EV Bridge items and purchase price (SPA)
Why is this such an area of debate for buyer/seller, given the buyer will pay the EV regardless of how it is split as determined by equity price and Net debt. E.g. buyer wants to identify item X as a liab, because that reduces Equity price (EV - ND)
Is it because in the event the buyer pays excessively for equity price (the amount actually received by the seller) it may end up litearlly realising it has outstanding debt/liability balances to pay off, which come at an extra expense and therefore essentially they have to pay more?
Laboriosam perferendis tenetur ipsum odio. Perferendis earum incidunt voluptatibus. Aperiam et nemo ipsum deserunt excepturi nihil culpa.
Veniam ad iste minus eaque eaque consectetur commodi officiis. Eveniet et modi dolores dignissimos aut. Illum eum ab quos cum dicta sapiente. Optio rerum amet deserunt ut voluptatem omnis tenetur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...