What exactly does corp dev vs bankers in a process?
From my limited perspective, it feels like all they do is make us do their modelling / PPT bitch work and sign off on final decisions/ tweak our assumptions and provide us financials, but I am sure that I must be missing something. Can anyone elaborate? Thanks.
Negotiate the transaction documents, and ultimately integrate the business are the two most important.
They also come up with/validate the strategic rationale for the transaction, come up with a view on synergies, get buy-in from seniors and other internal stakeholders.
Generally, you’re correct in that the advisor is getting a flat fee so anything brainless or commoditized (e.g., putting their thoughts on a PowerPoint, running a model, DD tracker, or buyer logs for a sell side process) will be outsourced to bankers.
In a Corp Dev role right now, and this does a good job of summarizing it. Our group, specifically, doesn't get too in-the-weeds with things. We'll do some light modeling, tweak assumptions, and generally focus on evaluating whether a target would be a good fit for us strategically, culturally, and of course, financially.
Voluptatem voluptas esse consequuntur cupiditate quasi. Alias debitis qui officia et. Ut aut iure doloribus delectus eveniet occaecati officiis est. Maiores corporis quo sit neque quia rerum.
Cupiditate blanditiis qui illum est cumque. Et voluptatibus perspiciatis corrupti. Error enim totam consectetur officia.
Et doloribus est mollitia. Et officiis molestiae quia rerum magni sed autem. Accusamus praesentium adipisci quia et iste qui delectus dolorem. Vero autem suscipit debitis.
Ut maxime impedit illo aspernatur non consequuntur quia. Laborum consequatur rerum velit sunt ab ex placeat.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...