I have a non-finance MS from a target. Looking at breaking into ER and AM specifically.
My guess is that for:
Equity Research - Yes, CFA needed Asset Mgmt - Yes, CFA needed S&T - No, its about P&L
Amirite? Correct me if I am wrong
| +139 | Restructuring: Anti-climactic Experience | 36 | 8h |
| +110 | IB Net Worth / Savings Check | 51 | 7h |
| +100 | Woman who emptied Knicks trashcan on street then stole it was DEI exec, worked at JPMorgan Chase | 25 | 5h |
| +80 | Stop sleeping on UBS - it’s pretty good | 29 | 4h |
| +70 | Hot take: I’d rather be at Desjardins than UBS for investment banking in 2026 | 13 | 11m |
| +56 | 2026 VAULT PRESTIGE RANKINGS | 30 | 1h |
| +39 | AI + Financial Modelling | 12 | 1d |
| +32 | Hardest interview experiences? | 20 | 1h |
| +28 | Summer before college | 17 | 19h |
| +26 | Current State of UBS in North America | 8 | 2d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Yeah basically. With HF/IM obviously under AM. Most useful for Analysts, PMs and ER guys.
Anyone?
For ER, CFA or MBA, a lot of top guys have both. For HF, depends on the fund. More traditional Asset Management = Yes. S&T - Don't know to be honest
If you want to get into portfolio management, it is indeed necessary for you to get a CFA.
In my humble opinion, the CFA is needed if you really want to hone in on portfolio management. As SAC said, It's a fairly common designation in Equity Research.
Asset Management is a bit harder to define though. I know a ton of Portfolio Managers at hedge funds with a CFA, and I know a ton of guys without it. The CFA is a great designation, but it's less important depending on where you are and your role. I've also noticed that "debt focused" shops tend to have more CFAs for some reason. I don't know why, but that's what I've noticed. With respect to more "traditional" asset management, the CFA is fairly common at alot of money management shops - Think BlackRock, Fidelity, Janus, etc. - because it goes hand in hand with their particular focus of managing and "investing" money for long term growth. Same holds true for in-house AM groups that do portfolio management.
In S&T and IBD, I've known more guys who do FICC, LevFin and DCM to have this over the equities guys. I can't explain why, but that's what I've seen.
Sed provident molestiae numquam inventore sit voluptas ab. Labore officia ut et sit. Earum ipsa pariatur aut quia est ut.
Vero laudantium sed voluptatem aut. Natus id fugiat omnis sit. Saepe quidem deleniti numquam ut assumenda et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...