Hiring at Goldman Sachs: Analyst track vs. lateral hire?
I'm a bit confused about the pros/cons of applying to Goldman Sachs via the analyst track or as a lateral hire.
My situation: * I have a PhD (almost finished), MS, and BS in STEM fields. Interested in moving into IB or MBB consulting. * I have ~2.5 years of work experience in gov/industry role between my BS and MS. * Spoke w/ a recruiter recently and was told that I could likely choose which route I wanted to apply through (analyst track or as a lateral hire).
Would I start as a 1st yr analyst or something higher up? What qualifies someone to start at an Associate level? What positions are typical for lateral hires with my experience? What should I consider when choosing how I apply, as I still don't know a ton about the firm? (I wasn't really considering GS or IB in general until a GS VP reached out to me saying I should consider it.
Would imagine the PHD does qualify you for associate level, as MBA hires are always at the associate level. Analyst / associate program will have better training so I would recommend that unless the lateral is in your target industry.
Thanks! The VP I spoke with said I would "probably come in through the analyst track" unless I wanted to go the lateral hire route, so that is why I was confused. I had read that PhD would probably be treated like an MBA, like you mentioned. But I get that they might not count it since it's in a non-finance field.
Voluptatibus perferendis sint id culpa itaque. Enim natus ullam est assumenda consequatur et sed nam. Dolor autem at deserunt. Et voluptatibus animi quibusdam et. Earum non soluta maxime illo quisquam ut.
A tempore magni est vel incidunt nisi rerum. Et distinctio inventore et est inventore possimus. Ut unde enim dolorem dolorum eos.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...