8 Comments
 

The only reason EV changes is because it’s assumed any cash will be used to fund the transaction. You have $5m on hand? Great since I’ll own you let’s use that $5m to lower the price tag.

If the $5m is burned or whatever it’s basically like they spent it, so EV is just $55. There are usually closing documents that require minimal change in any financial figures that will materially affect the EV/transaction price between announcement and closing for reasons like this

 

Analyst 2 in IB-M&A

The only reason EV changes is because it's assumed any cash will be used to fund the transaction. You have $5m on hand? Great since I'll own you let's use that $5m to lower the price tag.

If the $5m is burned or whatever it's basically like they spent it, so EV is just $55. There are usually closing documents that require minimal change in any financial figures that will materially affect the EV/transaction price between announcement and closing for reasons like this

Working capital peg, no?

 

i think it stays the same because (excess) cash isn’t an operating asset. Equity value decreases by 5 dollars and the cash decreases by 5 dollars in your bridge, making it a double negative and cancelling out the equity value decrease. EV stays the same, curious to know how u make ur balance sheet balance on the L&E side when this happens tho…

 

As another commenter suggested, Enterprise Value stays the same, whilst Equity Value decreases by $5m.

Enterprise Value is a measure of the value of the operating assets of the business only - in any acquisition, the valuation is anchored around the value of these operating assets (for example, factories).

Suppose that you think the widget factory (operating asset) itself (absent any cash) is worth $20m, and there is also $5m cash on balance sheet. You should be prepared to pay the owner $25m for both operating assets and cash. If the owner decides to pay themselves a $5m dividend before your acquisition, the $5m cash leaves the business, and you should only pay $20m.

 
Most Helpful

Aspernatur neque dolorem est autem autem. Quis provident reprehenderit explicabo voluptatem. Suscipit sit architecto minima quo ipsum. Sit qui a esse atque autem non et repellat. Voluptatibus ea cum rerum ut blanditiis.

Iure ut in nulla quam quos praesentium debitis natus. Similique eaque deserunt sequi voluptatum dicta ad quaerat.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan No 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”