Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +248 | UBS Layoffs (October 2026) | 71 | 3h |
| +111 | Do people still want to go PE? | 34 | 14h |
| +71 | UBS Tech layoff | 23 | 1h |
| +62 | Bloomberg - New UBS Investment Bankers See Smaller Pay Gain on Promotion | 15 | 1d |
| +46 | Think I'm fucking up my analyst years | 16 | 4d |
| +36 | What Differentiates the Best Analysts as AI Improves? | 9 | 1d |
| +33 | Lazard hirevue | 11 | 1d |
| +26 | Ambitious CC Student trying to break into IB | 14 | 6d |
| +24 | Cornell Club T10 Rankings (UPDATED 10/2026) | 15 | 7h |
| +23 | Quitting After First 4 months | 10 | 11h |
Career Resources
Any Financial sponsor is going to be far more lucrative to a bank than a public company. I would also say that firms that use extensive and complex financing are also top targets. If you can consistently generate financing fees, I imagine that (and my bank) looks at those clients as highly favorable - almost to the point of more valuable then some of our M&A agreements.
Fair, but I should have specified M&A clients*
Agreed financing is a huge piece of it here but not quite as interested in knowing who pays the most financing fees... similarly, financial sponsors are great for propensity to do a lot of deals, but they're typically far smaller and also much worse fees. For avoidance of doubt I was angling more towards top corporates
Still Sponsors for M&A (massive sell side volume, plus the occasional buyside advisory).
To answer your real question - which are the corporates paying the most M&A fees - it's the old economy businesses getting carved into pieces. GE, GM, DuPont, Siemens, Samsung, etc.
Sponsors are by far the biggest cash cow. My bank has a few sponsors with really good relationships in my sector and we either get the first look for sell-sides or are on a short list for pitching. Brings way more deal flow then any single company can be (at least on the M&A side)
Sage Kelly's wife.
On a serious note FSG. Check out this source: https://thesource.refinitiv.com/TheSource/getfile/download/2b7c51c4-5df…. They account for the most fees of any group by FAR.
@dante-alighieri-in-coverage
based.
I don't know, I see regularly banks getting fees of +$50mm from large corporates for a single transaction and don't see sponsors doing that many deals in a single year where they pay substantial fees. Either way, question remains. Aside form financial sponsors / financing etc. just straight corporate M&A trying to gauge best clients
I work at a BB in FSG. We make over $200mm per client per year, consistently over the last few years, from our top clients.
We made $65mm on a single marquee LBO we led this year. Total fees to Wall Street were ~$350mm, including sell-side, buyside, and financing. M&A fees made up ~$110mm of that.
Medline paid even more fees.
GE. Think the original article was in FT
https://www.industryleadersmagazine.com/ges-restructuring-has-made-wall…
Quidem pariatur repellendus dignissimos. Alias voluptas eum et suscipit quod. Ipsa voluptas non ea quae. Corrupti et aut voluptatum quos ullam sunt.
Eveniet eligendi minima possimus repudiandae quam et. Itaque cumque similique atque voluptatum. Facere in facilis ut et maiores odio.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...