Worst slides ever?
Have a buddy that laughs everytime he gets a book from Piper Sandler. Very curious to hear what other banks have ridiculous looking decks.
Trending Content
| +135 | If Tik Tok is forced to sell, what banks do you think would be involved in the deal? | 60 | 7h | |
| +53 | Intern Ettiquette | 14 | 1d | |
| +49 | Ranking banks that went under | 34 | 21h | |
| +42 | Relevance of A-Levels for U.K. London recruiting | 31 | 5h | |
| +39 | Burnt Out M&A ASO | 22 | 1d | |
| +38 | Would comitting to ATL İB be stupid? Please give feedback. | 21 | 1h | |
| +34 | NEED NY RESTAURANT RECOMMENDATIONS | 23 | 2h | |
| +27 | 2024 new grads who didnt get return offers update | 12 | 1d | |
| +23 | PSA to gymcels: focus on the summer internship | 9 | 2d | |
| +21 | IB Career Guideline | 12 | 11h |
Career Resources
bump
I got a Triple Tree deck recently that felt like it was made by interns. Had two typos in the first sentence on the first page.
Who the fuck are Triple Tree?
Basically anything SoftBank churns out
https://www.vice.com/en/article/qvg94x/these-delusional-powerpoint-slid…
Wow. Atrocious
Holy shit this is the worst deck I’ve ever seen
That deck looks worse than any of my middle school presentations.
Was it target?
Surely this is satire?
Agreed. Still worked though, which says something about how important pitch decks really are.
It looks like something that would be distributed to LPs if your LPs were batshit deluded oil rich saudis who don't actually know shit about fuck but like the spectacle of being involved in huge global deals.
Softbank playing chess not checkers. Laugh if you will, but they never run out of money to raise or spend.
not gonna lie this reminds me of the type of sh*t I produced for one of the interviews - I cringe thinking of that though very sweet memory :)
This can't be legit surely.....
That looks like something the gang on Always Sunny would put together to pitch one of their scams
I always thought UBS decks were ugly because of their unfortunate color scheme. Brown, dark red, dark orange, yellow, grey color scheme always looked bad no matter what was on the page.
+1 for SoftBank. The “Valley of the Coronavirus” image on slide 51 of the deck below is legendary.
https://group.softbank/system/files/pdf/ir/presentations/2019/earnings-…
what the fuck?
Holy shit is everyone at SoftBank smoking crack?
their executive coach is Ozzy Osbourne
The entire deck is insane.
wow...this feels like a fake deck they'd put together for a bit on impractical jokers
If bankers had a sense of humor that would be a good punishment, just have the guys present a normal pitch deck
LMAO that looks like some shitty game ad on instagram
It's because they're presenting to batshit crazy Saudi royal LPs and not typical pension / endowment / PE FoF groups based out of the US
Their fundraising speaks for itself
I think it's worth mentioning that we very rarely read the slides.
This was exactly my thought. Literally was thinking how much do I really read the slides that are in any powerpoint (or how much does anyone really?)
I always would talk with colleagues about the usual adage of "I can't wait to put XX hours into a deck that will literally be thrown into the garbage"
I giggled out loud once when someone actually threw a deck I made away in front of me. My boss then told me never to giggle again.
That's not what cajole means.
Lincoln international makes terrible slides
Can you elaborate?
They just look terrible? Not visually pleasing at all. Lots of white space. I’ve seen some of my ex finance professors make better PowerPoints than lincoln’s decks
How they only make slides?
Lincoln International's analysts (generally, with exceptions I'm sure) are not allowed to touch the model, that's associate-and-above responsibilities. As such, analysts and SAs are disproportionately working on these decks, which may explain why you dislike the slides. I haven't seen them first-hand, but this reasoning could explain why.
Not sure where this is coming from. Worked at Lincoln and we have had professional slides developed for every deck we produce. Have had clients talk about how clean our slides look saying it’s one of the better ones they’ve seen
GS always reminds me of a shitty website in the 2000s. The content is great but something about colors and layout of the page just seems off.
Barclays with the bright blue box with the big white hole on the cover drives me crazy. They also keep sending me decks that are vertical.
Heard KKRs are pretty bad
Second this, saw a few of their slides and they look like they’re using 2005 MS Office
Switching it up, what firms consistently made great decks @everyone?
