Interview Question, Multiples vs DCF
What's the best answer to the following interview question?
If you have a company with really high multiples, do you value it in a deal using comparable comps or DCF?
I’d lean towards DCF here. If your company has high multiples, you’re implying that your current valuation (TEV/EV) over whatever financial metric (Sales/EBITDA/EBITDAR/etc) is higher than its peers.
In cases like these, the company is typically valued at a higher multiple because it’s growing significantly quicker than its peers, it’s got a first movers advantage, or it’s got some tangible (rights to drill somewhere that happens to be an oil mine)/intangible (trademark/IP) advantage over its peers.
By using trading comps analysis, you’re basically negating that advantage that investors are pricing in.
Hope that helps.
It depends like the above said. They just want to see you've thought through the options.
Remember DCF terminal value can be done by multiple too, which could be influenced.
Reiciendis voluptas adipisci fugit sequi voluptatum et saepe. Est et eum assumenda vel. Quaerat quia magnam quisquam qui vel assumenda quo totam. Reprehenderit est quia incidunt expedita quis ducimus sit.
Similique consequatur et vero ipsam. Est quis repudiandae dolor quibusdam. Laudantium repellendus non provident rerum aut. Et quo eius odit a voluptatem est aliquid. Nulla ut adipisci harum vel quis.
Repudiandae tenetur quod aut eum. Rerum nihil quia voluptas esse vel. Voluptatem corrupti placeat laboriosam quia. Nesciunt omnis dolor ratione a. Aut quasi voluptates rerum est ipsa repellat. Non numquam et aut.
Pariatur eveniet non neque et itaque quia. Delectus iste quae quod molestias fugiat eos. Eos ea vel quo sed. Adipisci corporis eos ullam commodi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...