People don't care about prestige anymore?
I so often hear about "prestige" in the context of finance / consulting / law-jobs.
But what kind of prestige are you actually experiencing in your day-to-day life? I always felt prestige maxed out in college, where people were literally impressed by others having nice logos on their linkedin as internships.
But in adult life? I see two cases:
- Either you are in your social-bubble where literally everyone went to a target school and is now working at a top bank/top consulting firm. I never really felt in those circles that someone really was impressed that somebody works at GS/McK or BX/KKR - so many people in those circles do and I feel like people are getting more cynical about it (i.e., knowing that people get grinded in such seats and don't really feel a particular envy aobut it)
- If you are not in your social bubble (say during sports, some other activities, neighbours) I feel like that normal people literally don't care about work. It is a general 3-4 minute convo at the beginning "what do you do for work? oh, you are in banking? thats cool - must be good with numbers" .. if it is in dating I feel like both finance/consulting even come with some sort of negative stigma because you get bucketed in the insufferable "finance/consulting"-bro bubble - like its not the 1980s anymore where finance was considered as particularly prestigious/masculine. Most people associate some IG/TikTok personalities now with finance rather than a Michael J. Fox type of character
I am genuinely curious, how is prestige at this point important to you? Prestige meant the world to me in college, but at this point in time it feels like its such an elusive concept. Like literally nobody cares - it doesn't make you cooler/tougher.
Making a decision to change jobs now and for the first time I just try to max out on money and lifestyle rather than brand-name.
Changes as you get older.
Cars, houses, country club memberships, where you vacation, how many kids you have, watches, how much you raise for charity etc.
Only insecure people care about these things. And generally, the more rich people are, the more insecure they are (...funny how that works).
I'm 36 with a house in Los Angeles, a wife, and two kids, and all I care about is that everyone in my family is healthy, safe, and happy.
Any adult, especially a father, that is so into material things after having kids is either trying to compensate for missing out on things during their formative years (i.e. being broke, not getting girls, etc.), or they hate their life and are trying to justify why they work so many hours in such a pointless job (think big law lawyer or IB managing director).
Nothing compares to having a wife, kids, and family that you love.
Prestige only matters to people who do not have this.
High level agree, and yeah a ton of people waste time on material things, but your answer kind of falls into what I was saying too. A house in LA, 2 kids that you keep financially secure are both prestigious and things.
Similar age with two young children - 100% agree
I think the world rewards prestige to those who go into careers that are intellectually confusing or otherwise difficult to enter. It’s not meaningful to me, because those two things are not what defines me. What defines my career satisfaction is my quality of work, if people around me are fulfilling, and if my family is benefitted by my career (both money and in time). Prestige has its place in academia, as it’s usually well deserved and as the products of academia are intangible (other than engineering schools, little different) then prestige is the currency there. Outside of that, I do not care. There are more multi millionaires in non prestigious lines of work than there are in ours, so that kind of discredits prestige
The worth you put on pedigree depends on the social circles you are surrounded by. The “oh you went to HYP? What year?” Or “what years you were at MS/JPM do you know xyz” definitely comes as you get past 30. It’s a networking thing. No intelligent person places self worth on it, but it opens a ton of doors.
Prestige in finance jobs died down a bit as salaries are not as disproportionately high as they used to be (if you account for inflation), and there are more paths and more opportunities out there these days compared to say 10 years ago. Simple as that.
Prestige is not having to work a W2 80 hours a week. The most prestigious people I know surf in the mornings and send two-word response emails from their iPhone.
Some things don't deserve to be said.
Gen Z Banker, it is hard to feel prestigious when information is so readily available.
There's people that sell courses that make more than my MD, and then the most intellectual people work in Quant & AI.
Banking just feels like it's for midwits, me included. Smart enough but nothing special.
Finance and consulting "prestige" will impress other professionals, assuming you are in highly prestigious firms. But I wouldn't put law (or medicine as well) in the same bucket, given that the prestige of those traditional professions is well received by the broader population even if they can't differentiate between working at Skadden or a regional law firm (95%+ of people).
As a matter of fact, the further someone is from NY/London corporate bubbles, the more they'll be impressed knowing you are a lawyer or a doctor and less about IB/PE/HF. Inside those bubbles all those professions will let a "nice" exclamation followed by a question on "what's the name of the company" to assess how prestigious is the job.
So the value of prestige is the social leverage it creates. Does someone treat you better because of this? Do your parents brag about it? Do you get special treatment because of your profession?
I left in this thread my view on why finance is prestigious and not tech (Is Big Tech more prestigious than IB now? | Wall Street Oasis), but In your discussion, I'd say prestige is much more important once you're outside your office and deal with the average Joe, where lawyers and doctors are much more positively receieved (and less hated) than bankers or some HF/PE guy who interestingly feeds the IBs/biglaws.
As a matter of fact, I think generally Gen Z lost respect for lots of professions and even "prestigious" ones because they look down to anyone who works for someone else despite still living with their parents.
"I feel like both finance/consulting even come with some sort of negative stigma..."
This can depend on where you live and who you interact with but part of this stigma is from people who simply dislike the ills that extreme forms of capitalism with no regard to communities/ water/ air quality/ social impact etc have.
As well as the traditional hippies, with social media etc these ills are becoming more widely known amongst people who might otherwise never have thought too much about it.
But yes, in a dating context, there are a certain type of middle class girls (and their friends etc) who won't look kindly on a job for a company they view as immoral (rightly or wrongly).
I can only imagine the growth of PE and AI's current impact (data centers and the like) will only turbocharge this.
Btw I'm still a capitalist before +100 ms.
