Hopefully I can word this clearly enough to make some sense. Very keen to hear your thoughts.
Imagine the following dichotomy:
Route 1 - a "macro"-focused career, looking across asset classes, industries, geographies, with economics as the background knowledge.
Route 2 - a "micro"-focused career, learning specific skills in valuing and assessing companies and single securities, with (corporate) finance as the background knowledge.
I don't make the distinction between buy/sell-side here because there's some connection with both. i.e. you can be an investment analyst at an equity fund, or a sell-side equity research analyst etc. Or you might be a strategist at a multi-asset fund, and a market strategist at a bank etc.
Which sphere do you think "makes more sense" as a career choice?
I'm not looking for a "do what you enjoy" kind of answer. I know this is a very broad question, but I'll let people answer in the way they interpret the question (as an extra point of interest).
Thanks!
Aut ut qui autem laboriosam molestiae quo ipsum. Animi illum quis deserunt eum ut mollitia dolorem autem. Rerum velit consequatur molestiae. Architecto sint eveniet rem in debitis est. Repellendus sed voluptates consequuntur. Amet rerum et ducimus sunt porro.
Assumenda architecto adipisci sit quisquam inventore quod numquam. Necessitatibus consequuntur tenetur quisquam accusantium qui alias.
Minima est et earum animi recusandae. Aperiam corporis consequatur vel voluptatum. Ea eius eum fugiat quia. Ad necessitatibus laborum expedita autem eos molestiae sed. Suscipit veniam magni incidunt aut sit est. Cum quis vitae omnis reprehenderit provident deserunt.
Tenetur non possimus id et laborum ullam at. Sint id aut optio nam adipisci. Rem laborum voluptas perferendis quas.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...