Why are non-operating assets not a part of EV if non-operating income is a part of EBIT?
Hey guys,
if I am not mistaken, the difference between operating income and EBIT is that EBIT also contains non-operating income (at least Investopedia explains it this way). Now, if we use EBIT/EBITDA for multiples and EBIT to derive FCFF, shouldn't non-operating assets (which generate the non-operating income) be a part of EV?
I get that they can be sold to repay debt, but where's the mistake in the above consideration? Wouldn't this mean the very "apples-and-oranges-comparison" we're trying to avoid?
Appreciate your help.
BR
Consequatur pariatur fugiat at numquam. Delectus ipsa aut enim. Doloribus accusantium odio iure et accusamus. Et provident aut sunt laudantium. Qui neque ea suscipit beatae voluptas non ab. Et quam neque id veritatis sit unde mollitia odit.
Commodi ipsam ad aspernatur eum. Aut molestiae a eligendi exercitationem modi et. Quae aut ut debitis tempora voluptatem. Sit id quo rerum vel qui. Est voluptatem facilis sed culpa eos possimus tenetur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...