7 Comments
 

Yes this is possible (someone correct me if I'm wrong though). As an example, say your new TEV is $600 with 200 unencumbered and 400 of collateral. Old TEV of $1000 (100 bank loan, 100 1L, 200 2L, 350 unsecured, 250 equity). Because there's 400 of collateral, bank loan, 1L and 2L are fully covered. The remaining 200 of unencumbered is allocated to the unsecured for a 57% recovery.

So in the above the 2L secured is paid off by collateral but the unsecured is only partially recovered.

Someone please correct me if i'm wrong though

 

I'm sure there are covenants for this (experts please chime in haha). I think probably a lot of factors could make this possible. Junior debt could be at opco level while seniors are at parent co so when thinking about recoveries that could be important (again not an rx expert but just my thoughts)

 
Most Helpful

With debt, anything is technically possible because debt is just a contract made between parties. It's possible that a creditor could write in the debt docs that the debtor needed to send them a video of the CEO hopping on one leg singing the star spangled banner if they wanted to raise additional indebtedness (that would be in the negative covenants section).

I'm using a silly example, but the point is that the answer to your question is yes. You could technically have a piece of debt that had a lien on some asset of the company, but was subordinated to another piece of paper that didn't (you could draft it to say that until the senior unsecured debt was paid in full, the subordinated debt would turnover any form of consideration). Also just to be clear, when you talk about subordination, you need to subordinate yourself to a specific obligation or obligations.

That's all very unlikely though obviously. Who are the people who take security interests? Banks obviously, but generally, it's people who are willing to accept a lower interest rate in order to have a higher chance of receiving par when the company goes belly up. People who take subordinated paper are the opposite, so it's unlikely that you would have a lender who would take a security interest but then subordinate themselves to another obligation.

 

agree with the above. No senior lender is ever going to be cool with taking on more risk with (most likely) less return. This would be reflected in the negative covenant section under liens in the credit agreement. There might be a lien bucket, but bolier plate language normally only permits liens on things like rent and accounts payable.

In some rare cases, a borrower could assume debt of another company without paying it off/refinancing. In which case , anything could happen. But again, most lenders would demand (and I've never even checked a credit agreement because its so axiomatic) that their senior facilites are at least in line with all other obligations aka pari passu.

 

If secured, there is collateral. Recourse to the collateral (security) is exclusive to the secured party(ies) upon default, typically this manifests in a failure to make payment. For example, you can mortgage your house and borrow money to start a meth lab unsecured. When your meth lab gets busted, the mortgage lender gets your house and the unsecureds get dick.

 

Odio quia aut quasi mollitia illum. Et officiis similique alias est at. Suscipit hic sunt libero error. Pariatur deleniti iure voluptatem tenetur.

Sunt qui consequatur facere consectetur. Deleniti architecto cum eligendi repellat exercitationem. Architecto omnis est rerum qui possimus. Nulla libero id earum. Corrupti debitis aperiam in error voluptatibus ipsum. Maiores ratione quia laudantium est voluptas et explicabo.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (77) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (71) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”