Interview Question I read from HL

I read an interview question on WSO for HLRX that was "What is the value of Coke's recipe? Whoever posted the question said: "I tried to answer this using a DCF but he had to help me a lot with my assumptions."

My question is: Why on gods earth would you try and answer this using a DCF? I get that you could make assumptions about the FCF/revenues you'd receive based upon the formula - but the amount of assumptions and intangibles you'd have to account for are immense.... Wouldn't a comp be easier to execute?

6 Comments
 

I'm not sure how in-depth the actual question would want you to go into, but assuming it's just a more finance-related version of the interview brain teaser questions such as "how many ping pong balls can you fit in an airplane", you would probably make a very general assumption of revenues, ebitda %, capex, and a very round wacc % (like 10%) to do this.

The issue I see with comps is that it doesn't fully allow you to demonstrate your ability to think through the question. Sure it might be easier in practice if you were allowed to use the internet, but otherwise, you'd need to know the valuation of the other comps anyways, like Pepsi, which is essentially the original question. Without knowing that, how are you going to know what multiple to use? And what financial metric of Coke to multiply that with? You'd end up making the same sort of assumptions, with a much less robust answer IMO.

 

i mean theoretically, everything comes down to a DCF - quantifying it would be whatever incremental fcf (volume, price you can increase beyond more commoditized producers). in the real world, probably looking at the multiple delta between this and someone like pepsi to quantify the intangible value.

 
Best Response

I read an article a few weeks ago about the history of global sales of Coke vs. Pepsi. For the longest time, Pepsi dominated the space because consumers did (and tend to still) prefer the sweeter taste of Pepsi. Coke tried tweaking their formula and came out with New Coke, which was a complete disaster. Coke went back to their original recipe and decided that instead of competing with Pepsi on taste, Coke would compete with Pepsi using marketing. Coke launches a slew of campaigns that were meant to elicit emotion and like Coke to having a good time. The Coke Polar Bears, the idea of sharing a Coke with someone you love, etc. are some examples of these marketing campaigns. The result: Coke is now the market leader in the segment and is sold in many more restaurants and fast food place than Pepsi is.

So, you could make the argument that the Coke formula is worthless to anyone except Coca-Cola. Without Coca-Cola's marketing, all you have is an unbranded sugar water. I would personally have gone with comps, precedents, a DCF, and an LBO to check the "this kid knows how to read an interview guide" box, but then I would have expanded a bit. If all you mention are typical valuations techniques, you won't stand out and are really DOA.

 

Eligendi pariatur unde est incidunt iusto inventore. Beatae voluptatem laudantium voluptatum.

Qui corrupti laudantium et voluptas quo. Delectus dolores repellat sequi amet aut officia libero.

Repellendus minima aut vitae est quia incidunt. Et nobis dolor eum similique odit nihil sit aut. Quo facilis incidunt ea repellat corporis.

Ut itaque asperiores ut consequuntur aperiam. Commodi atque similique optio voluptas voluptates. Voluptatum accusantium ad modi rerum est. Autem dignissimos velit iusto eveniet. Necessitatibus est sed voluptatibus. Consequuntur et vel id pariatur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”