I absolutely hate writing CIMs. Do you still need to write these as an analyst at a larger, more established firm?

Hi everyone,

I'm currently working at a boutique that is focused on the LMM. As I only recently decided to switch into finance, I interned for a month at another small LMM boutique before switching to the one I'm currently FT. I just finished my first month. I'm not sure if this is an issue that is specific to LMM companies, but I've been asked to write full CIMs at both of these firms and I've had a hard time with both of them for a couple of reasons:

  • I don't believe in the companies. There are typically aspects of the companies that sound extremely bad
  • The materials they send usually have horrible grammar
  • The materials are usually full of marketing words that exaggerate parts of of the company without going into the details of the company. For example, in response to the questions that I sent them, the company that I'm currently writing the CIM on sends me 10 audio recordings of them speaking about random things about the industry without answering my questions.   

I would like to know if analysts even need to write CIMs at larger firms. If they do, is it a more straightforward process because the more established companies in the MM+ have better materials that you can use to learn and write about the companies? So far for me, this has been the absolute worst part of IB.

14 Comments
 

Take the info you have- but that's not enough. Create a list of follow up questions- what you've been given is just the preface to writing something up- the jumping off board. Ask a couple of broad general questions as a follow up and get on the phone with the CFO or let your senior guy ask the questions but include you in the call. That should help answer your questions about the company or clear up with information that is making you "not believe" in the company. 

Like the unadjusted- only with a little bit extra.
 

You don't just throw whatever the company gives you into a deck and call it a CIM lol. It's a selling document. Your banker needs to give you an outline with 5 or so salient "investment highlights" to hit. Those come from the raw data and wall of information that your client shares. This is part of being a sell-side advisor, advising the company as to how to position themselves best for a sale.

 

Work at a bank with dedicated product groups and you don't have to work on CIMs. Group I was in was dedicated entirely to modeling and execution of live transactions. Coverage teams did all the CIMs, comp spreading, and relationship management. 

 

Be curious for the PE bros, how much do people even read a CIM? I'm convinced 90% read investment highlights and look at financials then blast due diligence questions about whether that info is in the CIM or not

 

Not in PE but in Corp Dev I can assure you I read every CIM 2-3x cover to cover. Usually when we pitch the acquisition opportunity to our C Suite many of the questions answered are covered in the CIM. If they are not, we likely already have them on a list to ask the bankers. Can't speak to PE of course but I would assume most Associates are responsible for fully digesting the CIM and being able to answer questions confidently from their VP or MD on if certain things were discussed within the CIM

 

The prevailing assumption when I was doing PE was that most of the CIM was fluffy bullshit, but understanding the make-up of the management team, customer concentration, and financials is key. It's an incredibly important document, but the more artsy shit you put in there, the more skeptical PE buyers are going to be, and the more likely it's going to be a pass.

 

Voluptas atque reprehenderit aspernatur quasi et repudiandae beatae. Neque sapiente quam qui eius in. Et qui earum a voluptatibus natus magni beatae. Aliquid impedit fuga quia voluptas possimus quia autem.

Illum nulla maiores molestiae aut quae et et et. Soluta impedit iste neque quam. Voluptatem voluptas facilis maxime distinctio. Nihil praesentium omnis voluptatum quibusdam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”