I just took a online test for a BB. The numerical one was fine, the usual. Then I had to take this logical aptitude test which was basically identifying patterns in drawn lines, and geometry figures. I don't think i did well on it. But I don't see how that crap has anything to do with logic. I would expect some kind of critical reasoning based test for logic.
| +970 | Bank of America - Juniors Strike to start Monday May 6th | 126 | 32m | |
| +557 | BOFA ALREADY TRYING TO COVER UP THEIR TRACKS | 72 | 3h | |
| +324 | This is a dark day for Wall Street. | 33 | 2h | |
| +154 | Investment Banking US League Table YTD 2024 (FactSet) | 85 | 9h | |
| +147 | Big Layoff at Barclays - 5/1/24 | 85 | 13h | |
| +90 | “Americans just work harder” | 54 | 5h | |
| +83 | Would comitting to ATL İB be stupid? Please give feedback. | 45 | 3d | |
| +69 | Sleeping on Jefferies??? | 35 | 6h | |
| +60 | What's up with RBC nowadays? | 28 | 2h | |
| +58 | BofA List | 7 | 5h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
If you don't see how that crap has anything to do with logic, it is because you dont have enough of it.
...
POOOSSSSAYYYY
suck it up, stop moaning and tuck in.
fair enough
that's WAY easier than numerical IMO. You can be really sure about each answer.
but yeah, I don't see the point of online tests either.
Damn, I'd love that in a recruitment process. I always kill pattern identification tests.
This definitely has to be UBS...
Dolor nesciunt impedit molestiae debitis temporibus vero repellendus qui. Eos libero dolor aliquid quia excepturi beatae. Nesciunt possimus et sapiente non. Qui molestiae in incidunt molestiae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...