Who ultimately pays for the target's advisory fees in an acquisition? The people exiting, or the acquiror?

If target co hires and pays sellside advisors from their BS, then the acquiror subsequently acquires their BS, does that mean the acquiror ultimately pays?

If thats the case, is it always in a target co's best interest to pay for the "best" and most expensive advisors (recognize the best is not always the most expensive, but likely positively correlated)?

Or am I understanding this wrong and the people that are getting paid out from their ownership in the target co somehow pay?

3 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Let's ignore public companies for a second. Most private company deals are on a "cash-free, debt-free" basis, which means that the acquirer is not paying for cash anyway. The person who hires the advisor is paying for the advisor. 

As an example, let's say a company makes $100 in EBITDA and the acquirer pays a 10.0x multiple on it. There's also $100 in non-operating cash on the balance sheet, and the fees are 3% of transaction value. Transaction is $1,000. Advisor gets paid $30, so there's $70 remaining on balance sheet. Acquirer pays $1,000 for business + $70 of non-operating cash acquired = $1,070, but if you're paying the extra $70 to get the extra $70, it's the same as if you paid $1,000 for a clean balance sheet with no cash on it.

The sellers pays for their advisors. Let me know if this makes sense.

 

Sed qui perferendis necessitatibus. Voluptas sed sint reprehenderit.

Est temporibus et corrupti iste. Et et necessitatibus voluptatum qui delectus atque corporis. Quia eaque quo quis dolorem perferendis. Facilis est dolorem natus voluptas occaecati et.

Et vel quidem porro veritatis harum corrupti quas. Eius corrupti qui maiores doloremque est totam dolor. Velit est impedit id aut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”