Hi,
Do you know how can we solve this question:
Thank you again :)
| +161 | Analyst: Why is UBS IB doing worse than peers?, UBS CFO: No Comment | 29 | 6h |
| +160 | UBS Tech layoff | 52 | 2d |
| +146 | UBS’s M&A BANKERS ARE DOING TERRIBLY. $200M EXTRA IS BEING CUT | 31 | 1d |
| +112 | Leaked Interview Questions to Recruiting Services | 55 | 2h |
| +63 | How do YOU manage networking requests? | 20 | 2h |
| +59 | Are target prospects getting dumber? | 27 | 1d |
| +37 | Quitting After First 4 months | 12 | 2d |
| +34 | MBB Pay Raises | 26 | 2d |
| +24 | My new boss told me they have no idea what I was doing? | 3 | 7h |
| +20 | Career Crossroads | 3 | 7h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Up
Up
I'm assuming that "owns 100% of his company" means that there is no debt. Basically he can receive cash flows of $100 that will grow by 2% each year or accept a lump sum of $1250. So it's about finding the cost of equity that makes the DDM equal to $1250 ( = 100 / [x - .02] ). Solving for that you get 10% as the cost of equity.
Theoretically I think it's all about what type of return the owner was originally expecting based on the risk of owning the business. If he was expecting a return over 10%, the cash flows from dividends would be worth less than $1250, so he should accept the lump sum.
Curious to hear others' thoughts on this.
^agreed. pretty much the CF/r equation adjusted to include growth rate.
Facere eaque optio tempora dolorem est provident. Qui sed quis ad voluptas eum dolor vitae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...