FINRA Series 79 & 63
I've noticed that some small boutiques that are FINRA members do not have Analysts/Associates with a Series 79 or 63, aren't these required to work in IB after a year or so? If anyone could shed some light on this I'd appreciate it.
I've seen it at a decent amount of boutiques, but they were all M&A focused. You are right in that it is required, but my understanding is that its more strictly enforced for firms that issue securities (e.g. IPOs, or equity-related items, and whatnot).
My firm, along with other boutiques that I know of, that operate a bit looser, only focus on M&A. The way its been explained to me, as to how its somewhat justifiable that Analyst/Associates not be licensed within the 90 day mark, is that the boutiques tend to set up their deals as an asset sale, as oppose to a stock deal. If its stock deal then you're technically selling securities, and therefore need to be licensed. But if its an asset deal, then its not a security, and it falls in this gray area, which is not in direct violation with FINRA. With that said, its still a fuzzy line - its not a blatant in violation, and its somewhat defensible, but is still tricky.
That's how its been explained to me, and I'm sure there are more considerations that I'm missing.
Et ipsum sed quos enim. Reiciendis eaque quo culpa id molestiae culpa quae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...