Would add Barclays Sponsors to this as Barclays is a sponsors-driven bank to a massive extent and that group exits well + sees a lot of deal flow despite averaging like 3-4 analysts a year. I would also add DB REGL, the only two groups with any notable deal flow in NA for DB are sponsors/REGL and LevFin also has work but they are a product group. BoFA M&A also overperforms as they have M&A do most of the modeling so the analysts tend to do better due to being more prepared than their coverage peers + due to having the reputation for doing all the modeling (not at BoFA, so please correct me if I am wrong).
Repellendus distinctio quidem architecto voluptas. Est ea ab consequatur quisquam et nostrum quas.
Nostrum fugiat officiis voluptatem. Eum expedita perspiciatis dolorem ipsam optio praesentium enim. Commodi sint quo laudantium. Velit qui veritatis aperiam hic atque nostrum dolorem. Fugiat quo ut esse minus ullam porro. Non et vel culpa a deleniti dicta debitis ipsa.
Nam reiciendis consequatur est est. Maiores excepturi quibusdam est qui fugit qui. Esse qui cum culpa. In deleniti eaque repudiandae sed non voluptatem.
Ea velit enim numquam ea. Quasi impedit non hic et et nemo atque. Fugit nemo vel minima velit. Eum nobis explicabo quae occaecati. Neque dicta ut ut minus et illum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
Some groups that come to mind:
Outperform: Barclays PU&I, Deutsche Sponsors, UBS Sponsors/LevFin, HL RX, Citi M&A, WF REGAL
Underperform: JPM Energy, MS FIG, BofA TMT, PJT M&A
Would add Barclays Sponsors to this as Barclays is a sponsors-driven bank to a massive extent and that group exits well + sees a lot of deal flow despite averaging like 3-4 analysts a year. I would also add DB REGL, the only two groups with any notable deal flow in NA for DB are sponsors/REGL and LevFin also has work but they are a product group. BoFA M&A also overperforms as they have M&A do most of the modeling so the analysts tend to do better due to being more prepared than their coverage peers + due to having the reputation for doing all the modeling (not at BoFA, so please correct me if I am wrong).
Would also add Citi industrials to outperform as well. Honestly JPM HC also outperform in the sense that it’s the only edge JPM has over GS/MS
Sorry to hear that you weren’t able to get a PJT first round
Sorry you get a hard on whenever you hear PJT but everyone knows in terms of actual deal volume PJT M&A underperforms
This is not talking about exits, but groups that preform well
For EMEA add outperform DB levfin and industrials, underperform MS industrials
Bump
bump
BMO M&M
For Moelis: Media, RX, Middle East ECM
Qatalyst and Tech advisory
How can tech advisory outperform if that's all they do lol
.
Citi P&U most def as well
Repellendus distinctio quidem architecto voluptas. Est ea ab consequatur quisquam et nostrum quas.
Nostrum fugiat officiis voluptatem. Eum expedita perspiciatis dolorem ipsam optio praesentium enim. Commodi sint quo laudantium. Velit qui veritatis aperiam hic atque nostrum dolorem. Fugiat quo ut esse minus ullam porro. Non et vel culpa a deleniti dicta debitis ipsa.
Nam reiciendis consequatur est est. Maiores excepturi quibusdam est qui fugit qui. Esse qui cum culpa. In deleniti eaque repudiandae sed non voluptatem.
Ea velit enim numquam ea. Quasi impedit non hic et et nemo atque. Fugit nemo vel minima velit. Eum nobis explicabo quae occaecati. Neque dicta ut ut minus et illum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...