Worst slides ever?
Have a buddy that laughs everytime he gets a book from Piper Sandler. Very curious to hear what other banks have ridiculous looking decks.
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
Career Resources
bump
I got a Triple Tree deck recently that felt like it was made by interns. Had two typos in the first sentence on the first page.
Who the fuck are Triple Tree?
Basically anything SoftBank churns out
https://www.vice.com/en/article/qvg94x/these-delusional-powerpoint-slid…
Wow. Atrocious
Holy shit this is the worst deck I’ve ever seen
That deck looks worse than any of my middle school presentations.
Was it target?
Surely this is satire?
Agreed. Still worked though, which says something about how important pitch decks really are.
It looks like something that would be distributed to LPs if your LPs were batshit deluded oil rich saudis who don't actually know shit about fuck but like the spectacle of being involved in huge global deals.
Softbank playing chess not checkers. Laugh if you will, but they never run out of money to raise or spend.
not gonna lie this reminds me of the type of sh*t I produced for one of the interviews - I cringe thinking of that though very sweet memory :)
This can't be legit surely.....
That looks like something the gang on Always Sunny would put together to pitch one of their scams
I always thought UBS decks were ugly because of their unfortunate color scheme. Brown, dark red, dark orange, yellow, grey color scheme always looked bad no matter what was on the page.
+1 for SoftBank. The “Valley of the Coronavirus” image on slide 51 of the deck below is legendary.
https://group.softbank/system/files/pdf/ir/presentations/2019/earnings-…
what the fuck?
Holy shit is everyone at SoftBank smoking crack?
their executive coach is Ozzy Osbourne
The entire deck is insane.
wow...this feels like a fake deck they'd put together for a bit on impractical jokers
If bankers had a sense of humor that would be a good punishment, just have the guys present a normal pitch deck
LMAO that looks like some shitty game ad on instagram
It's because they're presenting to batshit crazy Saudi royal LPs and not typical pension / endowment / PE FoF groups based out of the US
Their fundraising speaks for itself
I think it's worth mentioning that we very rarely read the slides.
This was exactly my thought. Literally was thinking how much do I really read the slides that are in any powerpoint (or how much does anyone really?)
I always would talk with colleagues about the usual adage of "I can't wait to put XX hours into a deck that will literally be thrown into the garbage"
I giggled out loud once when someone actually threw a deck I made away in front of me. My boss then told me never to giggle again.
That's not what cajole means.
Lincoln international makes terrible slides
Can you elaborate?
They just look terrible? Not visually pleasing at all. Lots of white space. I’ve seen some of my ex finance professors make better PowerPoints than lincoln’s decks
How they only make slides?
Lincoln International's analysts (generally, with exceptions I'm sure) are not allowed to touch the model, that's associate-and-above responsibilities. As such, analysts and SAs are disproportionately working on these decks, which may explain why you dislike the slides. I haven't seen them first-hand, but this reasoning could explain why.
Not sure where this is coming from. Worked at Lincoln and we have had professional slides developed for every deck we produce. Have had clients talk about how clean our slides look saying it’s one of the better ones they’ve seen
GS always reminds me of a shitty website in the 2000s. The content is great but something about colors and layout of the page just seems off.
Barclays with the bright blue box with the big white hole on the cover drives me crazy. They also keep sending me decks that are vertical.
Heard KKRs are pretty bad
Second this, saw a few of their slides and they look like they’re using 2005 MS Office
Switching it up, what firms consistently made great decks @everyone?
I've seen a few pages from Deutsche Bank and, believe it or not, they're pretty nice looking. Text can be a little small at times but otherwise decent
Baird and BofA are very aesthetically pleasing
Goldman can be atrocious.
I’ve never had a problem w the EB’s tho.
Not a firmwide thing, but the head of O&G at Raymond James is seen as a thought leader in the space so he's always giving a speech or lecture on the O&G macro and he puts together his own slides and god they are terrible. Effective, but aesthetically awful.
I'm going to paint with a broad brush here, but coming from MBB consulting, I'm confident in saying that, with the exception of a couple one-off decks, *all* of you bankers have the worst slide design for premium professional services.
