How is EV not affected by non-business operations factors?

Was looking through Rosenbaum & Pearl where they say "multiples based on enterprise value are widely used by bankers because they are independent of capital structure and other factors unrelated to business operations (e.g. differences in tax regimes and certain accounting policies)." 

I understand how enterprise value is cap structure-agnostic, but how do tax regime differences and certain accounting policies not affect EV (compared to market cap/equity value)? The text seems to be suggesting there is some sort of difference between the two when it comes to these factors, but if enterprise value = Market Cap + Debt (& Equivalents) - Cash (& Equivalents), where does this come into play?

Is this because for EV/EBITDA, you use a financial metric (EBITDA) unaffected by tax, D&A (and assuming certain other accounting practices are also adjusted for because EBITDA is non-GAAP and more a standardized financial metric in the finance world) to compare between companies?

Thanks!

1 Comments
 

Blanditiis sunt sed facilis eveniet repellat. Facilis ad iusto doloremque fugit inventore autem. Sit tempore iusto atque autem praesentium. Laudantium necessitatibus quia aliquam aut rerum et ad.

Esse corporis quidem ea commodi. Iusto unde dolorem ullam. Non corrupti inventore eligendi excepturi enim. Dicta dolores ut eligendi itaque odit. Libero recusandae perferendis iste facilis.

Reiciendis voluptatem et vitae repellat hic optio. Sit ipsa est enim possimus autem debitis facilis veritatis. Ratione harum sit vitae animi adipisci ut et libero.

Minus dolore odit ipsum necessitatibus. Et rerum quia neque non recusandae. Aspernatur architecto et id at esse commodi delectus voluptatibus. Nesciunt necessitatibus ut aut ad qui omnis. Suscipit deserunt necessitatibus error laboriosam eos.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (53) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”