60 Comments
 
Most Helpful

MOE might be a tier above JEFF, but at this point, I’m wondering what makes GUGG and PWP “elite.”

In terms of large transactions, JEFF has done more $1 billion+ deals than PWP and GUGG combined. Its coverage has also expanded well beyond its traditional strengths.

JEFF’s Houston Energy and Healthcare groups alone bring in more revenue than PWP as a whole.

Just look at the league tables and fee share in LSEG Americas. JEFF is #6, while GUGG is behind even HL. I couldn’t find PWP in top 20

 
Controversial

First Congrats on JEF, this is too obvious lol.

JEF is a volume shop, take bunch of deals instead of quality deals. Plus GUGG and PWP have a way stronger RX franchise. Period.

Take out SMBC then JEF is nothing. Hope they get acquired soon!

 

Not the person who posted the league table above, and I haven’t worked at JEF, but I think he made a solid point.

I worked at a lower-tier EB (GUGG/ROTH/PWP), and we were constantly pitching against shops like JEF/WF/WB/HL. We also did plenty of $300 million deals

The only difference is exits. My group sent two second-year analysts to Bain Capital / Carlyle; not sure if JEFF has the same exits. 

 

Analyst 1 in IB - Gen

First Congrats on JEF, this is too obvious lol.

JEF is a volume shop, take bunch of deals instead of quality deals. Plus GUGG and PWP have a way stronger RX franchise. Period.

Take out SMBC then JEF is nothing. Hope they get acquired soon!

RX is only one of JEF’s product groups, and most of the firm’s revenue comes from coverage-driven M&A. JEF also has another product group (PCA) that is significantly stronger than the PCA platforms at PWP and GUGG, no?

“JEF is a volume shop that takes on a bunch of deals instead of quality deals.” How exactly are you defining “quality”? JEF literally closed more $1B+ transactions this quarter than the two firms you mentioned combined. In terms of client quality, JEF also advises a couple of top-tier sponsors and strategics this year.

“Take out SMBC and JEF is nothing. Hope they get acquired soon!” That is like saying MS would be nothing without MUFG. If anything, isn’t PWP far more likely to be acquired than JEF?

 

What you mean Moelis “might be” above JEF. They are 😂. Least obvious JEF banker

 
Funniest

Congrats on GUGG. Prolly just a junior student who is trying to convince people that GUGG is on par with PWP/MOE and use Jefferies as a scapegoat

 

Honestly, none of these four shops get any institutional respect, individual bankers get respect but there is no brand value from a client perspective at any of them. They are all the same to me although I will say the quality of management at MOE and GG > JEF > PWP (exacerbated by the recent failed deal)

If you’re thinking of lateraling it 100% comes down to which bankers you are working for,

Note: nothing wrong with this, once a banker is good enough to be their own brand, the institution they work for is irrelevant. 

 

Don't know why you got MS thrown at you, you're 100% right. The banks serve as the platform, the MDs and Directors are the business. Sales 101.

 

It’s really for two distinct reasons:


1) Jeffries has a reputation for threatening to bar you from their future processes if you don’t hire them and if you’re a sponsor looking to deploy capital, you can’t risk that (they have good deal flow)

2) as much as people are aware of the phenomenon of them over promising during bake-offs, everyone always has an inflated view of what their own assets are worth and loves hearing that they are special (finance people love their ego stroked don’t forget)


all that said, they can run a good sellside process but often times it doesn’t get done at the value they promised…

 

Literally equivalent to your parents buying you a Ferrari and you using it to deliver DoorDash. 

 

 

Recruiting: GS > MS > JEFF

Real Work (depend on groups obviously), but JEFF just ran so many processes and they do very standard sell-sides (less bilateral discussions), so their analyst experience is arguably the best + their sweatshop name

 

Just because something is a meatgrinder doesn’t mean surviving it has inherent value or is something to be proud of.

I did time in group/bank the dumbasses on this site jerk off to for “prestige.” It was a waste of 2+ years of my life.

If you spent years in a Vietnamese POW camp with a cattle prod up your ass, yeah you build resilience and some other skills but you’re almost certainly worse off than if you never got subjected to that.

Whereas the Jefferies guys would walk around like they’re hot shit for surviving it, brag about taking more cattle prods than the other camps, and then wherever they go next try to jam cattle prods up everyone else’s ass.

