Is Guggenheim an EB?
Title says it all. Why or why not? Often see if classified as either a MM or EB. Which is it?
Title says it all. Why or why not? Often see if classified as either a MM or EB. Which is it?
| +434 | Is UBS really that bad? | 77 | 12h |
| +265 | Investment Banking is Divine | 40 | 2d |
| +221 | Another $115bn Mega deal for these banks. Congrats! | 46 | 18h |
| +216 | US 2027 SA IB worried about background check | 53 | 2d |
| +77 | Useless associates | 15 | 2h |
| +77 | Which Offer to Accept: UBS Analyst Role or Part Time Cashier at the Local Taco Bell | 20 | 38m |
| +61 | Roku-Fox Deal - UBS Misses Out on yet another deals after years chasing this deal | 10 | 6h |
| +52 | Differences in Restructuring Teams? | 24 | 14h |
| +46 | FIG Pigeonholes you - is it true? | 18 | 32m |
| +41 | Is Houston SA 28 recruiting already over? | 34 | 2d |
Career Resources
As far as I know, it’s considered an EB more often than a MM (but these categories are relatively arbitrary)
US - you could say EB. Europe/UK - more MM but expanding (esp digital infra and healthcare), maybe EB soon
What makes it an EB vs a MM?
I would personally consider it an EB if it is common to be doing 1bn+ EV deals but obviously what constitutes “common” is subjective. For example Greenhill doesn’t OFTEN do 1bn+ EV deals anymore therefore I (and I think most) would consider it more of a MM bank
NOOOOOOO. Cmon guys no where near EB. We can’t dilute the word EB!!!
Okay "intern"
No
group dependent — has transitioned to more of a MM strategy since 2020/2021 tho
Putting deal sizes aside, we have a balance sheet so we technically cannot be counted as an EB.
Their HC / TMT coverage groups are solid. Not the best but I think I would consider them comparable with adjacent groups at some of the EBs.
I mean if you have to ask, it probably isn’t
there's nothing wrong with having an MM strategy, gugg interns shilling for the EB name is just cringe lol
Guggenheim and Jefferies both fall into a grey area - I’d brand them a mini-bulge (perhaps half chubs for market purposes); almost akin to the old school partnership model pre Goldman IPO.
Reprehenderit quo distinctio quis numquam quibusdam veritatis quibusdam. Ullam aliquam id eum eius. Et voluptatem fugiat est sit qui voluptas sequi quod.
Doloremque enim tempora velit iusto voluptas aliquid. Impedit rerum reprehenderit id fugit. Et explicabo qui ullam assumenda. Qui et voluptate doloribus illum quasi nemo ut. Enim et possimus quia et.
Non voluptas inventore nobis. Amet quidem quo exercitationem magnam soluta. Quod nihil et unde at dolore molestiae.
Est et velit dolores asperiores praesentium et ut. Odit magni libero ullam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...