Why do we use debt-free cash flows for DCFs of distressed companies?
Wouldn't we want some debt to reflect normalized levels?
Wouldn't we want some debt to reflect normalized levels?
| +252 | Why UBS Is the Worst Place to Start Your IB Career | 37 | 8h |
| +198 | UBS 2nd Year Analyst Q&A (2026) | 36 | 9h |
| +69 | Firm Thinks I'm Lying About Offer | 20 | 1d |
| +60 | Indiana University Fraternity Pipelines | 36 | 20h |
| +50 | Rogo AI | 20 | 1d |
| +50 | Elite Boutique interview questions | 15 | 7h |
| +45 | Suspended for a Year | 19 | 1d |
| +39 | Stay at Weak Dealflow Team or Lateral? | 12 | 2d |
| +33 | What's your craziest "hardo" story? | 6 | 29m |
| +25 | Wolf of Wall Street vs. Reality: Anyone else feel scammed by the movies? | 8 | 16h |
Career Resources
My understanding is that unlevered cash flows are used because the "underlying value" of the company should be based on its operations and not by its capital structure. This is the fundamental "value" of a company.
That said, value doesn't equal purchase price. As you mentioned from a returns perspective, the capital structure does impact the returns and probably should be taken into account.
Note: I come from a debt background and have limited professional experience in equities.
Hope this helps - interested in hearing other views.
Or maybe its to determine the total debt capacity of the distressed company - assuming that the existing debt will be refinanced upon closing.
If you're looking at a distressed company that is on ur verge of going through bankruptcy, you look at unlevered FCF's to determine intrinsic value. Another reason why debt/interest expense is not baked in, is because the company will have a fresh capital structure post-reorg (pre-petition debt holders will recieve equity).
Also, the other posters above me made comments that didn't really make any sense so don't know what they are talking about.
Now if you are looking at returns model (e.g. LBO), we use levered FCF's because returns will be driven by equity value appreciation via debt pay down.
You just regurgitated my post, then accused me to not making any sense.
great!! thanks for this.
I didn't regurg ur post, buddy. Your explanation wasn't that clear. If it was, I wouldn't have bothered to reply.
Voluptatem laboriosam nesciunt ab ipsam totam ipsa ut alias. Ipsum consequatur incidunt repellendus fugiat autem magnam. Aut necessitatibus cum iste pariatur ratione.
Est ratione nemo illo sapiente at eum fugiat. Voluptate nemo qui explicabo ab saepe pariatur quis. Amet dolore vel et velit soluta est voluptatem.
Eveniet mollitia recusandae ad voluptatem assumenda cumque. Est ab rem esse et.
Praesentium ipsam cum eum quidem qui neque. Molestiae quia amet blanditiis iusto non. Aut mollitia sapiente rerum expedita ut fuga enim. Non delectus saepe totam inventore. Iste magni quisquam sit enim porro ut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...