 

I’m surely there’s some people at Jefferies who are lovely people (maybe, I haven’t met any but I’m saying this to be nice) but the current and former Jefferies bankers I’ve interacted with exude a weird form of incel-adjacent/small dick energy.  Like insulting me in an interview for no reason. Or getting into weird dick measuring contests or just unprompted toxicity out of nowhere. Something is clearly very wrong there , like some sort of mass psychosis. 

 

100%, this is a huge generalization but Jeff is a lot of IVY grads that were not good enough for BB/EB and try to make up for it by being dicks

 

The “Ivy” League MBA asos take this to an extreme. Like sure buddy you’re totally  smart because you paid $100k+ a year in your early 30s at a program with a 30% acceptance rate just lol

 

One important reason is that JEFF is very non-target friendly, with plenty of analysts from competitive tier-2 schools (IU, BYU, and SMU) as well as schools less known for finance recruiting (Rochester, Lehigh, and Kenyon)

Breaking in from those backgrounds takes confidence and a bit of ego, so it’s natural for them to take pride in what they’ve achieved

 

That’s exactly why JEFF is shit. Have you ever seen PWP taken any kids from shitty schools like BYU/SMU? All some wanna-be republican trash

 

Lol all you JEF haters get so emotional I swear the company lives in your head rent free. You love to exclaim it’s hell on earth and not really base on anything except old stereotypes from like 15 years ago.

I don’t work at JEF. Idgaf before you all say “congrats on JEF!”.

It’s probably not as bad or as good as the extremes are posting about on here.

But the fact that the top comment above is backing up a claim about JEF outperforming with DATA and FACTS and the JEF haters reply is basically “nuh huh nuh huh no that doesn’t fit my narrative of prestige!” is hilarious to me

 

I interned there last summer and actually had a more positive experience than my friends at other banks. It does seem extremely group dependent though. I'm sure all banks are to an extent but because Jefferies grew a lot in the last 5-10 years so the groups are independent fiefdoms that reflect the senior leadership. Group I was working with most of the time was great, actually the opposite of what people here describe. I will say though, people who had been at the firm before the past ~7 year expansion told me the stereotypes used to be accurate. Used to be very sharp elbowed, super old school, no support, etc. But now it's probably a more typical experiece.

Think some of the confidence (or arrogance) comes from it being a unique structure. Post-GFC it's the only scaled full service independent investment bank. So you can tell yourself "we're not like GS/MS/JPM, we're independent." And you can also tell yourself "we're not like Evercore, we're full service." That + growth and success is how you end up with the "league of our own" mentality imo. 

It was just one summer but felt like I got the vibe by working across multiple groups (generalist internship), but definitely did not think this place was some unique torture chamber. I guess the one of a kind structure, growth, and maybe some people with chips on their shoulder can lead to the mentality people discussed, but I didn't really encounter that. 

I actually liked that the bank has a unique identity versus a BofA or Citi type place thats some massive multinational institution with for four million divisions and no edge. Even a random EB other than top two or so, I don't really understand what their unique identity is. For better or worse Jefferies has one and I enjoyed working for a place that was at least different.

 

It really depends on groups. Know people from industry groups and they seem pretty chill. While people in groups like PC or RX are pretty weird

 

I think a lot of this comes down to how people view their own platform and the deals they’ve worked on. JEF has a strong presence in certain areas, so I can see why some bankers feel confident comparing themselves with other firms. But saying you’re automatically better than GUG, PWP, or Moelis is a different story. Team quality, deal flow, and the group you join can matter more than the name on the building. I’d be more interested in what the specific group is doing than the claims people make during recruiting.

 

Aliquam voluptatem eligendi dolor quidem. Iste ut autem et voluptate porro. Aut facere quae ab et amet. Laboriosam minima tenetur distinctio ex quidem eos modi sit. Ea iste odit accusantium sed rerum.

Praesentium a molestiae quia numquam autem nobis quibusdam. Iure mollitia autem rerum alias cumque aut enim. Corrupti ut id rerum officiis qui voluptatibus laboriosam. Fuga magni minima est quis a laborum itaque. Qui quasi totam laboriosam et.

 

Eum qui suscipit asperiores facere autem dicta laudantium. Voluptas cumque autem dicta. Et accusantium dolores a quia. Possimus minima magnam sed nostrum voluptatem est velit. Est et natus amet dolorem officia est pariatur. Ut modi eveniet et aliquid libero iusto officia in.

Neque non doloremque blanditiis nihil. Ipsam numquam magni quo dolor dicta. Ut perspiciatis ducimus perspiciatis eius in consectetur. Iusto amet hic perspiciatis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (17) $409
  • Associates (58) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (77) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”