When would a company choose a rights offering instead of other alternative?
Wikipedia says: "Because rights offerings are unpopular, companies typically choose them as a last resort, perhaps due to insufficient investor demand."
Why are rights offering unpopular? Is it because a company would rather prefer to do a placement towards its larger shareholders instead of including all the small shareholders as well? What would be other options available to a rights offering for a company? Placements and follow-ons?
ECM banker here - In my experience, rights offerings are generally used by low market cap companies, typically small pre-revenue HC, to raise more money through the equity market than they could with a straight common stock offering. Without a rights offering, it is very difficult for these companies to raise significant capital. Through rights offerings, I have seen companies raise more money than their pre-deal market cap.
.
Thanks. But why is it easier for these companies to raise money in a rights offering compared with a follow-on, a placement, etc? Is it because rights offering is usually priced at a much larger discount and hence more attractive to investors?
Maiores adipisci non recusandae maxime repellat velit et deserunt. Repellendus odio quibusdam debitis quia quam. Porro suscipit quia libero libero temporibus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...