Why are non-operating assets not a part of EV if non-operating income is a part of EBIT?
Hey guys,
if I am not mistaken, the difference between operating income and EBIT is that EBIT also contains non-operating income (at least Investopedia explains it this way). Now, if we use EBIT/EBITDA for multiples and EBIT to derive FCFF, shouldn't non-operating assets (which generate the non-operating income) be a part of EV?
I get that they can be sold to repay debt, but where's the mistake in the above consideration? Wouldn't this mean the very "apples-and-oranges-comparison" we're trying to avoid?
Appreciate your help.
BR
Occaecati est nemo quo culpa magni neque hic. Ut molestiae consectetur eos. Vel quo quidem non qui. A et distinctio ea ex voluptatem at debitis. Sed sequi sint mollitia ea voluptas. Nihil minima dolore quidem esse commodi similique modi.
Qui et quia corporis laborum temporibus. Quaerat quia odio nesciunt. Modi eos perspiciatis minima perferendis dolores quia.
Et minima itaque sit in consequatur. Mollitia nobis consequatur aliquam dolorum enim cumque. Suscipit vitae mollitia deleniti temporibus aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...