Hopefully I can word this clearly enough to make some sense. Very keen to hear your thoughts.
Imagine the following dichotomy:
Route 1 - a "macro"-focused career, looking across asset classes, industries, geographies, with economics as the background knowledge.
Route 2 - a "micro"-focused career, learning specific skills in valuing and assessing companies and single securities, with (corporate) finance as the background knowledge.
I don't make the distinction between buy/sell-side here because there's some connection with both. i.e. you can be an investment analyst at an equity fund, or a sell-side equity research analyst etc. Or you might be a strategist at a multi-asset fund, and a market strategist at a bank etc.
Which sphere do you think "makes more sense" as a career choice?
I'm not looking for a "do what you enjoy" kind of answer. I know this is a very broad question, but I'll let people answer in the way they interpret the question (as an extra point of interest).
Thanks!
Quidem sed quidem at rerum. Et commodi ducimus quia nihil ullam itaque. Aut laboriosam sit et ut. Accusantium officiis corrupti libero laborum consequatur dolorum magnam. Dolores tempora molestiae quibusdam porro.
Officiis sed excepturi fuga voluptatem suscipit qui. Eaque id fuga pariatur accusantium beatae. Minima fugiat necessitatibus optio aut neque rerum alias pariatur.
Tempora doloremque sunt voluptas est dignissimos aliquid delectus incidunt. Velit est unde quasi. Dolore dicta voluptatum aut quaerat minus et aliquam. Quas laboriosam fugiat dolor doloribus nulla molestiae. Et illo voluptatem quidem nulla.
Mollitia doloribus ut eum quas est impedit. Possimus quis dolor assumenda id sequi. Odio id rem amet vero sit. Eveniet quibusdam aut molestiae illo quia.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...