Can anyone offer some perspective on sell-side mandate success rates? In other words, what percentage of sell-side mandates result in a successful acquisition? I've been working at a boutique LMM IB for two years and have seen a lot of deals fall apart and it's effecting team comp so wondering how viable and stable a career path this is. Would really appreciate some feedback.
| +138 | Rumors Search firm Looking for new UBS IB US Leadership | 30 | 10h |
| +51 | UBS in Shambles as Proposed $100k H1B Fee Looms | 9 | 24m |
| +44 | PPE vs Economics Path into IB in London | 11 | 12h |
| +41 | Why is BofA not getting the respect it deserves? | 25 | 8h |
| +32 | Case studies in banking interviews? | 4 | 5d |
| +30 | Breaking into Healthcare IB | 7 | 3h |
| +29 | What Makes Goldman Great? | 21 | 22h |
| +27 | 1st Year Analyst Feeling Grossly Incompetent. How do I learn? | 10 | 1d |
| +27 | If my GPA is 3.97 can I put 4.0 on resume | 10 | 7h |
| +22 | Best Bank to Prey on the Interns? | 14 | 19h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
.
All part of the game and impossible to ascribe a percentage to it - you can gather all the data points in the world, but won't be meaningful as deals generally die due to company / market specific factors over anything else (neither of which you can pull strong precedents for). However, what I will say is that LMM private market deals (particularly ones involving owner-operators that are looking to exit / retire) are less likely to die than deals involving larger, public companies.
Few reasons:
1) Willing seller (assuming transaction value clears selling price, and no bells & whistles tied to the deal structure)
2) Less principals / shareholders to worry about and deal getting voted down (need green light from majority)
3) Broader universe of potential buyers due to target size
4) Don't have to worry about public market dynamics that can sewer a deal (relative values trade wonky assuming all share deal, target stock runs up due to deal leak and throws a wet towel on the process, etc.)
And the list goes on. If you're focused on LMM private companies now, consider yourself lucky as there's a lot more failed deals when dealing clients that BBs / EBs generally serve.
That's great feedback - really appreciate. Any insight into success rates for equity capital raises? I get the sense those are higher.
I made the move from a LMM no-name to a top group at a Blair/Baird type bank. At the no-name, close rate was below 50%. At the MM, close rate was probably ~95%. Groups become much more selective as you go upmarket. Of course the bread and butter for top MM firms is PE sell-sides, similar to the user above when transactions involved public companies the close rate falls.
Thanks that’s helpful. When you say the groups are a lot more selective are you referring to them being a lot more selective about the sell-side mandates / clients they take on? It sounds like better IBs get better clients and subsequently close more deals
Numquam et ut modi dolores consequatur. Voluptas qui et ut deserunt. Officiis id cumque ea dolores hic necessitatibus perspiciatis. Voluptas laborum illum esse ut quae. Quibusdam numquam quia ipsum consequatur.
Sit non delectus delectus eligendi enim ut veritatis. Ut et rerum impedit rerum. Accusantium error modi rerum rerum fugiat. Suscipit consectetur doloribus sed quas dolores rerum et. Ipsum nulla voluptas tempora. Ut sed nemo odit magnam nam ut est. Deleniti dolor rerum id quod.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...