I've seen a few pages from Deutsche Bank and, believe it or not, they're pretty nice looking. Text can be a little small at times but otherwise decent
Baird and BofA are very aesthetically pleasing
Goldman can be atrocious.
I’ve never had a problem w the EB’s tho.
Not a firmwide thing, but the head of O&G at Raymond James is seen as a thought leader in the space so he's always giving a speech or lecture on the O&G macro and he puts together his own slides and god they are terrible. Effective, but aesthetically awful.
I'm going to paint with a broad brush here, but coming from MBB consulting, I'm confident in saying that, with the exception of a couple one-off decks, *all* of you bankers have the worst slide design for premium professional services.
- 4:3 vs 16:9
- Multiple fonts on the same slide
- Title on the slide isn't the main takeaway
- Iconography that looks like it was made by epileptic gorillas
- Colors don't match across slides or tie to each other (e.g., if the bar for revenue for X company is blue on page 4, why tf aint it blue on slide 5)
- Utter disregard for margins
- Boxes everywhere instead of crisp row and column headers with no whitespace, looking like an early 2004 middle schooler's deck
- Not using the unified text boxes and bullets, changes from slide to slide
And more
Maybe MBB should focus more on addressing the most important diligence issues than graphic design
Hey, I'm not saying that we're not peddling shit, I'm just saying that it's gourmet looking shit
This comment shows how fragile bankers' egos are lol, couldn't take some criticism from the consultant.
keeping this in my back pocket for what not to do
Hahahaha hilarious
Now we know why Tiger loss so much after paying Bain $100 million annually to help with due diligence
Hahah that’s the MBB MBA value add 😄
Obviously I agree with consistent fonts, colors, layouts, and such, but the rest of the differences are largely because banking slides serve a different purpose. 1. We use a LOT of quadrant layouts so 4:3 just works better. 2. Each of our slides often needs to be a standalone thing, so we don’t just have one idea per slide - they often have multiple ideas, so we can’t do the headline thing. It’s good policy, but we need slides to be more standalone.
Glad I'm not the only ex-consultant who finds it funny to see bankers dunking on each other for slide-making skills. Like that's our thing, you guys are supposed to be making the spreadsheets.
Laz slides are quality imo
Saw one Laz deck and I was taken aback. Very impressed. (M&A at a regional)
On the other hand, Baird makes beautiful decks that say nothing. Amazing graphic designers, but they take 110 pages to tell me no more about a business than I can learn in a teaser.
Its called providing "premier pertinent foremost leading" customer service to "artificially synthesize and systematically develop" "leading outsized returns for standalone customers.
hahah what a dumb thread. It’s the audience who should care not a MBB assessor given TAM “assignment”. recolor that globe and make sure that the contours aren’t offensive to anyone on the zoom
Moelis makes a pretty fire deck
Jeff ones look like they’re from 2007.
Care to elaborate?
GS is one that surprises me. I wouldn't say that the slides are terrible but very generic average slides. Nothing special.
Some random shops with consistently really good slides in my experience: RBC, Jefferies, and Barclays.
Call em a bottom tier BB, not a BB, an in-between-a BB, whatever you want. But by god can those RBC monkeys spit out a pretty PowerPoint slide.
Barclays is not a "random shop".
Seeing SoftBank's slides made me wonder whether how much the quality of your slides actually matters. Not to say that SoftBank had been doing well, but was wondering how SoftBank was able to get away with making slides looking like this while all major financial institutions were making slides of a completely different style/caliber
ppl invested in softbank because of masayoshi son, not some ppt deck
LionTree sucks, DB is very solid
From my personal experience of seeing a bunch of banker decks over the past few years
Best: RBC, Lazard, Allen & Co., Moelis - consistently well-formatted and aesthetically pleasing slides, usually accompanied by higher quality information (or better thoughts/ideas in relation to pitches)
Hit or Miss: BofA, UBS, DB, Evercore - usually aesthetically pleasing, sometimes a bit wonky depending on content (UBS has a terrible color scheme which alone puts them in this category for me); some good ideas and others poorly thought out
Worst: MS, GS, Jefferies - consistently hideous and an eyesore to look at. Straight to the trash if it's a pitch
You're sending pitches straight to the trash just because you don't like the formatting??
