n/a
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +277 | Return Rates For Interns Are Falling? | 112 | 6m |
| +123 | Article: Why UBS's Asian M&A bankers are thriving and UBS's American M&A bankers are not | 13 | 1h |
| +114 | I am a drunk MD AMA | 39 | 1d |
| +71 | UBS Offer Day | 27 | 4m |
| +64 | VP Lifestyle at Top BB Coverage Groups | 40 | 2d |
| +57 | An Outsider’s View of RX Banking Out of College | 6 | 5d |
| +43 | No return so what are the options left | 31 | 1h |
| +41 | WF Return offers | 28 | 2h |
| +40 | I hate Wells Fargo | 6 | 17h |
| +34 | No return offer - feeling like a failure is an understatement | 14 | 23h |
Career Resources
Do you have an offer from both?
If PE is your goal, you should absolutely go with GTCR and avoid IB. GTCR is a great fund and dream exit opp for many people. You will learn a ton going into PE directly (more practical investment skills versus the IB analyst routine), and you will avoid the gamble of PE recruiting
.
"and you will avoid the gamble of PE recruiting"
Is this even true though? All of the PE Analyst programs are either new or so small that you really can't tell what a typical career progression looks like. There are a lot of great selling points about the PE path, but higher certainty of outcome is not one of them.
Like another poster said, I would due some serious due diligence with GTCR to find out: what the training pipeline looks like, what exactly you'll be working on, how you'll be staffed within teams, how you'll build an equal or better skillset of an incoming PE associate, etc.
I didn't even know GTCR had an analyst program, but I'd choose Evercore marginally over GTCR with regards to exits, learning, geography, and pay. GTCR is amazing however.
.
.
.
I would do the GTCR analyst program.
If you want to do PE in the future: the experience will be more relevant and make it much easier to become an associate there or elsewhere.
If you want to go to business school: you'll have a more unique profile.
If you want to go to a hedge fund: neither is perfect, but at least you'd be an investor at a fund.
Chicago is not exactly a wasteland - I wouldn't worry about fun vs NYC. Likewise, face-to-face meetings will be tougher for recruiting in NYC, but far from impossible (especially if you're already succeeding in an analyst program at GTCR). It's also worth pointing out that you may not need to bother recruiting at all since you'd already be at a great fund.
No idea as to pay differentials, but unless you never want to go to the buy-side it seems likely that you'd get much better experience at GTCR, which is very valuable early on.
Regardless of what you pick, congratulations on an excellent pair of offers. Tough to go far wrong with either.
Itaque nesciunt nesciunt aut laudantium culpa. Sit itaque ab enim reprehenderit doloribus facere temporibus dolor. Sequi quam omnis mollitia ut. Sit dolore sint sit dolorem ullam. Voluptas explicabo unde minus dolor labore dolorem. Eligendi recusandae enim et eius architecto architecto. Rerum accusantium aut id aut consequuntur.
Eum numquam sunt eum reiciendis. Et accusantium doloremque tempora. Similique veritatis eos natus et.
Labore voluptatem et et corrupti numquam porro. Doloremque ut aliquam et mollitia. Quam similique totam voluptas debitis suscipit corporis rerum. Et sint voluptatum aliquid voluptatem laborum ipsam molestias.
Voluptas cum similique in ut rerum ipsum. Asperiores molestiae saepe sapiente placeat soluta fugiat ratione. Molestias adipisci et perferendis aperiam vitae at.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...