up in the rare circumstance that your 2 best offers are really that difficult to choose between, then start a thread.

Sadly a lot of people seem to need the instructions.

Hypothetical BS like this thread (assuming based on original post) really gets tiresome after seeing the same topic come up again and again.

Lots of discussion at Purdue on BB vs. elite boutique, consider asking here:

http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~ssanty/cgi-bin/eightball.cgi

Nauru, I checked bizzy's profile to see if there was info that would suggest one way or the other whether his question is far fetched (even if it were, I'd probably respond more kindly than people on here have). It didn't really give any background that I could see. It's always funny to me how people seem to think that landing a banking job is the pinnacle of existence on which the entire human race is hellbent on achieving. I say this as someone who has been at Morgan Stanley, as well as a top consulting firm, and now a top law firm. I know a number of bankers who are, quite frankly, flat-out dumb. They got pseudo-decent grades at pseudo-decent schools like unc, uva, etc, and because they were in the right fraternity, they waltzed into gold man with ease. Moreover, I have several friends in b-school right now who are reporting that landing a banking gig is pretty easy right now.

Bizzy's question is not a moot point until after he has choices. Perhaps, like me, he's thinking he would not be willing to go to goldman if goldman asked? Or maybe he's thinking through his stance on these things so he can have an informed answer when someone asks him "why banking and why us?"

What happened to the original post?

Who cares?

http://bit.ly/QgSsC8

This is a great idea--this is something I've been wondering myself, but there seems to be a lack of commentary on some of the boutiques other than that they're "top".

bearing in mind it is a personal choice, I would probably go with a boutique in this market, primarily because they have less short term questions regarding liquidity/health, they aren't going to be involved in any crazy socialist plots that poison an office atmosphere (I'm looking at you Obama), and you'll be able to leverage that experience just as well if not better (ditto on exit ops).

The downsides of boutiques are lack of a brand name outside finance, and more variability in terms of deal flow and experience. I don't think I can speak to culture or lifestyle, and that is more of a firm to firm comparison than a boutique to bb comparison anyway.

You're right though, it has been beaten to death, and I think both offer great opportunities

lucky are the few that have the chance to choose between the two.

Right now, with Moelis at #10 for the year in M&A advisory, I'd say that would be the place I'd most like to be right now. Those places can use alot of banks to finance, while a BB might have to let a deal go because they can't finance. If I had a choice between GS and Moelis, it would be Moelis

i would go with a boutique because: 1) they'll still be around, and 2) they'll actually pay you.

who knows if the BBs are going to be paying bonuses next year or if they'll even be allowed to--in this environment, that means that you're going to be seeing the best MDs jumping ship to the boutiques. This is only going to strengthen their franchise.

I'd run to an elite boutique if I had the opportunity.

I'm going to a boutique - some of the advantages are going to the Christmas party, and knowing that they'll still be around in june. theres comfort in knowing that your bank is well capitalized, and is maybe even opening a new office in the new year, along with picking up some senior guys from the BBs

If I had an offer at a place like Lazard, I'd jump straight on it and would at the least be very torn between choosing offers between that and an offer to a group like say Goldman TMT.

The Lazard analysts I've talked to (about 4) have all spoke well of their deal flow even though it has slowed down. Keep in mind that 2 of the people I worked in were in FIG and therefore have been very busy these past few years.

i just boutiqued in my pants

110% elite boutique.

Right now I want the best experience, and with Moelis at #10 only a couple years after being created, I would say this place is pretty sweet. Obviously your gonna get ripped a new asshole, but thats what being an analyst is all about to me. Right now I just wanna get my 10,000 hours of experience, and to me Moelis is the best way to do so.

This is just me dreaming, my offer is at a reinsurance company's new Investment Bank, but that is just my opinion.

MoCo looks like they were 20th for full-year 2008 M&A volume.

I think the one thing people are missing the boat on the large BBs are the fact that you do really get a broader experience working at one. You have full exposure to all products and advice, from large private placements to IPOs (I know, not often right now, but still), debt offerings, etc. If you go somwhere like Gleacher, MoCo or Evercore, you are going to get a great M&A experience, likely get paid as well or better than the street, and perhaps have a better work environment. That being said, there is more to banking than just M&A and you can learn a lot of that by going to a BB.

Additionally it really depends on the groups you're going into. If you are passing on GS TMT to go work at Lazard's MM practice because you think you've got a better shot at getting a big bonus at Lazard, you are a fool. Compensation should be the LAST thing you thing about when coming out of undergrad. Working for the best group and best culture you can find can lead you to opportunities at PEs and HFs where you can make over $200k per year, at which point I don't think you'll mind that you ended up with a bit smaller bonus than you would've at a boutique that paid a bit higher than the street.

Not saying don't go boutique, as they have a myriad of advantages. But I think it's a bit of capitulation fear around here that suddenly places like GS, MS, etc are going to start paying people $55,000 a year to work 90 hours.