Is Guggenheim an EB?
Title says it all. Why or why not? Often see if classified as either a MM or EB. Which is it?
Title says it all. Why or why not? Often see if classified as either a MM or EB. Which is it?
| +328 | UBS Tech MD hires Son (from no-name college) as an Intern | 57 | 20h |
| +269 | Evercore Intern Seizure | 38 | 7h |
| +91 | [Official] 2026 IB Analyst Bonus Megathread (with 2025 Consolidated Pay and Perks/Benefits) | 13 | 43m |
| +55 | JPM M&A is Gone??? Purely Coverage Banking??? | 22 | 10h |
| +54 | Is DCM actually underrated ? | 21 | 19h |
| +46 | Are all Tech / TMT groups sweaty? | 33 | 1d |
| +43 | Losing my personality in Banking | 7 | 3h |
| +39 | Am I behind? 31 Year Old Analyst | 9 | 1d |
| +39 | Associate & Above IB exits | 16 | 2d |
| +31 | Incoming IB Analyst: Best Ways to Prepare? | 8 | 2d |
Career Resources
As far as I know, it’s considered an EB more often than a MM (but these categories are relatively arbitrary)
US - you could say EB. Europe/UK - more MM but expanding (esp digital infra and healthcare), maybe EB soon
What makes it an EB vs a MM?
I would personally consider it an EB if it is common to be doing 1bn+ EV deals but obviously what constitutes “common” is subjective. For example Greenhill doesn’t OFTEN do 1bn+ EV deals anymore therefore I (and I think most) would consider it more of a MM bank
NOOOOOOO. Cmon guys no where near EB. We can’t dilute the word EB!!!
Okay "intern"
No
group dependent — has transitioned to more of a MM strategy since 2020/2021 tho
Putting deal sizes aside, we have a balance sheet so we technically cannot be counted as an EB.
Their HC / TMT coverage groups are solid. Not the best but I think I would consider them comparable with adjacent groups at some of the EBs.
I mean if you have to ask, it probably isn’t
there's nothing wrong with having an MM strategy, gugg interns shilling for the EB name is just cringe lol
Guggenheim and Jefferies both fall into a grey area - I’d brand them a mini-bulge (perhaps half chubs for market purposes); almost akin to the old school partnership model pre Goldman IPO.
Itaque nihil qui ullam corrupti qui voluptatibus accusamus. Aut dolores rerum corrupti voluptas. Culpa autem mollitia et distinctio et aliquid. Ut repellendus totam officia quis. Assumenda voluptas ea deleniti delectus qui quae. Minima sunt sunt dolor enim.
Nemo quod odio maxime exercitationem nisi. Ducimus dolorem dignissimos temporibus expedita.
Eius dolor quam pariatur modi facilis ipsa. Non autem cum similique nemo. Quis autem totam quia sit rerum.
Enim voluptatum illo in aut veritatis eos voluptas. Enim assumenda natus illo. Suscipit illo nostrum vel velit voluptatibus aperiam aut nostrum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...