Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +270 | Why UBS Is the Worst Place to Start Your IB Career | 42 | 1h |
| +220 | UBS 2nd Year Analyst Q&A (2026) | 41 | 1d |
| +137 | UBS IB 26Q2 a Disaster! Advisory Revenue Down 23%, Capital MarketsDown 5% | 19 | 4h |
| +105 | What's your craziest "hardo" story? | 18 | 18h |
| +92 | Downfall of Qatalyst | 20 | 2h |
| +78 | Lincoln International Return Offers | 26 | 2h |
| +57 | Wolf of Wall Street vs. Reality: Anyone else feel scammed by the movies? | 19 | 1d |
| +55 | Elite Boutique interview questions | 17 | 2d |
| +43 | so confused about 28 SA timeline | 30 | 1d |
| +34 | Rate my non-target resume | 19 | 21h |
Career Resources
Following
I’ve never worked on a merger in MM or even seen it done by a competitor. Your 80% / 20% split is accurate across the group. Even if you do get staffed on a buyside they are much lower probability of success since you don’t know if your client will have the highest bid. In other words, there’s a good chance you complete your MM M&A stint with only closed sellsides to your name.
There’s not many banks advising on public buying public transactions. That’s what I call a merger, even if they aren’t really the same size, because that’s the situation where you use a merger model.
Sequi consequatur fugiat pariatur nesciunt aliquid iste. Sed quia amet ex. Et et et inventore aut aut reprehenderit. Voluptatem tempora optio velit enim ratione debitis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...