IB VP or Associate to PE -- is this a thing?

I keep reading about the "normal" path to PE, which seems to be 2 years as an IB analyst (with super early PE recruiting), and then PE. But what about for those who want to give IB a fair shot, as in doing it for multiple years? Is this doable? To make the move from IB to PE as either an IB associate or VP? Or are PE shops only interested in IB analysts and MBAs?

Thanks for input.

 

Do you think this is because of choice by IB associates or VPs -- that they don't want to leave? Or because it's very difficult for them to transition to PE at that point, even if they want to do so?

 
Prospect in IB-M&A:
Do you think this is because of choice by IB associates or VPs -- that they don't want to leave? Or because it's very difficult for them to transition to PE at that point, even if they want to do so?

difficult to. its not path and analysts with 2 years experience are the perfect monkeys to do grunt work for PE.

While most associates and VPs wont be able to make it even if they want to another thing is that quite a lot dont want to even go. They are making solid money and their hours aint bad compared t o the analysts. So for them PE isnt the green grass on the other side

im not saying they (esp post MBA associates) wont take it if they have the choice but they arent as despreate to get out

 
Most Helpful

IB Associates wouldn't end up at a mega fund, so a lateral to a PE Associate role would be a significant drop in pay. On top of that, you're starting over as the low man on the totem pole as an Associate, in most cases with a two year clock ticking over your head before you're likely kicked out. The best you could hope for is to make a Senior Associate role which isn't as lucrative at the vast majority of shops as IB Associate, so you'd be grinding as an effective Analyst at an IB Analyst salary for two years just to hope to get the Senior Associate role to basically be back at the same level (probably less) than what you were making as an IB Associate.

Assuming you're an IB Associate 1, in that time you could've went to IB Associate 3 with a path to getting promoted to IB VP. Every year you would've gotten a pretty big bonus (this year excluded), gained responsibility and increasingly gained the ability to push work down to Analysts, further improving your work life balance.

So from a pay and position perspective there is very little incentive to go from IB Associate to PE Associate. It's just not nearly as lucrative as for Analysts, and is in fact a significant step back with high risk to even claw your way back to where you were before.

Everyone in the industry can also see where returns are trending. IB Associates won't go to mega funds, so you're going to be most likely to go to some mid market fund or smaller, and competition in that space for deals is insane. The upside in the mid market has been coming down meaningfully and is arguably a secular decline in returns and comp. In comparison to that, investment bankers are always going to be around, deals are always going to get done and fees aren't going to move meaningfully on a TEV % basis from where they're already at.

Pair that with the fact that the interest in people going into banking has significantly declined over the past decade, and with improvements to "culture" and "work/life balance" (though much of it is bs, there have been meaningful improvements on this front since 2007), and you have your answer. Even if an Associate were qualified to go to PE (which in itself is uncommon), why would they?

 

Wow, awesome stuff, really insightful. Great to hear the practical pros and cons on such a granular level. Have not anyone break it down this way, thanks!

 

So do you believe going the IB -> PE path is only worth it if you join a MF right after your IB analyst years? Or do you think staying in IB long-term is better (from a compensation, lifestyle, responsibility perspective)?

 

I'm not making a generalization about IB vs. PE, I'm just saying how a typical IB Associate would view lateraling to a PE Associate role. It's almost like going from a bulge bracket / elite boutique IB Associate to a first year analyst at a mid market bank. From a comp, lifestyle and career outlook perspective, it doesn't really make any sense.

The only reason you'd really do that is if you have an intense burning passion for PE - so much so that you're willing to suffer through everything I've mentioned - or you've got a unique opportunity, such as getting in on a firm that just raised their first fund where the partners are rock stars in their field or something. Otherwise, generally speaking, it doesn't make a ton of sense. And I don't buy that PE has better lifestyle either; I'm sure there are some funds that are like that but when you're in a deal you're still beholden to your deal deadlines and the work that just needs to get done.

 

Know this is an old comment, but curious if in a market like today, whether making a move to PE would be safer than trying to stick it out in IB? Seems like the lean teams in PE means it'd be harder to cut people, bonuses should be more stable due to AUM and deals will have to eventually get done with dry powder piling up. On the other hand, banking is starting layoffs and can continue to do so if the market continues to weaken and there's no guarantee of deals and fees coming in. 