I think the number in your bank account matters more than 'prestige' but obviously there is a time and a place for it. I certainly don't view 80 hour work weeks as prestigous whether it is for a Sewer Cleaning company or Goldman Sachs (but what do I know).
The madness of crowds definitely has to play a role in how prestige is viewed.
I would say a lot of this has changed post covid. Pre covid, there was a bit more glamor to finance and such. I think in recent years, I've noticed that if you work in big tech, big law, high finance, or consulting, all 4 of which used to be very prestigious, the actual positive payout of that prestige has lacked outside of very specific circles.
Honestly, one thing I'd wager is that social media normalized these careers a lot. It's like, for older folk they don't care, and for younger people they've seen 100s of bankers and such on social media to the point it doesn't feel like a "rare" career the way it used to. You didn't see all that many highly paid software engineers or bankers or consultants day to day, and so their actual roles were more "mystified" in a lot of ways. It was like, "Oh they work at goldman so they must be doing something big and important" but now, they've seen 40 videos from goldman and former goldman employees talking all about the firm and now its lost its glamor.
It's kinda like learning how the hotdog is made.
I guess people simply got to see the reality and not the Wolf of Wall street version
Super interesting take. +SB
Yeah, the mystery is gone.
Instead of telling people that you're in IB/PE/HF , say that you're an amazon warehouse worker and report the results to us. I think you'll quickly recognize how much prestige the job/industry still holds.
I can't speak for older people, but the culture of finance recruiting definitely pushes students towards prestige focus.
These are no longer careers that get you in the top 0.1 percent income.
When we keep having non targets take prestigious roles the role stops becoming prestigious and just more and more what its always been a job. Back when certain banks only hired certain schools and that was it was a prestigious opportunity. As time went on and finance became more accessible with non targets landing shit naturally the prestige wears off and the jobbecomes exposed
I’m not saying it’s good or bad but the thing is a Wharton kid at Goldman and some random kid from a state school at the same firm is crazy. Even look at somewhere like Qatalyst. Once you see you went to a selective school and did someone else grind and end up at the same place as you. You see they didn’t grind for success they grinded to get a job and it might in a way make you question your ability intelligence not in a bad way cuz if you grinded for a top uni you are smart but if you grind for a prestigious job ? Eh I just feel it naturally would make people who go to prestigious school stop caring about prestige
It's not as prestigious to work for someone else in my view. The amount of hours + inflation vs. comp growth, it's more of a suckers game than ever. Not Gen Z, older millennial for context.
Realistically most people cannot work for themselves but even those working at "prestigious" firms in the industries mentioned, I'm not sure what to think given you clearly dedicated a big part of your life to reach that point. And you continue to work a lot for...the prestige? The money? Is the money really life changing?
Prestige is having control of your schedule and time while still living the lifestyle you want. Time is precious and smart people try to buy it back. It's the ultimate luxury regardless of who you are.
Providing a comfortable life for your family while simultaneously being there to watch your kids grow up - is that prestigious?
Very few people really care where you work and maybe won't even remember eventually. Your friends and family will remember the times you were there for them. Because you had the time for them, vs running around a dirty city crammed into public transportation polishing your MD's apple so you can make 100k (net 72) more next year. If that's your idea of prestige well good luck.
because the people who don't need to impress (and can hire those who do need to impress) know the game isn't about prestige but passive income . lol. you think a guy with a Bugatti with 80 commercial properties, 3-4 side businesses, 1000+ acres of land or real assets column loaded and decked is going to worry about running the hamster wheel 80 hours a week like a Goldman or McKinsey guy.
the real rich of the world know titles dont mean jack if youre still labor. goldman and mckinsey shmucks are still hamsters on a wheel. just more fancier wheel.
I've come across a few multi multi millionaires who can shit out 6 figures in their sleep just by signing a new tenant over a phone call.
so while your IB guy was bragging about the 6 figure bonus, the bugatti guy with some no name school but inherited family biz did it over an email
Yeah pretty much man. What I was getting at said a different way. Notice I'm in real estate and not IB for exactly the reasons you listed.
does the bugatti guys last name start with t by any chance
no. that was an example based off a real bugatti chiron owner I met. they own 20-30 industrial warehouses near ports and a huge commercial office complex and other side businesses. none of the family members went to any fancy schools or even look fancy. but theyve just been accumulating real assets for a long time at scale. low profile but very focused on assets game
why does everyone automatically talk about andrew tate with bugattis. its insane that only on wso can people work at gs or go to hyspm and never have seen a bugatti Chiron owner. like it says alot about prestige in general.
LOL wso is so good for entertainment after you realize this.
Largley depends on the people you're talking to. At a NYC networking event, being from a well-known / respected employer turns more heads and opens more doors.
Where I live outside of NYC, no one really cares. A lot of the wealthy families here are small business owners and eclipse what most white collar professionals make at most employers.
del
Most car dealers literally can’t write in complete sentences. Prestige is dead man.
Prestige isn't just about money though, Medicine/ Doctors will always be prestigious just because their entire profession is doing good to others and their role is invaluable.
Sunt ipsum itaque accusantium ipsa. Voluptatem iure aliquid repudiandae explicabo magni quia dolores. Modi eos minus iusto ut enim beatae sapiente. Incidunt omnis voluptatem minus voluptatem est sunt. Nisi aperiam sint fuga cum molestias eligendi saepe.
Aut quidem numquam deleniti modi. Quaerat inventore quod aperiam fuga quia aut. Et odit voluptas modi consequatur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Provident provident asperiores voluptates voluptas. Dolorum sunt et autem quibusdam facere in voluptatem. Nesciunt qui voluptas et at.