Greenhill Rx vs EB M&A
Feel like Greenhill has been on the decline despite Rx being topical. If I plan on going to PE, exits from EB M&A should still be better, no?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +85 | What does JEF banker always think they’re EB? | 38 | 3h |
| +72 | PWP acquisition by Piper cancelled | 28 | 22h |
| +65 | Is my MD a grifter? 16 years, 8 firms | 25 | 18m |
| +55 | "Corporate & Investment Banking" Analyst - Why? | 40 | 15h |
| +47 | MS / GS IBD ACs London interview processes run by nationality? | 43 | 18h |
| +43 | No return offer - UPDATE. | 12 | 2d |
| +41 | Article: UBS Wall Street Rebuild Is a Study in Management Failure | 7 | 3d |
| +40 | Moat of modelling in PE/Finance completely vanished; | 12 | 16h |
| +31 | What Are The Best Boutiques 2026/2027 | 16 | 1d |
| +29 | Lack of talent in IB! | 25 | 1d |
Career Resources
Personally would take EVR / MOE / CVP / Q M&A > GHL RX
What about BBs like BofA/Citi or other EBs like Gugg/PWP
GHL RX still has a strong rep and placements are decent so would give them the edge over the lower tier BB and EB like PWP and Gugg if you are optimizing for PE exits and are only looking at the GHL RX team (not M&A)
For PE exits GHL RX still has an edge over those, especially when you consider the group placement risk at BBs like Citi or BofA
honestly this doesn't tell the full story, doubt anyone is taking a jeff/ducera over cvp/moe/gugg. as long as augustine has a pulse and is calling ppl to get his juniors placed it's still going to be better exits wise than what dealflow suggests. still would suggest taking EB M&A over it in most cases
This is debatable. MOE LA / SF / NY (specific groups) and CVP are universally better for exits especially if you’re looking for tech. MF exits are not uncommon out of those shops, wouldn’t lose sleep accepting any of those over GHL RX if you’re looking for MF / UMM. Agree on Jeff and others, no doubt GHL RX>
my bad, meant to say taking jeff and to a lesser extent ducera for culture over the other 3 for rx specifically
Congrats on Moelis SF aka Moelis Toronto!
Yeah exactly. And for their size Intrepid is better too
One quarter of fees doesn't change HH or PE seniors perspective of banks
?
The only EB that you would consider GHL RX over is PWP, and this is still debatable. However, taking GHL RX over any of the non-GS/MS/JPM BB would make the most sense for maximizing PE exits.
PWP exits are very mediocre to be fair. Sure, some might get MF/UMM but it's far less consisent compared to GHL RX that has less variations across its exits. PWP is still a great bank though so wouldn't split hairs here.
Would take EB M&A.
I work in rx and green hill is virtually non existent now.
GTCR was a penn guy so he was gonna get a UMM look anyways and the Apollo HVF guy didn’t even get the interview through the headhunter. He got lucky.
Explicabo explicabo consequatur sed ducimus facere. Consequatur qui quia officia rerum harum aut. Et hic aut impedit. Adipisci ad corrupti magni sit. Ut rem ut ipsum voluptas ab ut. Qui provident itaque inventore tenetur eum est. Cumque ab exercitationem et temporibus.
Fugiat officiis molestiae id. Dolorem velit quam ex repellendus. Iure dignissimos ducimus in officiis impedit sint velit. Veritatis fuga et blanditiis aspernatur totam consequatur. Laborum nihil et omnis nemo et est. Et a in voluptatem dolor sunt.
Rem magni earum ea vero voluptatum rerum. Impedit eum temporibus omnis quis quo velit sapiente. Enim ut sed voluptas soluta sapiente repellendus et. Sed consequatur ut aut voluptatem nam.
Voluptatibus est explicabo perferendis qui. Ullam labore qui et voluptatum. Beatae voluptate omnis doloribus nemo dolorum nulla voluptate. Voluptatibus sint similique molestiae voluptatem sunt mollitia. Quia amet quia sapiente est doloremque amet quia.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...