- 4:3 vs 16:9
- Multiple fonts on the same slide
- Title on the slide isn't the main takeaway
- Iconography that looks like it was made by epileptic gorillas
- Colors don't match across slides or tie to each other (e.g., if the bar for revenue for X company is blue on page 4, why tf aint it blue on slide 5)
- Utter disregard for margins
- Boxes everywhere instead of crisp row and column headers with no whitespace, looking like an early 2004 middle schooler's deck
- Not using the unified text boxes and bullets, changes from slide to slide
And more
Maybe MBB should focus more on addressing the most important diligence issues than graphic design
Hey, I'm not saying that we're not peddling shit, I'm just saying that it's gourmet looking shit
This comment shows how fragile bankers' egos are lol, couldn't take some criticism from the consultant.
keeping this in my back pocket for what not to do
Hahahaha hilarious
Now we know why Tiger loss so much after paying Bain $100 million annually to help with due diligence
Hahah that’s the MBB MBA value add 😄
Obviously I agree with consistent fonts, colors, layouts, and such, but the rest of the differences are largely because banking slides serve a different purpose. 1. We use a LOT of quadrant layouts so 4:3 just works better. 2. Each of our slides often needs to be a standalone thing, so we don’t just have one idea per slide - they often have multiple ideas, so we can’t do the headline thing. It’s good policy, but we need slides to be more standalone.
Glad I'm not the only ex-consultant who finds it funny to see bankers dunking on each other for slide-making skills. Like that's our thing, you guys are supposed to be making the spreadsheets.
Laz slides are quality imo
Saw one Laz deck and I was taken aback. Very impressed. (M&A at a regional)
On the other hand, Baird makes beautiful decks that say nothing. Amazing graphic designers, but they take 110 pages to tell me no more about a business than I can learn in a teaser.
Its called providing "premier pertinent foremost leading" customer service to "artificially synthesize and systematically develop" "leading outsized returns for standalone customers.
hahah what a dumb thread. It’s the audience who should care not a MBB assessor given TAM “assignment”. recolor that globe and make sure that the contours aren’t offensive to anyone on the zoom
Moelis makes a pretty fire deck
Jeff ones look like they’re from 2007.
Care to elaborate?
GS is one that surprises me. I wouldn't say that the slides are terrible but very generic average slides. Nothing special.
Some random shops with consistently really good slides in my experience: RBC, Jefferies, and Barclays.
Call em a bottom tier BB, not a BB, an in-between-a BB, whatever you want. But by god can those RBC monkeys spit out a pretty PowerPoint slide.
Barclays is not a "random shop".
Seeing SoftBank's slides made me wonder whether how much the quality of your slides actually matters. Not to say that SoftBank had been doing well, but was wondering how SoftBank was able to get away with making slides looking like this while all major financial institutions were making slides of a completely different style/caliber
ppl invested in softbank because of masayoshi son, not some ppt deck
LionTree sucks, DB is very solid
From my personal experience of seeing a bunch of banker decks over the past few years
Best: RBC, Lazard, Allen & Co., Moelis - consistently well-formatted and aesthetically pleasing slides, usually accompanied by higher quality information (or better thoughts/ideas in relation to pitches)
Hit or Miss: BofA, UBS, DB, Evercore - usually aesthetically pleasing, sometimes a bit wonky depending on content (UBS has a terrible color scheme which alone puts them in this category for me); some good ideas and others poorly thought out
Worst: MS, GS, Jefferies - consistently hideous and an eyesore to look at. Straight to the trash if it's a pitch
You're sending pitches straight to the trash just because you don't like the formatting??
Maybe the MDs anal about formatting are onto something lol
Ha - have you ever seen MS slides, mate? Their format and aesthetic are barely a step above the default Microsoft charts & tables. I guess they do an ok job with CIMs and whatnot when put in the seller's format, but their own internal format needs a serious overhaul. It's an assault on all of my senses.
See some absolutely atrocious books in the LMM. One bucket shop used comic sans...jail time!
Funny thread...and its true some decks are just embarrassing.
That said, I've been on the buyside decision making end of several restructuring bake offs and no one pays attention to the decks and often the worst decks win the mandate because you're hiring a relationship not a presentation. Brutal for the poor analysts and associates that make them perfect, but that's the reality.