 

A2A is meaningfully different for MF PE. As mentioned above, MM/LMM PE funds don't attract IB associates because pay is a meaningful step down and it's a lot riskier for an IB associate to make that move. 

On the other hand, MF PE basically has their pick of who they'd want to hire (and MBA IB associates will likely jump at the chance to join MF PE) but they don't hire IB associates due to 2 things:

1. There's a lot of risk an MBA associate not having the requisite modeling skills, regardless of whether they're new or an As3.

2. Funds that require MBAs lose the optionality of having an associate go for an MBA before deciding to bring them back as a VP

When you're an A2A, neither of those concerns apply to you so you're basically on an almost level playing field as anyone else doing off-cycle recruiting, with just a couple of questions to be asked about why you stayed on in IB. As you mentioned, A2A to MF PE isn't common but high quality MM/UMM exits are pretty common for A2As

 

Aware of one healthcare PE shop that hired a post MBA associate/VP at the VP level I believe (may have been a senior associate hire and promoted soon after). Subpar performing firm in a Tier 3 city though.

Honestly the PE VP was probably making more at their IB gig (a top paying firm) but technically has more upside (heard their current fund is doing poorly, overvalued some acquisitions).

Edit: Above PE VP is now a Partner at same firm they joined.

Personally would stay in IB over PE if you're entering at the Associate/VP level. Occasionally, IB MDs who have strong financial sponsor relationships may jump into an upstart MM PE firm or in some cases start their own LMM PE fund with a first fund of $100-500 million. But the ones I'm aware who pulled this off were either rainmaker at top groups or viewed as very strong at their particular niche (aware of a MM IB MD in healthcare who had some innovative sell-side/buy sell-side deals that garned very strong returns for UMM/MF funds. Ended up leaving banking to be a MD/Partner at a $2-5 bil AUM firm).

 

To add a bit, I am aware of a VP in IB who moved over to PE. It’s possible, maybe is a thing but not too common. I would think someone who has a IB VP job, moving to PE may not be that attractive given how good IB VP may be. If I’m not mistaken at many of the top banks that VP job may be making like 500k a year all in (rough numbers and I may be off as most of my experience is with EB’s) and a fair bit of that is prob cash. Plus by then at that level their WLB is prob pretty good maybe only needing to put in 60 hrs a week on average or so with plenty of junior support to avoid the worst parts of the job in general. Plus if someone is on path to making MD with a few million a year maybe in comp, able to support nice life with wife, kids, house, vacation etc, PE may not be that attractive of a relative opportunity. But just a thought 

if an IB VP really wants to be an investor they can prov do it on their own by now. I think I know a few VPs who invest in private companies and basically are already like a partner of their own personal PE shop effectively. So they get the fun of investing and do it for themselves while still being a banker. Again just some thoughts. Hopefully it’s helpful 

 

500k total is more like BB vp1. you can easily add 200k to that for EB if not even more.  if you're an EB vp, zero reason to switch into PE considering you'll be looped into profit sharing.  Yes, after carry the VP in PE might earn more but you get the benefit of having mostly cash up front at an EB, which you can invest and compound on your own.

 

Quis ipsa cum vel magnam. Commodi itaque nesciunt culpa esse totam minima perferendis. Molestiae aut voluptas tempore accusantium voluptatum. Autem distinctio voluptate harum numquam.

Consequuntur qui corrupti aliquam sapiente omnis fuga quae expedita. Repellendus et commodi ex mollitia architecto officia. In ipsam adipisci quam quia perferendis omnis. Voluptatem voluptates facere asperiores aut explicabo in aspernatur officiis. Omnis tempora minus aut dolorum dolorem eum voluptas adipisci.

Fugiat aut sapiente ipsa voluptate dignissimos atque. Quisquam quisquam quia illo soluta non. Sit est totam quo eaque quas aspernatur accusantium consequatur.

Omnis sit fuga quam nihil iste ut. Fuga tenetur culpa neque et. Ducimus dolores sunt perferendis eos eos consequatur. Voluptate sunt alias officia et quia aut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”