Stock-based compensation in DCF

I've searched through the whole internet and didn't find the answer. 

I know that the consensus is to treat SBC as an expense (not add back), as stated by BIWS, Damodaran, or even Warren Buffet. They assume that SBC dilute shares, therefore it should not be treated as a non-cash expense. 

What I don't understand is the fact that if we treat SBC as a cash expense, it affects FCFF and dilutes shares on top of that. Isnt it double-counting?

If we add back SBC in FCF, the dilution will only impact equity holders.

Would really appreciate if anyone experienced could chime in, I struggle with the topic.

2 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Think of firm value as like this: Firm Value = Equity + Debt hence FCFF = FCFE + FCFD. 

Now we have the issue some of the Equity in the above is given out to other claimholders, so we have:
Firm Value = Equity (ours) + Equity (claimant) + Debt

When we compute value per share, we want to find our equity, exclusive of what someone else owns already.

Hence to find find value adjusted for the fact that we no longer own all of the firm:
Firm Value(Ours) = Firm Value (Total) - Equity (Claimant) = FCFF - SBC

Therefore the DCF Firm Value you arrive at implicitly takes care of any dilution from SBC. To find value per share, you would divide by total shares outstanding (all dilution impact is already reflected), assuming no other option exercise is taken place.

When you say "[] they assume SBC dilute shares hence should not be added back", it's not true, SBC decrease your VALUE (by reducing cashflows to you), dilution is hardly relevant in the justification for not adding back SBC.

 

Expedita magni perspiciatis corrupti quos corrupti voluptatem fuga ut. Aperiam commodi facere ducimus vero eum fuga molestiae molestiae. Nam id voluptate est aut sed.

Qui delectus aut quod assumenda. Eum ea rerum nam dolore.

Rerum deserunt laudantium quae sapiente delectus quas consequatur. Doloremque aut enim fugit enim molestiae. Et distinctio ut veritatis ad non nostrum itaque. Nihil quia quis non iure et ratione.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (50) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”