US Gaap - EU comps

Hi everyone,

Given the difference between the two accounting methodology we have usually different EBITDA for US vs. EU companies (post IFRS 16). When spreading the comps I do understand how to adjust historical years but how do you do that for the projections? Assuming that from what I see so far they are all pre IFRS 16 for us companies.

In summary how do you adjust EBITDA projections in a comp file to make US companies comparable to EU companie (post IFRS 16)

Many thanks guysss

7 Comments
 
Most Helpful

If I’m not mistaken, IFRS 16 essentially changed the treatment of operating leases. Post IFRS all leases are treated as finance leases which has a few consequences for European companies.

Thinking about it conceptually, Post IFRS 16 EBITDA would be the same as GAAP EBITDAR, since GAAP EBITDAR adds back the operating lease expense (aka cash rent payments)

The simplest way to make them comparable is to add back the lease liability to EV value of IFRS company and pairing EV + Lease Liability (this includes both operating and finance leases as there’s no distinction under IFRS) with Post IFRS 16 EBITDA

For companies using GAAP you’d need to add back cash rent expense (operating lease expense) to EBITDA in order to get EBITDAR. You also include the operating lease liability (and it also makes sense to include the finance lease liability) to EV here. So your multiples should look something like this:

IFRS:

(EV + Lease Liability) / Post IFRS 16 EBITDA

GAAP:

(EV + Finance and Operating Lease Liabilities) / (EBITDA + Operating Lease Expense or cash rent payments)

I think this is the most elegant way to make them comprable based on uniform reporting standards. Albeit some companies choose to disclose more information than they are required to.

 

Understood how you would do that for historical numbers. But how can you do it for forecasts? Especially given most of the broker notes are pre IFRS 16 for US companies? Is looking at the leases commitment for future years a good proxy as adjustment?

 

Same way you would project any other number and there’s no straight answer. (i) it depends on the business and the nature of the leases, (ii) historical operating lease payments are good proxy. You can simply apply a growth rate and assume the company will continue leasing similar assets / equipment and make a number of assumptions (management can help with that)

Note that an increase increase in operating (cash rent) payments would also require you adjust debt. Brokers usually capitalize it at 8x rent payments and call it a day.

For example if the lease payments are $100, the increase in EV would be $100 x 8. If you assume that cash payments will increase to $200 next year for whatever reason, you need to readjust EV (again, $200 x 8 or any other cap rate assumption you want to make)

 

Won’t cover the op. lease / IFRS-16 point as it’s covered already.

On R&D capitalization for SaaS businesses for instance, under IFRS you are allowed to capitalize (e.g. book it as intangibles capex and then amortize over time), whereas generally under GAAP you would just expense.

Thus implications are that assuming all else equals post IFRS EBITDA (assuming they do capitalize R&D) will be greater than US GAAP EBITDAR, due to you taking the “entire hit” of R&D cost in your SG&A for the latter case.

One way to adjust is to do post IFRS EBITDA - capitalized R&D that way it would be comparable

 

Voluptas velit mollitia hic est. Quia voluptatem provident aut natus iste nemo vel et. Id quos atque et sunt qui voluptatibus. Beatae voluptates non aut natus tempora sint.

Vero veritatis iusto quo rerum tenetur laborum aut quo. Qui doloribus rerum quas quos ut voluptas laborum. Dolores possimus ea voluptate quia aperiam nobis quam rerum. Quidem aut amet ex rem consequatur et dolores.

Mollitia harum debitis animi doloremque dolor amet. Nam nisi et hic quis. Laborum rem vel repellat blanditiis maiores est et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”