Fintech valuations

Morning all,

Quick question for anyone with experience in fintech or early-stage FIG company valuations.

What are the relevant multiples and what are the numerical values of relevant multiples for a 'startup' lender? A multiple on forecast gross interest income? A multiples on estimated loan book value?

I'm doing some reading online, but haven't found anything particular helpful.

Thanks,

8 Comments
 
Best Response

It's extremely tricky and it will depend on what the company's business model is. Are they lending from their own balance sheet or are they comparable to a P2P lender, e.g. Lending Club? Corporate or retail clients? Long-term lending, credit cards or payday loans? Etc. If it's a bank-like business model, you can forget any topline-based multiples, they're virtually meaningless due to the way the business makes money. You'll have to take an earnings-based approach, e.g. RoE/ P/(T)BV regression analysis, comparing your target to listed peers. For an intrinsic value of the company, you can refer to a DDM. Unless it's an actual lender in the sense of a bank, revenue or EBITDA (depending on maturity of the company) are legitimate. Careful with 'operative' valuations such as loan originations, as the post above says, not all loans are equal. Similarly, the size of the loan book won't tell you much about the value of the company.

 

This market is particularly interesting since it’s a hybrid of several industries. Firstly, the assumption is that you’re talking about “FinTech” in the sense of Alternative lenders, and not SaaS based companies. Quick comparables would be I.O.U Financial, OnDeck, LendingClub Etc…

FinTech Companies will resemble FIG industries as they’re BalanceSheet driven. Which means that it’s not revenue that drives growth, it’s their balance sheet (AR) to be exact. There are a few arguments for why certain multiples can or cannot be used, some are agreed on and some are personal preference.

Revenue – Can be used, though “excess spread” (interest income - cost of capital = Net interest income) is a more accurate multiple. (Revenue-cost of revenue) Net revenue Multiple.

EBITDA – No…..

DDM – You thought it was a joke in school, though THIS IS FIG. what do shareholders get? There is no FCF… any profits get re-invested to originate new loans and so you may pull a dividend at best (though doubtful) it’s also impossible to know the growth rate (though you can build a 2 or 3 step DDM model.

Price/Book – Pretty standard. The book value of equity tends to be small as these firms are often highly leveraged and so if you can get a good comp set it’s not the worst option and often used.

Finally… Book run-off. think of it like salvage value. Basically, if I bought up the portfolio and ran it off until it no longer existed without funding new loans.. what would it be worth? Collect interest and principal, pay back debt, keep cash, wind down G&A until you close up shop… discount to today and what’s that worth? A similar approach is securitization if say OnDeck bought your portfolio, how much would you get from it (value like a bond).

Good point also about originations, though be careful with this since it’s often wrongly represented for investors. Originations should be the new FUNDED amount. Though often time, if someone renews a loan, say $100K goes down to $50K, and then next year they bring that loan back to $100K, the lender will count this as $100K origination when in reality it should have been $50K.

If anyone has questions.. I'll try my best to answer.

 

Thanks for taking the time to write such a detailed response, tiptop. As I mentioned above, we're going to go with a blend of P/BV and operative/KPI-based metrics.

 

Ratione nobis aut nobis. Voluptatum optio non maxime quia quia. Vel doloremque ex saepe vitae odit rerum. Est voluptatibus quia accusantium aut nam exercitationem maiores.

Ratione in dolores et itaque dicta saepe excepturi. Odio explicabo id omnis mollitia fuga qui error ipsum. Reprehenderit est aut quasi deserunt eius. Et modi cum aut velit sunt officia illum. Suscipit et magni quo necessitatibus ea officia rerum. Sed explicabo tempora molestias. Sunt eaque nihil impedit corrupti ad temporibus nulla officiis.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”