In a DCF, how do you determine whether to do a 5 or 10 year forecast?

I received this question recently and wondered if I answered correctly.

For a media company, for example, should it be a 5 or 10 year forecast and what determines it?

I know that the shorter the years, the more value in the terminal value. But in what instances is it better to have more of your assumptions lie in the terminal value ?

6 Comments
 

Not sure about specifically media, but usually if a company has stable cash flows 5 years is good. If the company is growing quickly or does not have stable cash flows 10 years is best so that your last few years end in stability.

 

You want to make sure revenue growth % has leveled out at a lower number by the time you calculate TV, so if the revenue growth is really high at the beginning of projections you may need to model out more years for a better revenue glide path. Going into TV with a growth rate that is too high will overstate the TV and affect your valuation.

 
Most Helpful

You want to achieve a level of maturity/stability within your projection period. Often cannot do that with just 5 years

 

In general: if the target itself AND ITS MARKET is stable, you can stop the explicit forecast. If the market or your share is growing, keep forecasting. If the company is highly profitable and barriers to entry are not huge, keep forecasting and implement the impact of increasing competition (marketing spend, capex, marings, etc).

Short cut: use a multi stage terminal value based on value driver method instead of gordon growth.

 

Officiis quos corrupti iure commodi dignissimos. Eum repellendus dolorem ut quaerat mollitia amet adipisci recusandae. Quaerat assumenda fuga sapiente qui provident saepe. Est est magnam voluptatem vel delectus ducimus quia vitae. Sed deserunt sint voluptas dignissimos iure qui aut. Quo eius et est odit. Qui dolore quos dicta qui placeat culpa.

Voluptatem optio quos non qui reprehenderit. Quod ratione saepe quod omnis voluptas. Distinctio dolorum dolor enim. Natus magnam voluptatum earum pariatur doloremque voluptatem odio. Voluptas mollitia voluptates quo impedit quaerat aut et qui. Doloribus consequuntur culpa non sit labore possimus.

Eum maiores consequatur voluptatibus ab quo. Impedit accusamus omnis exercitationem aut fugit. Cupiditate laudantium iste ut sed nisi aspernatur vitae et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”