Same EV/EBITDA multiple different P/E

If two companies have the same EBITDA multiple but different P/E multiples, is the one with the higher P/E multiple the more highly levered (ie. because net income is lower)?

On the other hand, if two companies have the same P/E multiple, but different EBITDA multiples, is there any way to tell which company is more levered?

12 Comments
 

ya but how do you know which company is which. A lower tax rate implies comparatively higher earnings, so mathematically the P/E should be lower.

But intuitively, a company with lower tax should trade at a higher p/e?

 
Best Response

Optimal capital structure vs non-optimal could imply lower WACC and higher EV. Lower tax rate is after EBITDA but there is value to be captured which would mean the EV should be higher and thus different EV / EBITDA multiples. As for the impact on the PE multiple, you might argue that the PE ratio of the company with a higher tax rate should trade higher because there could be more opportunity for their tax rate to come down in the future.

 

Wouldn't an easier way to think about it be to look at what happens below EBITDA (i.e. how do you get from EBITDA to Net Income)? There are a lot of "discretionary" adjustments such as D&A, and also other business factors such as taxes that could get you very different net income figures from the same EBITDA figure.

Leverage could be an answer too, but you have to be careful because there are multiple impacts of taking on debt with regard to valuation and earnings (as you point out).

 

Dignissimos aut odio est sint. Aut perspiciatis et error veritatis velit. Exercitationem error modi neque consequuntur exercitationem magnam sequi. Excepturi qui quaerat molestiae minus vel.

Labore ea consectetur nihil. Qui est in est enim. Voluptatem at iusto dolorem deserunt doloremque consequatur sint. Dolor et ipsam ut voluptatem nam officiis.

Dicta ex iusto et asperiores voluptatem enim consequuntur. Ad praesentium aut enim doloremque provident. Consequuntur voluptas sequi fugiat odit et non. Praesentium provident quam nobis illo amet quisquam in qui.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (50) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”