While studying for ib interviews, I have found guides always state the 3 common valuation methods as DCF, Comparable Companies, and precedent transactions; however, while reading an M&A book, the author states the NAV method as one of the most common. Since the book was published in 2001, is NAV an antiquated method or is it still an acceptable and common method? Thanks for your help!
| +223 | Return Rates For Interns Are Falling? | 88 | 1h |
| +129 | UBS Americas IB: The Kids’ Table of Wall Street | 17 | 2h |
| +106 | I am a drunk MD AMA | 39 | 3h |
| +63 | VP Lifestyle at Top BB Coverage Groups | 40 | 22h |
| +57 | An Outsider’s View of RX Banking Out of College | 6 | 3d |
| +50 | UBS Offer Day | 18 | 21h |
| +49 | SharePoint makes IB hours HELL | 15 | 3d |
| +36 | WF Return offers | 22 | 2h |
| +30 | Weird Majors->IB ? | 24 | 7h |
| +28 | Most Technical Groups Ranked | 17 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Animi qui modi et ad nemo architecto error. Saepe et dolores repellendus. Explicabo impedit molestiae atque accusantium.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...