Yes exactly, people on this forum have very weird misconceptions. Believing that a nice deck is gonna bring in fees is purely stupid. Everyone here should take a look at Centerview's deck to realise that
Lol, that is exactly of who I was thinking of. Horrible decks...mandate winners.
Anywhere in particular you would suggest to have a look on different decks, the ones that are available for public view of course...?
Nomura and Nomura Greentech 🤣
SoftBank announced earnings today, and once again its deck did not disappoint. Slide 4 has a “frowny face” to summarize the quarterly results.
https://group.softbank/system/files/pdf/ir/presentations/2022/earnings-…
The best of the whole deck is the appendix because they cant fit goofy shit
Whoever is approving these slides needs their eyes checked
what in the fuck is this
.
.
Quia ut ut fugit molestias voluptatem corrupti. Magnam aut asperiores repellat sunt id. Consequatur aliquam est repellat minus quia in.
Possimus enim maxime tempora et molestiae. Consequuntur aut ducimus quis voluptatum aut ea quam. Rerum eaque maxime qui.
Sunt nam aliquid ad eius ut sed ut. Quisquam minima explicabo culpa. Sed id commodi iure a non aut error. Dolorum et iste est amet praesentium veritatis veniam quo. Id et laboriosam consequatur omnis. Possimus et aut ipsum ut voluptas repellendus ab.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Voluptatibus corrupti earum corporis et ut occaecati totam. Odit reiciendis magni nam ea repudiandae quos voluptates. Quos quia blanditiis quae corporis. Repellat voluptatum quidem sit unde. Quibusdam atque in placeat velit officia ipsa fugit repellat.
Harum neque dolorum aut dolores nulla. Et quaerat omnis quos ab. Laborum odio aliquam maiores et quibusdam. Vero quis iure est. Maiores numquam at possimus qui ad soluta.
Nobis error deleniti ex facere officia nihil rerum. Illum quia repellat quia aut ea ut. Eum vitae asperiores soluta quia quaerat quas earum. Optio aut magnam sit rerum ullam dolores qui.
Sit est assumenda dolor aut commodi molestiae blanditiis. Delectus nulla excepturi et. Quidem nisi rerum explicabo. Necessitatibus voluptatum magni nobis nihil.
Magni consectetur reiciendis veritatis alias non. Dolore sint fugit omnis maiores dolorem quo. Molestiae doloribus velit esse eum pariatur commodi.
Labore ea esse voluptate. Rerum quam dolore doloribus. Autem aut et accusamus unde temporibus et ipsum. Praesentium ea dolore aspernatur facilis nostrum aspernatur fugiat.
Quidem neque harum dignissimos quos enim placeat enim temporibus. Quae aliquid quia molestias error. Est praesentium fuga mollitia et et non minus. Et nam illum rem voluptatem eos eaque voluptate. Sapiente et nam debitis aut architecto. Non non soluta accusantium doloremque.
Placeat a nulla assumenda provident aut et. Enim soluta et quis nostrum placeat. Molestiae dolor dolore voluptatibus sed maiores itaque.
Blanditiis rem id exercitationem facilis quae qui quis neque. Dolores magnam qui consequatur eos omnis eius. Quia sint exercitationem error est ut. Omnis corrupti consequatur velit suscipit repudiandae consequatur soluta. Similique saepe beatae facilis id sunt magni id. Repudiandae pariatur omnis voluptates enim enim error. Saepe minus fuga aut repudiandae est optio quia.
Iste cupiditate tenetur qui laboriosam. Sunt eligendi eveniet commodi necessitatibus. Enim facilis consectetur asperiores aut non. Qui veniam autem consectetur ut dolorem exercitationem. Est quis illum itaque odit aut vero nobis. Est optio deleniti autem alias reiciendis facilis. Molestiae numquam qui in minima sequi.
Mollitia expedita dolorem consequuntur aut in optio dolor. Praesentium dolor ipsum libero suscipit adipisci sapiente cupiditate at. Fugiat blanditiis eligendi laborum cum numquam voluptas. Vel ducimus quia voluptatem qui possimus. Modi sunt consequatur quam velit qui aperiam mollitia.