Hi,
got offers to join MS in a regional office (Paris, Milan, Frankfurt) and Barclays in London. Barclays at a top group, MS is country coverage.
Aiming for a MF exit which are mainly in London.
Currently have a difficult time deciding which offer to take. Any thoughts are helpful!
| +133 | Americas M&A League Table Q2 Updated | 62 | 1h |
| +132 | New Article: Dramatic Slide as UBS #22 (US) & New Leadership Desperately Needed | 25 | 1d |
| +64 | A COMPLETE GUIDE TO SUMMER INTERNSHIP RECRUITING | 12 | 1h |
| +49 | Boutique firm wants access to my LinkedIn? | 40 | 1h |
| +45 | Restructuring: Anti-climactic Experience | 11 | 26m |
| +33 | Investment Banking in Mexico | 9 | 1d |
| +32 | Investment Banking is Hard | 14 | 6h |
| +30 | IB Net Worth / Savings Check | 13 | 37m |
| +21 | Excel macros for QOL formatting | 0 | 5d |
| +21 | Who pays the highest right now? | 12 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
To maximize your chances of a megafund (MF) exit, Barclays London in a top group would likely be the stronger choice. Here's why:
Proximity to MFs: Most MFs are based in London, and being in the same city provides better networking opportunities and visibility for recruitment. Barclays London would position you closer to these opportunities.
Group Strength: A top group at Barclays London can provide better deal flow, exposure to high-profile transactions, and a stronger reputation, all of which are critical for MF exits.
MS Regional Office: While Morgan Stanley is a prestigious name, being in a regional office with a country coverage role may limit your exposure to the larger, more complex deals that MFs value. Additionally, regional offices may not have the same level of connectivity to London-based recruiters.
Recruitment Dynamics: London-based roles often have a more direct pipeline to MFs compared to regional offices. Barclays' presence in London and its top group status could give you an edge in the competitive MF recruitment process.
If your ultimate goal is an MF exit in London, Barclays London in a top group seems like the more strategic choice. However, if you have a strong preference for the MS brand or the regional office location, that could also factor into your decision.
Sources: Choose Between Two Offers (BB/MBB) - Looking for Advice, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investment-banking/ib-vs-consulting?customgpt=1, Need Advice: Citi/Barclays Offer vs. Recruiting for GS/MS/JPM, Non US/Europe IB/PE Overview, Technology IB Coverage Group - Exits, Interview Preparation, etc.
Bump - would really appreciate some advice
Bump
Barclays
Pretty straightforward decision no? If you want MF exit Barclays London. Even at MF regional offices (which hires like 1 aso every 3 years) they mostly hire ppl from the london offices.
How does Lazard London place?
Ass. No decent exits for the past 5-7 years
I‘m not sure, as I could rotate to London after 1-2 years. Don’t know if this interferes with the general recruitment window
Voluptatum maxime sit unde ratione voluptate reiciendis officiis. Inventore voluptatem sunt voluptatem neque voluptatem. Occaecati temporibus doloribus et suscipit quibusdam et. Voluptatem itaque dignissimos quo repellendus ut aut exercitationem.
Ut qui aspernatur placeat. Est et eligendi voluptatum aut perferendis et. Tempore ut exercitationem porro similique qui.
Suscipit reiciendis dolorem nihil est quae quam qui. Sunt quia veniam autem dolor sint reiciendis sequi sequi. Itaque excepturi occaecati quis aut. Cum aut necessitatibus voluptatem aut. Sit ipsum rerum magni omnis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...