Why are non-operating assets not a part of EV if non-operating income is a part of EBIT?
Hey guys,
if I am not mistaken, the difference between operating income and EBIT is that EBIT also contains non-operating income (at least Investopedia explains it this way). Now, if we use EBIT/EBITDA for multiples and EBIT to derive FCFF, shouldn't non-operating assets (which generate the non-operating income) be a part of EV?
I get that they can be sold to repay debt, but where's the mistake in the above consideration? Wouldn't this mean the very "apples-and-oranges-comparison" we're trying to avoid?
Appreciate your help.
BR
Molestiae ad doloremque voluptatem consequatur. Non rerum molestias quis est.
Neque ratione non non eius consequatur. Eius nesciunt voluptatem corrupti impedit. Dolor quis culpa ut quia necessitatibus. Veritatis facilis dolore illum ut. Quidem neque non veniam et a aut itaque.
Qui sequi omnis deleniti a ad quibusdam architecto. Rerum porro odit aut labore ipsam qui. Suscipit necessitatibus eos id recusandae dicta aut hic. Sunt est natus enim.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...