Understanding Enterprise Value, Help???

Hey,

I have an interview and I really can't understand why we add debt to equity value on the enterprise value. Doesn't the equity value already automatically discount the debt and thus only the real amount to be paid is left? I read that the buyer always was to pay for the debt but I just can't understand why... 
Does anyone has an example where its more clear?

Thanks

10 Comments
 

So it's basically as if I brought forward all the debt payments I would need to pay in the future if I only bought the equity today?

 
Most Helpful

You buy a house for $100k with 20% down and an 80% mortgage from the bank. Your equity value is $20k, the debt financing from bank is $80k. The house is still worth $100k. If I want to buy that house from you, I can't just write you a check for $20k. I need to pay the $100k that the house is worth of which $80k is debt.

When you are buying a business (or anything for that matter), you don't simply pay the equity portion. When you are selling something, you only receive the equity value.

 

I also don't understand something. There are two competitors, with exactly the same businesses and market cap, lets say 100M. One has 0 debt the other has 50M in debt.

According to EV it's more expensive to buy the one with 50M in debt, for a total of 150M. So why would anyone buy this one if they can buy the exact same business and pay just 100M?

 

If you have company A = 100m market cap + 0m net debt = 100m EV

and company B = 100m market cap + 50m net debt = 150m EV

Then company B has a higher EV, but it is only "more expensive" when comparing the EVs to their respective EBITDAs (or EBITs, or revenues)

If both companies generate 10m of EBITDA, then company B is more expensive (15x EV/EBITDA vs 10x EV/EBITDA for company A)

However, in this scenario we are assuming that the 50m of debt financing has had minimal impact on EBITDA growth for Company B - this is unlikely.

Even if both companies did generate the same EBITDA (so 10m), then why is company B more valuable than company A? (15x vs. 10x) - could be down to a bunch of other factors (historical and projected growth rates, market leadership, proprietary technology, etc.) 

 

Well, it seems that there ir no real reason why I should pay for company B instead of A right? With less 50M I can buy A and get the same EBITDA no? 

So does this mean this situation means company B just spend the debt unwisely and now its at a "disadvantage" to company A?

 

Think of the basic accounting question - when you buy a publically traded company, you're buying all of their assets listed on their balance sheet - which for this example, we'll pretend BV = FMV. 

How did you pay for those assets? Well they were either financed internally / organically, by way of net income and retained earnings (RE) , or they were financed externally with debt (L) or with equity raised in an IPO/shelf offering (CS+APIC).

A = L + RE + CS + APIC

A = L + E

 

Ipsum magni iure recusandae eaque doloremque. Sed quia non nesciunt vero nostrum excepturi molestiae laborum. Earum voluptatem quidem reprehenderit asperiores omnis nihil reprehenderit. Reiciendis repudiandae porro quasi dolore. Nesciunt tempora ipsam maxime id. Qui rem officiis nulla accusamus velit voluptatem quos molestias. Dolor dolore facere non nobis.

Aut dolorem qui possimus enim et eligendi ut. Excepturi corporis maiores suscipit mollitia doloribus libero nam. Ut animi aut ad accusantium excepturi et.

Laborum non aspernatur iure iusto et praesentium earum voluptas. Est est dolorem amet quo doloremque. Qui officiis sed officia modi et excepturi consequuntur. Occaecati eaque sit officia fugiat voluptates.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (50) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”