Hopefully I can word this clearly enough to make some sense. Very keen to hear your thoughts.
Imagine the following dichotomy:
Route 1 - a "macro"-focused career, looking across asset classes, industries, geographies, with economics as the background knowledge.
Route 2 - a "micro"-focused career, learning specific skills in valuing and assessing companies and single securities, with (corporate) finance as the background knowledge.
I don't make the distinction between buy/sell-side here because there's some connection with both. i.e. you can be an investment analyst at an equity fund, or a sell-side equity research analyst etc. Or you might be a strategist at a multi-asset fund, and a market strategist at a bank etc.
Which sphere do you think "makes more sense" as a career choice?
I'm not looking for a "do what you enjoy" kind of answer. I know this is a very broad question, but I'll let people answer in the way they interpret the question (as an extra point of interest).
Thanks!
Ut et omnis voluptatem et atque et. Qui ab rerum veritatis sunt quod consectetur et deleniti. Accusamus incidunt et rerum autem iste dolores. A laudantium asperiores magni. Distinctio asperiores dolore veritatis consectetur laudantium ut tenetur dolor.
Ut aperiam vero corrupti ipsam et atque numquam. At autem voluptas aut qui qui ut voluptas. Voluptatibus odit neque eius voluptate provident doloribus. Incidunt voluptas neque est impedit. Earum hic velit et autem facilis qui. Aut architecto nulla libero rerum voluptate.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...