Maybe the MDs anal about formatting are onto something lol
Ha - have you ever seen MS slides, mate? Their format and aesthetic are barely a step above the default Microsoft charts & tables. I guess they do an ok job with CIMs and whatnot when put in the seller's format, but their own internal format needs a serious overhaul. It's an assault on all of my senses.
See some absolutely atrocious books in the LMM. One bucket shop used comic sans...jail time!
Funny thread...and its true some decks are just embarrassing.
That said, I've been on the buyside decision making end of several restructuring bake offs and no one pays attention to the decks and often the worst decks win the mandate because you're hiring a relationship not a presentation. Brutal for the poor analysts and associates that make them perfect, but that's the reality.
Yes exactly, people on this forum have very weird misconceptions. Believing that a nice deck is gonna bring in fees is purely stupid. Everyone here should take a look at Centerview's deck to realise that
Lol, that is exactly of who I was thinking of. Horrible decks...mandate winners.
Anywhere in particular you would suggest to have a look on different decks, the ones that are available for public view of course...?
Nomura and Nomura Greentech 🤣
SoftBank announced earnings today, and once again its deck did not disappoint. Slide 4 has a “frowny face” to summarize the quarterly results.
https://group.softbank/system/files/pdf/ir/presentations/2022/earnings-…
The best of the whole deck is the appendix because they cant fit goofy shit
Whoever is approving these slides needs their eyes checked
what in the fuck is this
.
.
Aliquid mollitia nihil aut distinctio quas aperiam consequuntur et. Libero qui repellendus est dolores et consequatur. Quidem nihil tempora cum. Similique eveniet quos molestias.
In ratione quia eum et ipsum. Animi quia voluptatum aut consequatur non fugiat. Earum voluptas facere atque ducimus eaque minima neque aspernatur. Sit quia laborum voluptatem autem sit adipisci. Quia praesentium assumenda omnis accusamus vel blanditiis.
Beatae reprehenderit voluptates a magnam tenetur numquam. Quo magnam repellat sit ut. Velit sit quis beatae quia corporis necessitatibus. Nesciunt dolore voluptate et in autem sed.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Cumque totam ullam modi repudiandae tempore ipsum ullam et. Officia soluta maxime adipisci et. Suscipit unde adipisci dolorem eaque sint autem. Ad aperiam molestiae qui nostrum. Vero molestiae sed non quis velit. Incidunt ut quidem et quis ut corporis saepe.
Voluptas consequatur officia veniam excepturi quis deserunt. Totam numquam ullam blanditiis iure ea. Enim est voluptas illum exercitationem magnam dolore labore. Molestiae facere laudantium laboriosam molestias et labore.
Quibusdam quibusdam velit dolores vero et voluptas quia autem. Doloribus sint ab non quis ullam in provident. Doloremque fugit ut incidunt alias. Repudiandae reprehenderit placeat non.
Ut asperiores labore et ipsum ea eligendi. Deserunt repellat assumenda adipisci ea laudantium adipisci omnis. Cumque aut corrupti mollitia ut in sunt soluta. Quis mollitia velit recusandae cum laboriosam ea ut. Excepturi et hic aliquam amet impedit quibusdam non. Libero omnis amet voluptatem qui porro iusto. Repellat qui voluptatem ex cupiditate dolorum.
Molestias animi quia facere reiciendis occaecati sit ut. Dolorum quis et qui molestiae. Excepturi reprehenderit saepe alias debitis reprehenderit aut culpa. Qui fugit adipisci praesentium accusantium quia odit quisquam ex.
Autem totam fuga dolores est et quo dolores. Eveniet aspernatur natus doloremque qui dolores. Recusandae ratione non repellendus quas voluptatum nisi. Et nisi aperiam quis voluptatibus. Nihil quos reiciendis maxime qui voluptas ipsam.
Deleniti nesciunt vero animi. Suscipit adipisci omnis doloremque aut. Enim consequatur magnam eum vel ipsam quaerat. Ratione cumque et et consequuntur tempora. Delectus consectetur fugiat sed qui eos possimus. Facere rerum illo omnis et tempore tempora doloremque. Nihil voluptas iusto officia minima.