What is generally the best group to be in?

What is the most interesting or most challenging in your opinion? Which would you choose, if you had to stay in banking long-term and why would you choose that specific group?

Not taking into account prestige/exits and company. Just the content/work.

HC? CG? TMT? FIG? M&A?

7 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, the "best" group to be in depends heavily on your personal interests and long-term goals. Here's a breakdown of the groups you mentioned, focusing on the content and work rather than prestige or exits:

  1. M&A (Mergers & Acquisitions):

    • Why it's interesting/challenging: M&A is highly technical and offers exposure to a variety of industries. You'll develop strong financial modeling and valuation skills, which are transferable across many roles. The work can be repetitive, but it provides a deep understanding of deal mechanics and strategy.
    • Long-term fit: If you enjoy the technical side of banking and want to build a versatile skill set, M&A is a strong choice. However, it can be intense and demanding, often described as a "sweatshop" environment.
  2. TMT (Technology, Media, and Telecom):

    • Why it's interesting/challenging: TMT is dynamic and fast-paced, with exposure to innovative industries and companies. The work often involves understanding cutting-edge technologies and trends, which can be intellectually stimulating.
    • Long-term fit: If you're passionate about tech and innovation, TMT can be a great fit. It also aligns well with potential exits to startups or venture capital, should you ever decide to pivot.
  3. FIG (Financial Institutions Group):

    • Why it's interesting/challenging: FIG deals with banks, insurance companies, and other financial institutions. The work can be niche and involves understanding complex regulatory environments and financial structures.
    • Long-term fit: FIG is ideal if you enjoy diving into the weeds of financial systems and regulations. It’s a solid choice for those who want to specialize in a specific, technical area of finance.
  4. Healthcare (HC):

    • Why it's interesting/challenging: Healthcare is a resilient and ever-evolving industry. The work often involves understanding biotech, pharmaceuticals, and healthcare services, which can be both technical and rewarding.
    • Long-term fit: If you have an interest in science or healthcare, this group offers a unique blend of finance and industry-specific knowledge. It’s also a stable sector, given its essential nature.
  5. Consumer Goods (CG):

    • Why it's interesting/challenging: CG focuses on companies that produce goods for consumers. The work often involves understanding market trends, branding, and consumer behavior.
    • Long-term fit: If you’re interested in marketing, retail, or consumer trends, CG can be a good fit. However, it may not be as technical as other groups like M&A or FIG.

Which would I choose for long-term banking?

If the goal is to stay in banking long-term, TMT or Healthcare might be the most fulfilling choices. Both sectors are dynamic, offer intellectual stimulation, and are less likely to become monotonous over time. TMT is ideal for those who love innovation and tech, while Healthcare suits those with an interest in science and a desire to work in a stable, impactful industry.

Sources: Post MBA IB: deciding which group?, What are the best groups for JPM?, Best Investment Banks, TMT vs. FIG vs. Industrials BB Group Move, 20 Most Frequently Asked Questions - London Edition

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

You don’t wanna climb a mountain and be close to reaching the summit to only realize that you climbed the wrong one. Right now, while it’s fine to get opinions from other people, be aware that you are susceptible to other people dictating your perception of what’s “interesting” or “challenging”. And I mean this to not be brash but to let you know of that blind spot. 

But my 2cents is to do your own research on the various coverage groups/product groups, reflect on them, and see which one you seem to gravitate towards naturally. 

 

There are two main questions you need to ask yourself when picking a group

1. Which sort of companies do I want to spend the next 2-20+ years learning and thinking about. For me I wasn't enthusiastic about spending 80 hours per week reading about Industrials/ Mining companies, nor was I particularly interested by fashion/ make-up brands, therefore Consumer would be a bad fit even though both are strong teams at my bank

2. Is my bank good in XYZ team? You may want to go into Consumer, but if your bank is only bringing in mandates in TMT and Fintech, and the Consumer team just pitches all the time (=low bonus also) then you should consider applying for the TMT/Fintech team.

 
Most Helpful

Thought we might use this thread to give a bit of a developed perspective on different sectors, note my experience is limited.

Did an SA in a mining group cause I thought I'd like the macro aspect and the actual companies just looked more interesting to me (geographies, the type of problems they face/prepare for, commodity markets, complex logistics/supply chains around some projects). Those aspects did exist but I also realised I would simply never really touch on them to any depth as a junior. Some pros and cons of mining specifically:
 

Pros: 

1) Travel: there is a bit of business travel and it tends to be to much more interesting locations than for other sectors (note this depends on taste, I quite enjoy spending time in some of the geographies where you find mining projects)

2) Modelling: extremely large and complex models (relative to the banking average I mean, realistically nothing of anything done in this industry is rocket science), which can be a bit more interesting than some of the other bitch work. Con being that as a result of complexity you're not usually left to actually contribute too much to the model until you have some experience (in my team only assocs and up did the models, and VPs were very hands on)

3) People are less bullshit, this isn't really a tech finger in the air valuation where you have to constantly pitch a dream. The business attracts more "grounded" ppl in my eyes, and whilst not everyone was fun (very few ac but I think that was just my team), I didn't see the cliché of the showy banker selling his wares all over. 

4) I'll say it again, the actual businesses are just cool. They have a very clear physical presence and operate on a scale that can be impressive. Their impact is visible around the world, fully understanding the different steps in the supply chain is somewhat fun, and I enjoyed the fact policy is likely to play an increasing role 

5) not a pro or a con but just for info the vast majority of my team's flow was M&A, though it appears there's also quite a bit of debt raise going around the sector as well

Cons:

  1. BENCHMARKING. If you do mining as a junior, welcome to the fun of our most common task, benchmarking. Benchmarking production, benchmarking, financial ratios, benchmarking valuations (I remember going through so f. many broker reports looking for that one NAV line). There is a lot of that going around.
  2. Seniority: By virtue of the modelling being complex and the sector having so many specific dynamics (ex: political risks), I saw a little bit of a tendency to leave the actual business analysis to VPs or up. This means that your experience there can be a little frustrating/shallow, you might get a shot at more valuable analysis early on in other teams
  3. I don't actually consider this a con but in the spirit of full info, there is very little sponsor activity. PE funds that invest in mining are very very rare. Really. But, SWFs are showing a significant increase in interest, in particular MENA ones that, amongst other things, may see a potential hedge for their oil revenues in a copper mine.
 

Voluptates ea repudiandae quia velit. Non ad dolorum ea et. Doloremque veritatis facilis aliquam debitis. Laboriosam hic voluptatum aut quia voluptatem ea. Nisi autem corporis amet hic.

Earum labore omnis molestiae porro. Est labore laudantium cum eum. Vero laudantium laborum inventore earum. Vel maxime hic sunt ex. Corrupti omnis consectetur id eaque necessitatibus consequatur. Ullam incidunt dolores blanditiis dolor. Nostrum harum voluptas qui aliquam atque.

Doloremque facere natus ut eum ex. Voluptas impedit natus in et dolores possimus.

Similique recusandae aut aut est quis sed. Et est adipisci possimus ea. Consectetur soluta corporis et ipsa quia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”