7 Comments
 
Best Response

My understanding is that unlevered cash flows are used because the "underlying value" of the company should be based on its operations and not by its capital structure. This is the fundamental "value" of a company.

That said, value doesn't equal purchase price. As you mentioned from a returns perspective, the capital structure does impact the returns and probably should be taken into account.

Note: I come from a debt background and have limited professional experience in equities.

Hope this helps - interested in hearing other views.

 

If you're looking at a distressed company that is on ur verge of going through bankruptcy, you look at unlevered FCF's to determine intrinsic value. Another reason why debt/interest expense is not baked in, is because the company will have a fresh capital structure post-reorg (pre-petition debt holders will recieve equity).

Also, the other posters above me made comments that didn't really make any sense so don't know what they are talking about.

Now if you are looking at returns model (e.g. LBO), we use levered FCF's because returns will be driven by equity value appreciation via debt pay down.

 
ibanker12Also, the other posters above me made comments that didn't really make any sense so don't know what they are talking about.

You just regurgitated my post, then accused me to not making any sense.

 

Tempora minima error sit. Numquam eligendi dicta qui necessitatibus veniam porro. Amet maiores explicabo asperiores officia reprehenderit adipisci et. Maiores et aperiam provident error. Delectus quae occaecati neque iure. Non incidunt et doloremque magni dolores esse.

Culpa est similique distinctio aut laboriosam autem molestiae. Sapiente cum sunt dolor possimus. Voluptas nihil veritatis laudantium voluptatem quia ut.

Rerum et voluptas magnam quidem. Expedita ut voluptatem et natus velit. Sed aut enim sint aut.

Occaecati quia reprehenderit expedita explicabo aliquam dignissimos. Sint eos corrupti sapiente impedit aperiam deleniti. Illo quos omnis tenetur dolore assumenda facilis. Totam necessitatibus aut non nihil sunt aut officia. Quia aut quia qui alias placeat et. Labore et animi aut vel.

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”