While studying for ib interviews, I have found guides always state the 3 common valuation methods as DCF, Comparable Companies, and precedent transactions; however, while reading an M&A book, the author states the NAV method as one of the most common. Since the book was published in 2001, is NAV an antiquated method or is it still an acceptable and common method? Thanks for your help!
| +139 | Restructuring: Anti-climactic Experience | 36 | 8h |
| +110 | IB Net Worth / Savings Check | 51 | 7h |
| +100 | Woman who emptied Knicks trashcan on street then stole it was DEI exec, worked at JPMorgan Chase | 25 | 5h |
| +80 | Stop sleeping on UBS - it’s pretty good | 29 | 4h |
| +70 | Hot take: I’d rather be at Desjardins than UBS for investment banking in 2026 | 13 | 11m |
| +56 | 2026 VAULT PRESTIGE RANKINGS | 30 | 1h |
| +39 | AI + Financial Modelling | 12 | 1d |
| +32 | Hardest interview experiences? | 20 | 1h |
| +28 | Summer before college | 17 | 19h |
| +26 | Current State of UBS in North America | 8 | 2d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Aut molestias omnis enim exercitationem qui. Voluptatem maiores accusamus est exercitationem quo eos dolor. Modi qui assumenda sint eius et et voluptas. Mollitia at provident optio nesciunt id.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...