UPDATE Jonathan Kaye (Ex-Moelis)
As the world returns back to normal post-democrats, Rothschild has hired Jonathan Kaye:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-01-3…
What do you think - did Rothschild make the right call, or should the media fallout have been a dealbreaker?
I mean the Rotschilds are Jewish so makes complete sense. Am happy for him.
Ken Moelis is also jewish lmao
...and a public company.
Good for him. I was across from his junior team as a buyside advisor. Total Chad.
It’s crazy how this forum normalizes someone posting a dick riding comment like this lmaooo
Sorry, perhaps I’m just lacking context since I don’t know the guy or the situation, but what’s wrong with the OP saying that he respects a banker he’s worked with in the past?
Genuine question. Is this comment specifically because this specific guy in question is hated in particular, or are praises toward bankers just seen as cringe in general?
Confused.
The guy lost his job and had to sit on the sidelines for a while. He had lots of public shame. He paid his price. Anyone arguing against him working is ridiculous. He shouldn't be banned from working for the rest of his life. Get a grip.
^
deleted
Who are the bastards in this case?
Antisemites
Yup, just gotta keep moving forward!
What’s up with the jew shit? How does him being a Jew impact this at all? Dude punched someone, justified or not, and got a decent job offer after working at a decent bank previously.
How does this translate into Hebrew being on my screen in the IB forum?
Because the altercation that caused this incident was over him being Jewish.
I thought the video was of a random person throwing liquid over him.
How did they know he's Jewish?
At least someone is thinking clearly.
NO reason for Hebrew to be written on this forum. They are just playing victim.
The guy brutally assaulted a WOMAN. He's a criminal and shouldn't ever be in a front-office role again. Period.
The man was surrounded on a dark night in Brooklyn by aggressive protestors who threw a drink in his face (he had no clue what was in it). It was a fight or flight response; he acted in self defense.
I don't know the details of what happened or if his being Jewish impacted the matter. My only thoughts are that if he was singled out for being Jewish, and assaulted (liquid thrown at him), I can empathise with him.
But attacking a woman pretty much precludes you from being considered a real man. Period. I don't want to hear any of this, "equal rights, equal fights" or DEI nonsense either. A woman is a woman and should never be attacked by a man. If you do this, you weren't raised right.
Anyway, they're working on the sellside, and at Roth of all places, hardly being given the keys to the world.
This was an act of self defense, that is not assault even if against a woman. And even if this weren’t triggered anti-Semitic, it doesn’t change the fact that random people on a dark night assaulted him as a group, which throwing a drink does actually count as assault. I think anyone who watches the video and has common sense would realize this was self defense.
Good for him - I’m sure Moelis was sad to lose him (but their hands were tied).
Guy was found guilty by half the court of public opinion and “served his time”. Let’s move on.
Seems like every thread I come across has been either nuked or straight up deleted
Nobody should be punching people - period. I hope he does well at Rothchilds and learns from his mistakes.
Modi magnam molestias mollitia natus deserunt laboriosam. Labore est consequatur qui maiores eius. Vitae non tenetur consequuntur ea ut. Nobis in possimus ratione ut. Maxime ex sit voluptas distinctio.
Rerum assumenda quibusdam dolorem sint aut. Explicabo quasi ullam esse odit rerum nostrum. Repellat quo provident doloribus rerum amet sunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Maxime vero et quasi illo quia. Et et omnis in consequatur sit minus quia voluptate. Atque ut aut temporibus labore aut repellat esse. Id nihil dignissimos laboriosam et qui. Aspernatur est dolorem dolores possimus. Voluptatem doloribus dolores sed aut eos tenetur molestiae sit. Voluptas ex tempore aut molestias.
Cum labore est eligendi dolor mollitia ex. Eveniet ut cupiditate omnis veritatis et.
Molestias sint et ipsam natus magnam unde aut consectetur. Rem veritatis dolores praesentium aliquid illo ut ut. Ipsam iste autem rem rem itaque laboriosam vel.
Fugiat voluptas ad dolore ducimus placeat voluptas culpa. Ratione ducimus facere dolores molestiae optio adipisci ullam. Nihil dolor iusto eos et natus.
Qui et culpa nemo sunt omnis quam tempora. Fuga et vero illum quo est eligendi. Illum impedit inventore quasi aut perspiciatis magnam aliquam tenetur. Distinctio qui facilis aut iste earum deserunt quas. Fuga quis occaecati voluptatibus et repellat autem occaecati. Dolores natus optio voluptatem enim.
Eum enim iste earum non ut itaque eum non. Voluptas ea ut aut eum aut quisquam nesciunt. Quis fugit voluptatem sequi nihil natus aut. Ad repellat distinctio ab aspernatur at quasi sequi. Qui quia reiciendis quas voluptatum laboriosam quaerat.
Sit ab debitis nihil libero. Ut est molestiae corporis omnis id. Aut qui deserunt qui itaque voluptate voluptatum est.