Why is the Renewables Hiring Market Insane Right Now?

Istg every post I see for a PE role that I get excited about on LinkedIn, I click on it then read the description and it's for renewables developers / infra investors. I thought that was supposed to be small and nichey? I was told Tech is where all the PE exits are at? Da faq

 

I mean the energy sector underlies every basic industry in the world and people are saying it needs to be fully flipped on it's head by 2050. That's an opportunity if I have ever seen one. 

 

Feels risky given the limited upside on Infra returns. Best case scenario you're looking at a pretty modest (even by real asset standards) return. Worst case scenario you buy billions of renewables infrastructure only to realize 20 years from now the future of clean energy isn't in wind turbines and hydro-dams and you've spent billions on something that seemed futuristic in the past but has no place in the present or future. Like going all in on flying car infrastructure back in the 1930s. 

 

Not sure if sarcasm. That's kinda my point. What if, as we're revamping the system in real time, we create more efficient green energy generation systems, methods and infrastructure than what we already have. But it's not like investing in a manufacturer of mobile phones where they simply revamp the product line each year to incorporate the new tech into their new offerings. Way to expensive to do that in renewables you just end up with a decrepit asset like all the vacant 50s-90s vintage office product in NYC.  

 

BankBoy23

Is there some other future of clean energy you're saying? How many years away is that? Couldn't you say there's some better alternative when making any investment? 

100% but Infra isn't a business model where you can easily just update your product line & inventory each year to stay current. You are largely stuck with the asset you purchased, which is where I'd be worried. Conversion plays typically only pencil for the NEXT guy who takes over your decrepit asset at a flashsale / foreclosure price but not for you the seller. 

Short example - 5G infrastructure gets rolled out. Companies like Apple, Samsung, etc. simply make a really small tweak to their software and boom, their phones are now 5G, great. Same with most OEMs. You make new product and secure more inventory every day, not a big deal to update products & inventory going forward. The analogy I would use is more akin to Big Box Department Retail real estate or Office real estate. The problem is if the market changes underneath you, you are stuck with a huge, bulky, expensive non-cash generating asset with no easy way out. Can't simply make one small tweak to your wind farm's software and bring it in line with whatever the new most efficient renewable asset is. 

Yet still, this does apply to other industries. What makes Renewable Infra the most damning to me is that even if all of these risks end up being totally negligible and the bull case scenario comes to fruition, you're looking at what, a 7.0% net levered yield? 

 

Yeah I forgot about that time everyone stopped using electricity and all of the infra guys went under

 

BankBoy23

Is there some other future of clean energy you're saying? How many years away is that? Couldn't you say there's some better alternative when making any investment? 

100% but Infra isn't a business model where you can easily just update your product line & inventory each year to stay current. You are largely stuck with the asset you purchased, which is where I'd be worried. Conversion plays typically only pencil for the NEXT guy who takes over your decrepit asset at a flashsale / foreclosure price but not for you the seller. 

Short example - 5G infrastructure gets rolled out. Companies like Apple, Samsung, etc. simply make a really small tweak to their software and boom, their phones are now 5G, great. Same with most OEMs. You make new product and secure more inventory every day, not a big deal to update products & inventory going forward. The analogy I would use is more akin to Big Box Department Retail real estate or Office real estate. The problem is if the market changes underneath you, you are stuck with a huge, bulky, expensive non-cash generating asset with no easy way out. Can't simply make one small tweak to your wind farm's software and bring it in line with whatever the new most efficient renewable asset is. 

Yet still, this does apply to other industries. What makes Renewable Infra the most damning to me is that even if all of these risks end up being totally negligible and the bull case scenario comes to fruition, you're looking at what, a 7.0% net levered yield? 

I think you have a good point but are also over simplifying the process of transition.

Even if there are new technology down the road, it's gonna take time and resources to reiterate and ramp up , much like how the current renewables play are nowhere near replacing all traditional power plants (including gas-fired ones) in the short to medium term, not in terms of both capacity and reliability.

I think for us , with a 20-40 years career span it will be okay, the bigger issue one should concern on a personal basis is this sector (and traditional infra) is boring as fuck due to some of the points you described (low returns, limited options to switch and strategize over the investment horizon etc.)

