38 Comments
 
Most Helpful

CryptoKnight

They're about to get really good with the top guys from Citi recently moving there

I doubt they are able to see any success out of that partnership.

Citi’s entire selling point was “Come to us for the balance sheet”. The upstream team left because of one, main reason in my opinion:

  • New Citi leadership was tightening the screws on upstream lending because of ESG, etc. (Jane is very focused on curtailing lending to businesses such as upstream companies)

Unfortunately the reason the move doesn’t make sense is because Guggenheim doesn’t have a balance the same way Citi did so the bankers will have to pitch something else to stay relevant. Esoteric structures come to mind given Gugg’s strengths but again that’s not what the ex-citi team specialized in.

Another reason I have doubt is Steve Trauber was the real upstream rainmaker at Citi. I don’t know how good Muhammad and team is but there’s a real possibility that the success they had at Citi had something to do with Trauber and he didn’t make the move to Gugg.

If anything this helps other top groups since they get to take away Citi’s businesses. Heard the upstream group at Citi has been in real shambles lately.

 

Agreed. I think they realized without Trauber they can’t survive at Citi so they left to Gugg. Problem is if all of the deals you did included the entire bank and not just your group, you are in trouble at a boutique. I’m especially skeptical of Muhammad. The guy gets promoted in his early 30s to head of upstream and gets 50+ deals done. How much of that was Trauber? Pretty much all of it.

 

CryptoKnight

They're about to get really good with the top guys from Citi recently moving there

I doubt they are able to see any success out of that partnership.

Citi's entire selling point was "Come to us for the balance sheet". The upstream team left because of one, main reason in my opinion:

  • New Citi leadership was tightening the screws on upstream lending because of ESG, etc. (Jane is very focused on curtailing lending to businesses such as upstream companies)

Unfortunately the reason the move doesn't make sense is because Guggenheim doesn't have a balance the same way Citi did so the bankers will have to pitch something else to stay relevant. Esoteric structures come to mind given Gugg's strengths but again that's not what the ex-citi team specialized in.

Another reason I have doubt is Steve Trauber was the real upstream rainmaker at Citi. I don't know how good Muhammad and team is but there's a real possibility that the success they had at Citi had something to do with Trauber and he didn't make the move to Gugg.

If anything this helps other top groups since they get to take away Citi's businesses. Heard the upstream group at Citi has been in real shambles lately.

Agree - ppl hired Citi bc of Trauber - all of the industries I can’t see the old school upstream guys hiring some mid 30’s guy for his “advice” / advisory services

 

Had high hopes because we really liked the team at Citi and expected a similar level of coverage once they moved to Guggenheim....but the coverage has been lacking and in what's been a pretty active 1Q'23 in the upstream A&D market, have not seen Guggenheim on any of the sell-side mandates....maybe they've been the runner-up on a few buy-sides, but hard to make a living that way...

 

Corporis dignissimos harum molestias impedit nobis enim. Voluptas et et aspernatur aspernatur dolorem. Quas rerum corporis necessitatibus in sed dolorum dolor. Est perferendis distinctio commodi velit sed harum earum excepturi. Aut ut enim consequatur rerum. Consequatur et qui architecto culpa dignissimos voluptate.

 

Libero porro velit consequatur est. Repudiandae ea architecto soluta sit quas alias aut voluptate. Et recusandae qui rerum nisi. Ipsam magnam ut molestias et. Mollitia porro sit repellendus earum rerum ipsum. Cum et temporibus omnis non.

Fuga a quos magnam quae et. Corporis commodi illo est laborum. Ad aut inventore in ut corporis enim itaque. Nobis quae eum veritatis repudiandae quia accusantium.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”