JPM Tech SF Reputation 2021
How is their coverage team currently doing? what were their oncycle placements like this year? any info on culture / comp / exits would be much appreciated
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +293 | I Snuck Into UBS Office And Took A Shit On The Floor | 28 | 1h |
| +287 | TPH V.S. Mizuho [HOU] | 36 | 1d |
| +243 | Why leave restructuring for M&A? | 30 | 1h |
| +228 | Best Power/Renewables/Energy Teams? | 38 | 38s |
| +216 | Houston 2026 Oil & Gas Investment Banking Rankings | 48 | 1h |
| +183 | Centerview HC group falling off? | 30 | 41m |
| +183 | Actual EB List | 27 | 10h |
| +172 | Incoming TPH Analysts Larping as PWP on LinkedIn | 21 | 2h |
| +154 | Shame on you Evercore - SA 28 | 41 | 2d |
| +39 | Predicted 1Q 2027 Story - UBS IB blames Outlook Outage for Down Quarter | 5 | 1h |
Career Resources
Good deals bad placements
could you elaborate on the bad placements bit - do HH view them negatively? is the work not relevant for buyout exits?
They don't do any m&a
Anyone have additional thoughts on this team?
The top of tech is certainly GS/MS/Q but JPM is next in line.
they’re always on fantastic deals, M&A is solid (just completed $5bn buy side for Permira’s acquisition of Mimecast) and they’re on almost every major S-1 (especially software).
the group itself in SF is split between tech coverage and tech M&A, the latter supposedly has better exits.
overall agree with first comment about exits not being as great as you’d expect or relative to GS/MS/Q.
Being on an S1 doesn’t mean much if you arent lead left or Co lead tbh
JPM is good but don’t do tech if u have more options. They’re good in HC, FIG, M&A
Honestly disagree with a lot of the comments above. The tech M&A group has gotten some killer mandates and is definitely not "looked down upon" by HHs. A lot of buyside recruiting is based on personal preparedness and self-selection, and they have placed several to UMM/MF. OP, if you work at JPM SF you'll be fine, but ideally try to get into the M&A group. Other commenters are right in saying that the coverage group is weaker.
am analyst in coverage - working on sick sell-side mandate, but the M&A team owns the model, so fantastic experience so far with exposure to all other aspects of the process, but would have to study up on models if I wanted to go buyside
although admittedly behind GS/Q, would argue that the stats show JPM moving closer toward parity with MS over the last few years - and don't think anyone else has a better claim at 4th
This is biased, JPM is not on par with MS tech.
"moving closer to parity"
Rerum deserunt minus tenetur vel quisquam. Ea vitae ipsa explicabo qui nihil aut a. Ut laudantium numquam repellat et accusamus eius laudantium. Eligendi vel odit et sed ea eveniet sequi distinctio. Cumque veritatis dignissimos magni aut veniam autem qui.
Esse harum autem sed labore at. Sed assumenda voluptatum possimus quaerat culpa mollitia ea. Animi officiis dolorum ipsam magnam.
Sapiente unde alias pariatur sint culpa ducimus. Amet recusandae minus corporis perspiciatis. Alias autem et qui et. Nihil est incidunt explicabo aliquid. Qui beatae nobis at. In aut ratione non sunt tempora. Similique suscipit eos consectetur et voluptas consequatur dolor.
Quas nam ipsa odit amet reiciendis mollitia. Ducimus tempora quam excepturi dicta numquam qui. Facere perspiciatis quam porro est sunt et consequatur aspernatur. Recusandae provident aut nihil aliquid quos.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...