 
Funniest

Yes, acquiring operating, fully contracted renewables projects is compared to fixed income thanks to the stable, predictable nature of the cash flows. This is why late stage renewables investors have cheap costs of capital.

I get that you’re pretty green, but you should really pause and think before making sarcastic comments to professionals that know much more than you do. 

 
BankBoy23

What are you talking about dude how is that risky? The whole system is being revamped to combat global warming. Serious opportunity that is essentially guaranteed 

Because what happens, 10 years from now after financing, constructing, and eventually operating, let's say, a massive green hydrogen facility, we figure out cold fusion and renders that entire industry (much less a single project) completely moot and drives NPV to zero / negative value territory.

Thinking "how can renewables be a bad investment? they're the future!" is exactly what OP is talking about - it completely oversimplifies an insanely complex industry and regulatory landscape and completely ignores any-and-all details regarding both execution and future returns. It's just lazy reasoning.

 
Most Helpful

I don't think you know what you're talking about - it sounds like you've seen a few infrastructure models with offtakes or dev fees solved to ridiculously competitive levered returns, and are using this as a proxy to explain why renewables has limited upside in returns.

Taking the development risk to originate projects in attractive markets can result in extremely attractive risk adjusted returns right. The potential optimizations / upsides for tax credit adders outlined in the IRA, the willingness of many corporates and utilities to sign above market offtakes due to their own resource constraints, and the large universe of low cost of capital investors looking to purchase de-risked projects creates boundless opportunity. 

Almost every ISO / RTO in the US is suffering from declining resource adequacy due to increasing load, thermal retirements (economic and policy driven in nature), and backed up interconnection queues. These gaps in supply and reliability are only exasperating by permitting challenges, near term supply chain constraints, over saturated and delayed interconnection queues, etc. These all create significant market opportunity for early movers given the inherent value of their development projects.

You also don't seem to understand that the fundamental value of these projects is not just in the technology - even as they are decommissioned, they still have these EXTREMELEY valuable interconnection rights that are only getting more expensive and logistically difficult due to our own antiquated transmission. The projects are also usually derisked through long term offtakes, so even as the cost curve declines or a superior technology emerges, you are still pretty derisked.; 

Additionally, things like the ability to sell-down tax credits (although not economically efficient) will open up the market to alternative capital structures that aren't limited by available tax liabilities from large investment banks, creating more nimbleness in getting projects financed and operating. 

The above are just a few quick examples of why you're wrong. If you had done more than 20 minutes of research on the subject, you would have captured at least 2 of them; I'd caution you against speaking with authority on a subject you don't understand. 

 

These are the correct answers^^

IRA is an ungodly ‘put your money where your mouth is moment’ in the whole ‘energy transition’. Not sure people appreciate the sheer quantity of incentives IRA put in place.

 

Tons of catalysts like the passage of IRA, support from legislative bodies especially in Europe in the form of TTC and carbon credits, encompassing in the forms of DEI & non financial metrics

 

Enim sequi consectetur qui facilis. Dignissimos voluptas suscipit eveniet omnis perspiciatis. Reprehenderit molestias aut inventore suscipit id doloribus cum sapiente. Dolores minus aperiam laudantium non totam eius quasi. Accusantium nihil harum aut vel adipisci.

 

Molestiae minima non voluptate pariatur hic nobis itaque natus. Quo dolore magni voluptas sed mollitia. Ratione labore amet dolorum neque itaque. Nulla nisi provident ut qui aspernatur explicabo. At veritatis ipsa repellat aut est repellat doloremque.

Eveniet qui qui non aut. Sed rerum ea minus dolorem. Nisi mollitia fugit velit impedit. Amet suscipit est omnis sequi unde. Eum dolore ut animi consequuntur voluptatem. Accusantium et laudantium delectus reiciendis voluptatem nisi laboriosam.

Illum aperiam facilis libero dolor fuga consequatur. Aliquid quis aut rerum autem. Provident minima laborum molestiae impedit facere voluptas assumenda. Non accusamus sint aperiam et quasi cumque officiis. Error sed earum est expedita voluptas quia ea.

Consequatur maiores est aut facere facere. Neque magnam in beatae neque dolor ipsam.

Get busy living

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 25 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”