What is the role of an analyst at your firm?
Was curious to see how much variance there is in the role across firms. When I was an analyst, I'd say my split was 50% analytics / 25% PPT / 25% process support. When I say analytics, we were responsible for holding the pen on modeling, all data cuts or analysis, and any type of buyer requests or responses. Associates would really only review analytics work and guide us and focus more on shelling out and directly writing for decks as their main role in the deliverables processes.
At a different firm now and noticed it seems like our analyst's time split is about 25% analytics / 50% PPT / and 25% process support. The analytics is pretty much exclusively spreading financials and basic data cutting and analysis. Associates are expected to handle all modeling and anything intermediate or advanced on the analytics side.
Don't really have a problem with this one way or another but just seems like such a stark contrast to when I did my analyst stint and seems like they're focusing a ton more on building decks than I did and less analytics. How much does the role vary across other firms because I can definitely see pros and cons to both approaches.
Based on the most helpful WSO content, the role of an analyst can vary significantly across firms, depending on the firm's size, structure, and focus. Here's a breakdown of analyst responsibilities and how they might differ:
Analytics/Modeling:
PowerPoint/Deck Building:
Process Support:
Firm-Specific Variance:
The differences you've noticed—such as a shift from analytics-heavy work to more deck-building—highlight how firms prioritize tasks differently. Both approaches have their pros and cons: - Analytics-Heavy Roles: Provide stronger technical skills and modeling experience, which can be valuable for future roles in private equity or other buy-side opportunities. - Deck-Focused Roles: Offer exposure to crafting client deliverables and understanding how to communicate complex ideas effectively, which is crucial for client-facing roles.
Ultimately, the variance reflects each firm's operational style and the expectations placed on analysts versus associates.
Sources: Economic Consulting Q&A - Past experience at major firms, PJT Partners Viral Email Finally Hits the News!, Q&A: HF Analyst @ $5bn+ Fund - Breaking In and Transition to Risk-Taking Role, Anyone do both FP&A and Corp Strat or Dev?, How is it to work at a small M&A advisory firm?
Don't know what Analysts do today, but tomorrow they will be generating training data for agents to replace their workloads.
Edit: C'mon, your job is PPT, doing basic math in excel, and answering emails. It's incredibly easy to train an agent to do all of those things in a day.
Ah yes, because clients want to pay millions of dollars to email an AI agent all day...
Tell me how happy you were the last time you needed to talk to someone and had to use an AI chat bot or go through a 5 stage automated phone call to talk to a human.
Stop being so negative & naive by thinking all an Analyst's job entails is "PPT, basic math in excel and answering emails"
Fair criticisms. My snarky comment was definitely a bit ragebaity.
That said, it's worth a conversation on this forum since AI is evolving faster than most people realize and there's a major refactoring of skills that needs to happen in professional services (and software engineering) writ large to avoid massive talent crunches when there's not enough trained people to fill mid-level roles.
"Ah yes, because clients want to pay millions of dollars to email an AI agent all day..."
Do clients want to pay millions of dollars to email a 22yr old with 6 months of experience?
No. They're paying for an outcome. Whatever gets them there cheaper and faster is better for them. If you can cut the time to get work done and shave fees, I don't think clients will care if they're no longer talking to that fresh college grad vs. a highly responsive agent for tactical deal items.
"Stop being so negative & naive by thinking all an Analyst's job entails is PPT, basic math in excel and answering emails"
I only sound negative to people that fear change. This is happening whether we like it or not. You can probably automate 80% of the work an analyst does today with a tool like Viktor.com.
If they're not primarily doing PPT, excel modeling, and emails, what else are analysts doing? I'd love to know your answer to OPs question.
To analyze stuff
Worked at BB in LevFin – analysts worked on pitches all day, did a lot of grunt work, and basic modeling. Hours were long due to pitch work.
100% - do everything on my deals & carry my r*tarded MBA associates
Fugit sequi iure quae sed nihil. Est ipsam rem officiis ducimus. Voluptate nesciunt enim fugit qui consectetur nulla. Ex et beatae eveniet voluptatem sit vero. Praesentium temporibus inventore magni odio.
Reprehenderit impedit neque commodi tempora voluptas autem. Dolore nisi voluptate quia repellendus. Cupiditate quas placeat quia praesentium quisquam mollitia ab.
Ipsa laboriosam sunt ipsam. Modi nobis odio praesentium cumque. Quod dicta aut eum quia doloremque. Esse nihil voluptas voluptatem sit. Et quibusdam tempora error nesciunt corporis. Corporis unde vitae ab rerum rerum voluptatem inventore. Voluptatem eos occaecati voluptas.
Pariatur blanditiis eos est mollitia. Deleniti molestias incidunt illum. Fuga dolorem quia officia exercitationem sapiente eum magnam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...